collapse

Resources

Stud of Oklahoma Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

What does this team do well? by Zog from Margo
[Today at 04:21:34 PM]


James vs Jones by hawk
[Today at 04:11:24 PM]


Actions Shakas taken after a bad team by Viper
[Today at 04:05:14 PM]


Single game tix prices by panda
[Today at 03:48:25 PM]


[Paint Touches] On talent deficiency and offensive offense by GoldenEagles03
[Today at 03:39:42 PM]


Hard to maintain interest by K1 Lover
[Today at 01:05:41 PM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by MU82
[Today at 08:55:07 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Valparaiso

Marquette
74
Marquette vs.
Valparaiso
Date/Time: Dec 2, 2025, 7:00pm
TV: ESPN+
Schedule for 2025-26
Oklahoma
75

Galway Eagle

While at Marquette Shakas given a few interviews where he's mentioned he's had "one bad team" and that the lack of connectivity and buy in to the culture is what he felt cratered that season and why he's so invested in what has now become the RGV model.

I'm curious if anyone has taken a look at that team's issues and what pivots Shaka made after that 2017 season? Perhaps that could help inform us as to what to expect after this year.
Retire Terry Rand's jersey!

jfp61

Shaka isn't wrong. The culture of this group is poor.

Now its poor because he allowed sophmores and juniors to fail upwards.

We have Gold and Ross and very little else

Pakuni

Quote from: Galway Eagle on Today at 10:14:57 AMWhile at Marquette Shakas given a few interviews where he's mentioned he's had "one bad team" and that the lack of connectivity and buy in to the culture is what he felt cratered that season and why he's so invested in what has now become the RGV model.

I'm curious if anyone has taken a look at that team's issues and what pivots Shaka made after that 2017 season? Perhaps that could help inform us as to what to expect after this year.

He brought in a top 10 recruiting class highlighted by Mo Bamba, Matt Coleman and Jericho Sims. Two of them were immediate starters and the other was starting by the end of the season.
They grew and built relationships quickly.

TheREALwrk

Quote from: jfp61 on Today at 10:22:50 AMShaka isn't wrong. The culture of this group is poor.

Now its poor because he allowed sophmores and juniors to fail upwards.

We have Gold and Ross and very little else

You count having Ben Gold as having something?

jfp61

Quote from: TheREALwrk on Today at 10:27:08 AMYou count having Ben Gold as having something?
Somehow..... He is clearly the second best player on this team.

Shooter McGavin

He is the best big on the team on a team with no serviceable bigs. Because of that his importance is inflated. Nijel James is the second best player overall.

Viper

Quote from: jfp61 on Today at 10:30:56 AMSomehow..... He is clearly the second best player on this team.
if I have Ross & James as 1 & 2, you'd place Gold ahead of...?
Support CBP 🇺🇸

Galway Eagle

Quote from: Pakuni on Today at 10:25:11 AMHe brought in a top 10 recruiting class highlighted by Mo Bamba, Matt Coleman and Jericho Sims. Two of them were immediate starters and the other was starting by the end of the season.
They grew and built relationships quickly.

Didn't realize that class came after that year. Beyond recruiting he didn't make any adjustments? Staff, style, cut a bunch of returners?
Retire Terry Rand's jersey!

jfp61

Quote from: Viper on Today at 10:37:00 AMif I have Ross & James as 1 & 2, you'd place Gold ahead of...?
James.... because defense is fun

Johnny B

Quote from: jfp61 on Today at 10:48:51 AMJames.... because defense is fun
Forgot gold was some elite defender

Shooter McGavin

He's the only big who can defend.  So this will be a circular argument.

jfp61

Quote from: Johnny B on Today at 10:53:30 AMForgot gold was some elite defender
COMPARED TO EVERYONE ELSE ON THIS TEAM HE SOMEHOW IS

Juan Anderson's Mixtape

Ben Gold gets more hate than deserved. Through 8 games, Evan Miya has him ranked 31st in the Big East based on Bayesian Performance Rating. (For comparison, Chase is ranked 7th and our third highest rated player is Royce at 48th.)

If senior year Ben Gold swapped places with junior year David Joplin, Gold would be just fine as a 4th/5th starter.  If Gold could swap places with senior year Dwight Burke, he would have been a huge upgrade and thrived next to the Amigos and Hayward.

Unfortunately, this team needs a number 2 scoring option and Ben never developed into more than a complementary piece.  Yes, it's somewhat disappointing, but that disappointment is exacerbated by the overall futility of the rest of the roster.

Pakuni

Quote from: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on Today at 11:19:46 AMBen Gold gets more hate than deserved. Through 8 games, Evan Miya has him ranked 31st in the Big East based on Bayesian Performance Rating. (For comparison, Chase is ranked 7th and our third highest rated player is Royce at 48th.)

