Tucker

[Uncle Rico]

As anyone on Twitter knows, Twitter isn’t the real world.

[Not A Serious Person]

Yeah ... as already has been pointed out several times now, you don't understand the difference between TV ratings and Twitter views. Or, maybe you do know and you're conflating them disingenuously.
Either way, you're wrong.

When you have nothing else, screaming "wrong" and attacking me.

But to move the conversation beyond you.

The problem with viewers on Cable TV is the audience is self-selecting to validate their viewpoint. So, the influence is very limited, no matter the size.

A social media site opens it to millions of people who would never watch a cable TV show. And even if the video starts playing automatically, over the next several months, tens and tens of millions of people will watch some or all of a show they never considered before. So this reach is vastly more. His influence is much greater.

Views on social media are power full than viewership on cable TV. It is the opposite of the Sultan post above.

----

(please try and make the personal attack in your response a little more creative than mindlessly screaming "wrong!")

[MU82]

Did you wipe the ky off both hands before this (now 8 1/2-year-old) personal attack?

You view me poking fun at your recommendation to sell AAPL 8+ years ago -- something you've poked fun at yourself for over the years -- as a "personal attack"?

What do you consider the term "circle jerk" to be? A bouquet?

Still, it was fun to watch you and your buddies take part in a circle jerk right after you basically challenged your "attackers" to take part in one. Lotsa circle-jerkin' 'round these parts! Not sure they make enough KY!!!

[Uncle Rico]

You view me poking fun at your recommendation to sell AAPL 8+ years ago -- something you've poked fun at yourself for over the years -- as a "personal attack"?

What do you consider the term "circle jerk" to be? A bouquet?

Still, it was fun to watch you and your buddies take part in a circle jerk right after you basically challenged your "attackers" to take part in one. Lotsa circle-jerkin' 'round these parts! Not sure they make enough KY!!!

You own Apple?  Don’t you know where those products are made?

[The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole]

Are you quoting a conservative Wausau radio station not understanding the difference between TV viewers and Twitter views as evidence that you don't also not understand the difference between TV viewers and Twitter views?

Yeah, all this proves is that a lot of people seemingly don't understand the Twitter views metric.

[Not A Serious Person]

Are you quoting a conservative Wausau radio station not understanding the difference between TV viewers and Twitter views as evidence that you don't also not understand the difference between TV viewers and Twitter views?

But it is ok for Sultan to quote a far-left progressive site that says the opposite? That should go unquestioned in your world.

A typical pattern, attack me, attack the writer, attack the site, never the facts.

Are they lying when it has 172 million views? And if not (hint they are not), what does that mean? More people have watched some or all of this documentary than any other documentary in history. It upsets you because it is not a progressive documentary. If it were, you would celebrate these statistics.

So here is an inconvenient idea for you ... Twitter views are more powerful than cable TV viewers.

So just assume viewers matter more than views, it is a assumption you want to be true.

[Not A Serious Person]

You view me poking fun at your recommendation to sell AAPL 8+ years ago -- something you've poked fun at yourself for over the years -- as a "personal attack"?

What do you consider the term "circle jerk" to be? A bouquet?

Still, it was fun to watch you and your buddies take part in a circle jerk right after you basically challenged your "attackers" to take part in one. Lotsa circle-jerkin' 'round these parts! Not sure they make enough KY!!!

Man, this is weak; consider rewriting it.

[Not A Serious Person]

Yeah, all this proves is that a lot of people seemingly don't understand the Twitter views metric.

And neither do you ... ad you assume a TV viewer matters more than a Twitter view.

[The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole]

And neither do you ... ad you assume a TV viewer matters more than a Twitter view.

You are the one comparing Twitter views to television viewership. I understand they aren't comparable. You apparently do not.

(Sorry if you view this as a personal attack.)

[Pakuni]

(please try and make the personal attack in your response a little more creative than mindlessly screaming "wrong!")

KY, circle jerks and getting on your knees = intelligent discourse.
Pointing out your many errors = personal attack.

Again, not a serious person. (That may be a personal attack, but it's also a statement of fact).

[jficke13]

@bennyjohnson 3h
Tucker broke the corporate media monopoly matrix tonight & it’s never coming back.

Tucker uploaded a 10 min monologue.
No ads or interruptions.
No pricy subscriptions.
Watch on demand.

The result?

- 17M views
- 90K RTs
- 25K comments

In under 180 mins

Benny Johnson, really?

Tokyo Rose had a better sense of objective reality than that guy.

[Pakuni]

Benny Johnson, really?

Tokyo Rose had a better sense of objective reality than that guy.

Sultan linked Yahoo News, so pretty much the same thing.

[MUBurrow]

But it is ok for Sultan to quote a far-left progressive site that says the opposite? That should go unquestioned in your world.

A typical pattern, attack me, attack the writer, attack the site, never the facts.

Are they lying when it has 172 million views? And if not (hint they are not), what does that mean? More people have watched some or all of this documentary than any other documentary in history. It upsets you because it is not a progressive documentary. If it were, you would celebrate these statistics.

So here is an inconvenient idea for you ... Twitter views are more powerful than cable TV viewers.

So just assume viewers matter more than views, it is a assumption you want to be true.

I mean dude - you posted a non-sequitor article from a former Republican field organizer who now works at a Wausau conservative radio station that was published during pride month about how a Daily Wire documentary about gender ideology is one of the most popular documentaries of all time based solely on Twitter views... in the same thread that you have routinely invoked the term "circle jerk." 

Then you claimed pointing that out is an ad hominem attack and isn't "attacking the facts."

[The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole]

But it is ok for Sultan to quote a far-left progressive site that says the opposite? That should go unquestioned in your world.

The article was written by Ross Lincoln - he's an entertainment reporter.

Are they lying when it has 172 million views? And if not (hint they are not), what does that mean? More people have watched some or all of this documentary than any other documentary in history. It upsets you because it is not a progressive documentary. If it were, you would celebrate these statistics.

No that's not what it means.

So here is an inconvenient idea for you ... Twitter views are more powerful than cable TV viewers.

No because they aren't the same thing.

This is why you get dunked on A LOT. Not only are you repeatedly wrong, but when it is pointed out HOW you are wrong, you keep insisting you are right.