Can’t remember a ref reversing a foul to the other team on a replay

[Marqevans]

I thought that was a turning point in our momentum, when the ref reversed a call on Stevie after he was elbowed to the ground!

[brewcity77]

Multiple times this year I've heard them say they can't reverse the call when doing a review. Either the refs have been wrong all year long, or that call was blown.

[Judge Smails]

Cue Sultan to tell us it was the correct call

[Tyler COLEk]

An asinine exception to the rule if the replay was indeed by the books.

[CountryRoads]

I thought that was a turning point in our momentum, when the ref reversed a call on Stevie after he was elbowed to the ground!

Well, I think we did get a stop right after that but have never seen that before. If they are able to reverse a foul call on a review of a flagrant, why draw the line there with what they can change on a review?

[GB Warrior]

Should have been a T on Burns for how he reacted. Completely turned the momentum of that half

[denverMU]

I still don’t understand. I was at the game, they called a foul on Burns, they went to a time out and announced they were reviewing 5he call.  Then they announced a foul on Stevie.  How does that happen?  You can’t change a foul call on review

[Johnny B]

They said they can review “around the cylinder” of burns. Like Stevie was intruding burns space or something idk

[tower912]

The initial call was a charge on Burns.  They reviewed it for a possible flagrant.  Upon review, it was determined that Stevie was in Burns cylinder.   Call reversed.

Jokes:  How big is Burns cylinder?

That was a call that Lions fans are used to.

[MUDPT]

My problem is that Driscoll is literally 2 feet from the play. If he can’t make the correct call the first time, he shouldn’t be reffing. Or let’s just go completely video refs.

[cheebs09]

Should have been a T on Burns for how he reacted. Completely turned the momentum of that half

I thought that's what they were reviewing at first. Usually tossing the ball at the cheerleaders like that is a T.

[TSmith34, Inc.]

Watching at a bar where the sound was somewhat drowned out, I assumed it was a flagrant review for the viciousness with which Burns swung his elbow into Stevie quite intentionally.

I thought for the most part the referring was pretty good yesterday, mostly invisible. That one, however, incomprehensible.

[The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole]

Multiple times this year I've heard them say they can't reverse the call when doing a review. Either the refs have been wrong all year long, or that call was blown.

According to the rule book, if you are looking at a foul to determine if it’s a flagrant, and it is determined that no flagrant occurred, refs can penalize additional common fouls on either team.

However, they can’t determine that another violation took place, like a travel.