This makes him a below average starter in the Big East. Which is exactly what he is.
Is that worthy of "hate?" No. He is who he is. But it's understandable for MU fans to be frustrated that their #2 guy is a below average starter in the entire conference.
And RGV can't work if your fourth-year players are below average starters.




BM1090

Quote from: Pakuni on Today at 11:40:55 AMThis makes him a below average starter in the Big East. Which is exactly what he is.
Is that worthy of "hate?" No. He is who he is. But it's understandable for MU fans to be frustrated that their #2 guy is a below average starter in the entire conference.
And RGV can't work if your fourth-year players are below average starters.





Right. There's nothing wrong with Ben. He's a deserving starter. It's the fact that he's our 2nd (or 3rd) best player that makes it a huge issue.

MU82

Quote from: Shooter McGavin on Today at 10:35:02 AMHe is the best big on the team on a team with no serviceable bigs. Because of that his importance is inflated. Nijel James is the second best player overall.

If Nijel is second best, is Nigel third best? Or vice versa?

(Sorry, couldn't resist.)
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Juan Anderson's Mixtape

Quote from: BM1090 on Today at 12:32:49 PMRight. There's nothing wrong with Ben. He's a deserving starter. It's the fact that he's our 2nd (or 3rd) best player that makes it a huge issue.

Completely agree.


Quote from: Pakuni on Today at 11:40:55 AMThis makes him a below average starter in the Big East. Which is exactly what he is.
Is that worthy of "hate?" No. He is who he is. But it's understandable for MU fans to be frustrated that their #2 guy is a below average starter in the entire conference.
And RGV can't work if your fourth-year players are below average starters.

We are pretty much in agreement.  The only thing I slightly disagree with is your last sentence.

You can overcome a 4th year player being a below average starter if the rest of the roster is good enough.  Unfortunately, the sophomores and juniors have a grand total of 1 low level BE starter (Royce), 1-2 rotation players (Zaide, and maybe Sean), and a whole lotta mess.

Fans are justifiably upset, that we agree on.

BCHoopster

The biggest disappointment is the Sophmore class. When I initially saw Owens at last years Scrimmage, I thought he might be the next star on this team even last year, not getting off the bench is surprising.  Parham is so soft that adding him to the other bigs makes the front line weak at best.  Will not
Even discuss Caedin, not his fault, Shaka took a chance on him.

Markusquette

Quote from: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on Today at 01:20:40 PMCompletely agree.


We are pretty much in agreement.  The only thing I slightly disagree with is your last sentence.

You can overcome a 4th year player being a below average starter if the rest of the roster is good enough.  Unfortunately, the sophomores and juniors have a grand total of 1 low level BE starter (Royce), 1-2 rotation players (Zaide, and maybe Sean), and a whole lotta mess.

Fans are justifiably upset, that we agree on.

You can overcome by acquiring talent to make up for the misses in recruiting. I have a hard time believing Shaka didn't see the writing on the wall with some of these guys. I think he is stuck in his way and hopes that he will be able to cultivate teams full of talent + sustained growth and development using this model, but the reality is that may be taxing.

#UnleashNigel

Quote from: jfp61 on Today at 10:22:50 AMShaka isn't wrong. The culture of this group is poor.

Now its poor because he allowed sophmores and juniors to fail upwards.

We have Gold and Ross and very little else

You have gold as one of the non failures? We watching the same games this year?

#UnleashNigel

Quote from: jfp61 on Today at 10:30:56 AMSomehow..... He is clearly the second best player on this team.

That's pretty clearly Nigel

Jay Bee

The portal is NOT closed.

Pakuni

#22
I say this with obviously no inside information on how the staff has tried to coach Ben behind closed doors, but I wonder if he'd been better off from the start if they tried to develop him as more of an inside/out  player in the Zach Freemantle mold rather than try to turn him into poor man's Steve Novak.
It's wild to me that four years into his college career, a 6'11" player has no discernible post skills whatsoever. Maybe the staff has tried and it's just not taking, but it seems Ben would be a far more useful and effective player if he weren't relegated to a spot-up shooter who pump fakes and drives 2-3 times a game.

Viper

Quote from: jfp61 on Today at 10:22:50 AMShaka isn't wrong. The culture of this group is poor.

Now its poor because he allowed sophmores and juniors to fail upwards.

We have Gold and Ross and very little else
...but isn't Shaka wrong because of his overall assessment of talent? Ross, James...that's it. BUT, basketball doesn't need stars up and down a roster. If the guy will be yr 1 Shaka, add some transfers, this thing can turn back quickly. Will require he move on a few guys? So be it.
Support CBP 🇺🇸

Previous topic - Next topic