collapse

Resources

Stud of Oklahoma Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

MU 2026-27 - Not too early by MU82
[Today at 04:03:24 PM]


Lineups - just bizarre. Would like to see the contract. by Pakuni
[Today at 04:01:54 PM]


James vs Jones by mileskishnish72
[Today at 03:59:12 PM]


OU v MU 11/28 by Vander Blue Man Group
[Today at 03:16:18 PM]


Shaka’s game management by Newsdreams
[Today at 03:10:59 PM]


What does this team do well? by panda
[Today at 03:09:22 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by Johnny B
[Today at 03:05:21 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Valparaiso

Marquette
74
Marquette vs.
Valparaiso
Date/Time: Dec 2, 2025, 7:00pm
TV: ESPN+
Schedule for 2025-26
Oklahoma
75

wadesworld

Quote from: Small Orange Soda on Today at 02:43:06 PMThe problem is when everyone defending him, like yourself, point out back to back 2 seeds they're talking about a program built differently than the one he's built now.

His first round draft pick was a transfer. His All American PG was a transfer. I'm not someone who thinks he needs to go portaling every year, but you don't get to brag about how he's doing it the right way when this is his first year actually doing that (you can call last year that too, but they fell apart last year). The results are terrible thus far.

Shaka's done it a lot of ways in his coaching career. It's why I think he'll adjust and continue to be a high level coach.

BM1090

Quote from: panda on Today at 02:40:56 PMThis team is alarmingly bad. Without Ross, we would have multiple losses to cupcakes. Much different than shaka's first team/second team.

I don't agree, but even if I did it has nothing to do what I said. I'm not saying we're going to compete for the Big East next year. We're not. But I don't think it's hard to see how this team improves a lot next year either.

Small Orange Soda

Quote from: wadesworld on Today at 02:48:19 PMShaka's done it a lot of ways in his coaching career. It's why I think he'll adjust and continue to be a high level coach.

I certainly hope so. Going into this season with Caedin Hamilton as the starting center has got me having doubts.

panda

#103
Quote from: BM1090 on Today at 02:49:26 PMI don't agree, but even if I did it has nothing to do what I said. I'm not saying we're going to compete for the Big East next year. We're not. But I don't think it's hard to see how this team improves a lot next year either.

Really going out on a limb saying it can't get any worse than this year!

There is no reason a Marquette team in the 5th year of a coaches successful tenure should be this horrible. So many mistakes had to happen to reach this point and much of it is highly concerning for the future if no philosophical changes are made.

BM1090

Quote from: Small Orange Soda on Today at 02:43:06 PMThe problem is when everyone defending him, like yourself, point out back to back 2 seeds they're talking about a program built differently than the one he's built now.

His first round draft pick was a transfer. His All American PG was a transfer. I'm not someone who thinks he needs to go portaling every year, but you don't get to brag about how he's doing it the right way when this is his first year actually doing that (you can call last year that too, but they fell apart last year). The results are terrible thus far.

This is one of my biggest pet peeves in this debate. Who cares they they were transfers? Those transfers played like normal college freshmen and sophomores their first year. Nobody projected them to improve like they did. Some wanted them to transfer out.

It doesn't matter if he takes transfers. It matters that his talent identification improves. This year's freshman class looks a lot better than the last two. That needs to continue. If it does, we'll be fine. If it doesn't, then I'll have concerns about Shaka. But it has nothing to do with if he's willing to take a transfer or two.

BM1090

Quote from: panda on Today at 02:51:55 PMReally going out on a limb saying it can't get any worse than this year!

Very clear you're not interested in an actual discussion. Peace.

panda

Quote from: BM1090 on Today at 02:53:22 PMVery clear you're not interested in an actual discussion. Peace.

See my edit

Small Orange Soda

Quote from: BM1090 on Today at 02:52:16 PMThis is one of my biggest pet peeves in this debate. Who cares they they were transfers? Those transfers played like normal college freshmen and sophomores their first year. Nobody projected them to improve like they did. Some wanted them to transfer out.

It doesn't matter if he takes transfers. It matters that his talent identification improves. This year's freshman class looks a lot better than the last two. That needs to continue. If it does, we'll be fine. If it doesn't, then I'll have concerns about Shaka. But it has nothing to do with if he's willing to take a transfer or two.

I agree with what you're saying about transfers. It's about talent identification.

But so much of the identity has been about no transfers, and well, the biggest success has been with transfers.

But we gotta stop looking into guys who we're in recruiting battles with prep schools for. That's bad.

Johnny B

Quote from: BM1090 on Today at 02:49:26 PMI don't agree, but even if I did it has nothing to do what I said. I'm not saying we're going to compete for the Big East next year. We're not. But I don't think it's hard to see how this team improves a lot next year either.
It's very hard to see

KingKolek

Quote from: BM1090 on Today at 12:32:17 PMYour first point is your own strawman, though. None of us would be opposed to that. Most of us would welcome it.

And re: your second point, I think we'd all agree that the recruiting needs to get better.

I've heard Shaka himself get dismissive and act like we want him to go completely the other way, as well as from at least some avid supporters. I agree though, most thoughtful fans see the middle ground.

Jay Bee

Quote from: Small Orange Soda on Today at 02:50:22 PMI certainly hope so. Going into this season with Caedin Hamilton as the starting center has got me having doubts.

Going into yesterday's game with him still as the starting center has got me having even stronger doubts.
The portal is NOT closed.

panda

Quote from: Jay Bee on Today at 03:04:40 PMGoing into yesterday's game with him still as the starting center has got me having even stronger doubts.

He's averaging almost 20 mins/game! I wonder what blackmail he has on Shaka

Previous topic - Next topic