collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

How Shaka Can Save This Season by Stretchdeltsig
[Today at 02:07:50 PM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by BM1090
[Today at 02:00:34 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by MuggsyB
[Today at 01:53:03 PM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by MuggsyB
[Today at 12:26:10 PM]


2026 Transfer Portal Wishlist by MarquetteMike1977
[Today at 03:25:38 AM]


Lifetime Contract Extension by MuggsyB
[December 24, 2025, 10:09:03 PM]


Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by marqfan22
[December 24, 2025, 08:24:00 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

Do you have a threshold for showing Shaka the door in March?

No. None. You're overreacting and insane. He took us to a S16 FFS! A S16!!!
106 (44.9%)
Last place in the BE with a statement he's not going to the portal.
80 (33.9%)
Sub-500 in conference with a statement he's not going to the portal
34 (14.4%)
Missing the NCATT - we can still make it right?
0 (0%)
Why wait until the end of the season?
5 (2.1%)
Arbys
11 (4.7%)

Total Members Voted: 236

Vander Blue Man Group

Quote from: brewcity77 on Today at 01:00:49 AMYou keep saying this and it's simply idiotic. WE WERE RANKED IN THE TOP 10 TO START MARCH IN YEAR 5!!!

Stop acting like it was unreasonable to support the coach of a top-10 team.

We were ranked in the top 5 last season.

Vander Blue Man Group

Quote from: MarquetteMike1977 on Today at 03:20:37 AMThe current players might like Shaka but have heard some former players are upset with Shaka.

Care to share more?

MU82

Quote from: MarquetteMike1977 on Today at 03:20:37 AMThe current players might like Shaka but have heard some former players are upset with Shaka.

Without names and reasons, as well as something to vouch for the credibility of the source, this sounds questionable at best.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Small Orange Soda

Quote from: MU82 on Today at 10:50:01 AMWithout names and reasons, as well as something to vouch for the credibility of the source, this sounds questionable at best.

Former players are fans too.

Zog from Margo

Quote from: brewcity77 on December 24, 2025, 01:20:12 AMI'm not off the rails. The simple reality is Shaka has built his program around RGV and it is clearly a failed model, and he can't retool the roster the way it needs to be retooled without betraying everything he's said the last 4 years. I take him at his word, which means either he compromises his morals and promises to players, he doesn't compromise and we continue to suck, or he leaves.

I don't think he'll do the first option, I don't think the second is acceptable, which leaves only the third. It's not that he's not capable, it's that he's painted himself into a corner and can't stay at Marquette and quickly turn this around without betraying all the trust he's built up.

And no, we didn't pursue Owen Freeman or any other transfers. We haven't seriously pursued a D1 transfer in years.

I think "betraying trust" is an overstatement. Ben Steele said in his article that he expects a couple of players to transfer after the season and Shaka has not said he would never use the portal. Shaka has given the guys he recruited every chance in the world to succeed. He's already favored them over players in the portal. So giving them years to show what they have before telling them they won't be playing in the future at MU is not betraying any trust IMO.

Viper

Quote from: Vander Blue Man Group on Today at 09:01:06 AMWe were ranked in the top 5 last season.
preseason #18. Made it to # 5 early December . Still top 10 early January. Overrated, but no one is complaining! Started to slide from there...#25 heading into the BET. Unranked the week after. 1st rd ncaa exit. You know the rest. 
Support CBP 🇺🇸

MuggsyB

Quote from: Zog from Margo on Today at 11:03:57 AMI think "betraying trust" is an overstatement. Ben Steele said in his article that he expects a couple of players to transfer after the season and Shaka has not said he would never use the portal. Shaka has given the guys he recruited every chance in the world to succeed. He's already favored them over players in the portal. So giving them years to show what they have before telling them they won't be playing in the future at MU is not betraying any trust IMO.

100% correct.  Especially in this climate.  It's time to get some freaking ballers with an array or skills and weapons at their disposal. 

jesmu84

Quote from: MarquetteMike1977 on Today at 03:20:37 AMThe current players might like Shaka but have heard some former players are upset with Shaka.

Source?

wadesworld

Quote from: jesmu84 on Today at 12:59:11 PMSource?

Somebody whispered it in his ear. Just like somebody whispered that Nolan's dream school was MU but we don't have the money for him and that Nolan's family says that MU needs more than just Nolan.

BM1090

Quote from: Elonsmusk on December 24, 2025, 08:45:07 AMWell the good news is for a measured guy like you (who apparently isn't off the rails) and who formerly preached patience, and gave Wojo 5 years - Shaka will have 5 years to show that he's getting things on the right "trajectory."  He, far more than a guy like Wojo, should get 5 years, since he's already accomplished a crap ton at MU in his first 4 years.

So, lets call this Year 1 of Wojo, essentially.  To argue Shaka has to fix it in one year is silly - much like you, TAMU and other Projos suggested needing to give Wojo time to improve versus firing him after 1 or 2 years - and he didn't even have any skins on the wall for credentials of a Final Four, Sweet 16, 4 straight NCAAs at MU out of the gate before tailing off.



Look. Shaka has accomplished infinitely more than Wojo. He's a better coach. He's a better developer of talent. I prefer him as a representative of the university. I relate to him a lot more.

But we're staring at a year that would be significantly worse than Wojo's first two years. We might be the worst power conference team in the nation this year. If he has another one next year, he should be fired. If they improve a lot next year and but are still bad, I'd give him another year to show he's back on track. But this is an insanely bad team. And he's responsible for it.

I like Shaka a lot and hope he's here a long time, but he needs to do better than whatever the hell this is.

Previous topic - Next topic