collapse

Resources

Stud of Indiana Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross2

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Hoosier beat down by Vander Blue Man Group
[Today at 08:50:01 PM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by CountryRoads
[Today at 08:48:12 PM]


It's one game, but..... by Vander Blue Man Group
[Today at 08:46:51 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by Scoop Snoop
[Today at 08:34:06 PM]


Indiana game thread by StillWarriors
[Today at 05:08:27 PM]


Marquette Team Rankings by MarquetteMike1977
[Today at 12:36:43 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Little Rock

Marquette
77
Marquette vs.
Little Rock
Date/Time: Nov 12, 2025, 7:00pm
TV: ESPN+
Schedule for 2025-26
Indiana
100

tower912

Meh.  Actually kind of quiet for the day after the first loss.   A scoop tradition.
In honor of Pope Leo XIV,
Matthew 25: 31-46

onepost

Quote from: Vander Blue Man Group on Today at 06:17:11 PMOh boy...

The story around Kolek has literally no relevance to taking flyers on guys like Hamilton and Clark when you have a 15-man roster with redshirts to work with.

Also, the story around Kolek has absolutely nothing to do with Shaka's current views regarding transfers.  He  literally brought in multiple transfers that first season in order to be able to field a team.  Yet, despite not initally believing Tyler was a fit, Shaka listened to his staff, brought Tyler in and helped develop him into an All-American and NBA player. Then he did the same with Kam. 

The fact that you're somehow twisting this into a "gigantic, enormous" red flag is hilarious. Almost as hilarious as the "one recruit in 4 years" and judging Owens and Parham 3 games into their sophomore seasons nonsense. 

This has been a competitive roster annually in each of Shaka's 4-years yet you're peeing your pants because of a blowout in the 3rd game of the season.  We also have no idea if IU will actually be a "meh" team.   

Also, if don't see the level of talent improving with our younger guys, the incoming class,  and the other recruits Shaka is in on, you're simply not paying attention or being  willfully ignorant.



All of this has been with the caveat of it being early, maybe irrational, but backed by a running trend of multiple seasons. Again with Itejere, Clark, and Hamilton, of course you take fliers on guys: but we're RELYING on Hamilton and he's just not good. He's made evident improvements and he's still not very good is my point. Hopefully Sheek bucks that trend since he actually comes in with some pedigree.

I obviously see the improvement in caliber of HS recruit, but in my opinion a Nigel-Adrien immediately contributing frosh class should be the baseline rule and not the exception.

All to say. Shaka has had great success with transfers and Wojo's recruits (out of necessity), but much less success with his own. So it's annoying he's actively avoiding a path that has proven results. We need to be shown that he can have that and greater success with only his recruits if that's the route we are choosing to go.

MuggsyB

Quote from: Scoop Snoop on Today at 07:23:40 PMBump for Muggsy. You counseling scoopers to be "calm and sensible" is hilarious.  And although I posted today, I did not need a day to sagely consider the matter or pontificate.

Perhaps it would serve you best to take a time-out and chillax.  There are a number of apps and videos that you can peruse to assuage your anxieties and find a relaxed state.  :)

panda

We can litigate the transfer issue until we're blue in the face, but the biggest litmus test for Shaka moving forward is how he tightens up his rotation after the next few games.

I'll be very concerned if we continue to see a healthy dose of the underachievers if they continue to disappoint.

tower912

Underachiever on Sunday is SOTG on Wednesday.
In honor of Pope Leo XIV,
Matthew 25: 31-46

Scoop Snoop

#130
Quote from: MuggsyB on Today at 07:49:48 PMPerhaps it would serve you best to take a time-out and chillax.  There are a number of apps and videos that you can peruse to assuage your anxieties and find a relaxed state.  :)

Classic example of projection Muggsy. Kudos! You're really good at that.
Wild horses couldn't drag me into either political party, but for very different reasons.

"All of our answers are unencumbered by the thought process." NPR's Click and Clack of Car Talk.

brewcity77

Ultimately, I think this really all comes down to getting blasted. If this was a competitive loss, there would still be complaining, but it wouldn't be at this level. Look at the breakdown by 10-minute periods of the game:


                   Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4     T
Indiana         24    32    22    22    100
Marquette    24    14    21    18    77

Ultimately, this game was a blowout because of Q2, which was the part of the game where Nigel James played just 17 seconds. We needed like 26 minutes of NJ and got 18. Hopefully this will help the staff figure out the rotations.

tower912

3 days prior, Sean was the man.
In honor of Pope Leo XIV,
Matthew 25: 31-46

Vander Blue Man Group

Quote from: onepost on Today at 07:32:36 PMAll of this has been with the caveat of it being early, maybe irrational, but backed by a running trend of multiple seasons. Again with Itejere, Clark, and Hamilton, of course you take fliers on guys: but we're RELYING on Hamilton and he's just not good. He's made evident improvements and he's still not very good is my point. Hopefully Sheek bucks that trend since he actually comes in with some pedigree.

I obviously see the improvement in caliber of HS recruit, but in my opinion a Nigel-Adrien immediately contributing frosh class should be the baseline rule and not the exception.

All to say. Shaka has had great success with transfers and Wojo's recruits (out of necessity), but much less success with his own. So it's annoying he's actively avoiding a path that has proven results. We need to be shown that he can have that and greater success with only his recruits if that's the route we are choosing to go.

What trend? Does going from a 2 to a 7 seed constitute a trend? You mention multiple seasons but I don't see any trend over multiple seasons yet. What am I missing?

Also, using the portal is not a panacea. It's not without risk. How did it work out for IU and Kansas last season? There are just as many failures as successes.

You just can't assume it will bring proven results like you say. 

Previous topic - Next topic