Semester grades

[The Sultan]

I'm overly critical of Norman too according to you.  You don't have a problem with Ben.  I think you scolded someone yesterday for being too harsh on Hamilton.  "It's Caedin". I believe you said. 

So whose performance are you actually bothered by then?

I was certainly not criticizing people harshing on Caedin. At best he should be playing 5-8 minutes as a back up. You just gotta spell his name right.

Tre is also fine in his extremely limited role. Seems like a good teammate, so having someone like that on your roster is OK. In fact, in terms of win shares per 40, Tre and Ben are tied with Nigel for second place. Which means when they play, they are largely effective relative to their playing time.

I have more problems with guys who are being given large roles and underperforming.

Zaide is third in minutes played, and eigth in WS per 40. (Excluding a walk-on)
Royce is fifth and 9th respectively.
Caedin is sixth and 10th.

This is where the problems are. Big minute guys who just aren't performing. Ben and Tre? You can carve out roles for them where they can be fine. But you can't surround them with these guys.

And then there's Owens and Jones - even uglier.

[The Sultan]

Anyway, what I would do is continue to start Stevens and James. Both are developing really well.  I would also carve out a larger role for Clark. If your defense is going to be bad, at least you have a rim defender back there.

But outside of that, this team just doesn't have the talent to compete.  And nothing is going to change that this year.

[panda]

No, a senior who stinks is not "the least of our problems"!  RGV is not supposed to be seniors who are lousy.  I'm not blaming Gold alone either. Many, many issues have contributed to this mess so far. Gold is at least in the top 5. He's improved a little overall, but not nearly enough for what this team needs from him.

The Caedin Hamilton Josh Clark experiment is far worse. The rotations are horrible. Gold can be on the court and not completely embarrass himself. That can't be said about many others on this team.

[TSmith34, Inc.]

I don't really have a problem with Ben. He's just not good enough to be the second option on a contending team. If there was more talent around him, like last year, he can be effective in a more limited role.

^This. Ben is serviceable, but if you are counting on him to be your lead dog you're in trouble.

Likewise, Chase would be a great 6th man off the bench. Exceptional athleticism and heart, but also not cut out to be the alpha on a good team.

Zaide...he has the athleticism and basketball ability to be a great 3rd option, but he needs a WHOLE lot more intensity. 50% of Oso/Stevie/Tyler would be a good start.

Royce would be a good 8th-10th guy in the rotation on a good team; unfortunately, we need him to start on this one.

Sean is not a BE starter, or anything more than a 5-8 minute spark off the bench. He is, however, light years ahead of Tre. DO...what happened to that guy???? Hamilton is a low major player thrust into a role he has no business being in.

Freshmen have been great for Freshmen. Hopefully the incoming class has another couple of BE-quality starters, but Shaka needs to find some help on the interior through the portal next year.

[Newsdreams]

As one of our two seniors, he scored 3 on 1-7 shooting and 0-3 from 3.  We lost by a point.  Many open looks.  So yeah, FOH.

Why don't you answer Markusquette what only you're seeing in Gold and how he's been "great in a lot of ways"

LOL none of that is how it works. You need to dig deeper.... and use real stats

[Newsdreams]

What are the many ways he's been great? Genuinely curious. Maybe I've missed something. He improved his rebounding numbers.

Overall his trajectory has been disappointing. He's a serviceable bench big man at best for a potential contender. The bigger issue is the sorry state of the other guys up front.

He is in a completely different role this year and he is doing the work he is asked to do at a decent rate

[Newsdreams]

What a load of crap for a player shooting the worst he's shot since freshman year.  But increased usage explains that, right? Or just maybe, he simply isn't good enough for increased usage. 

His EFG is always going to look better because he makes quite a bit more 3's than two point FG. 

Even advanced stats can't tell nearly the whole story. If they did, why would we need to bother to watch the games to provide commentary. 

Enjoy being probably last person here defending his performance.  #Skol

This is funny

[Markusquette]

He is in a completely different role this year and he is doing the work he is asked to do at a decent rate

Decent is not great. Aside from Hamilton at the 5, Ben's role is not "completely" different. Not even trying to hate on Gold. If Ben's best is decent, the issue is not that, it's that most of his counterparts are simply not good.