collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Pope Leo XIV by Uncle Rico
[Today at 07:56:43 AM]


Proposed rule changes( coaching challenges) by The Sultan
[Today at 07:45:52 AM]


Ethan Johnston to Marquette by Spotcheck Billy
[May 10, 2025, 10:16:15 PM]


Kam update by #UnleashSean
[May 09, 2025, 10:29:30 PM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by MuMark
[May 09, 2025, 03:09:00 PM]


OT MU adds swimming program by The Sultan
[May 09, 2025, 12:10:04 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Is the NCAA tournament a "crapshoot"

Yes
111 (72.1%)
No
43 (27.9%)

Total Members Voted: 154

WhiteTrash

The numbers over the years prove it is not a classic crapshoot, but as mentioned before it is far from a guaranty that the best team will win every game. I can't think of any other tournament / playoff  in any sport that is any different.

Are the World Cup, NFL Playoffs and The Masters a crapshoot?

brewcity77

Because it's a crapshoot is why we could've won this. Because no team in the country was decidedly better than us.

MU82

Quote from: WhiteTrash on March 27, 2023, 04:25:00 PM
The numbers over the years prove it is not a classic crapshoot, but as mentioned before it is far from a guaranty that the best team will win every game. I can't think of any other tournament / playoff  in any sport that is any different.

The NBA playoffs haven't really been crapshooty over the years, as the 3-4 teams generally considered the "best" tend to be represented in the NBA Finals. All series are best-of-7, so even if a really good team slips up a time or two and loses to a lesser team, the format favors the better team. It's been many years since the NBA champion wasn't regarded as truly one of the league's top teams going into the playoffs.

Even though the NHL playoffs are best-of-7, a hot goalie can produce a string of upsets - enough to be crapshooty in nature.

Baseball's not quite as much, though again a hot pitcher and/or couple of hot batters can carry an underdog. The way pitching goes now, it's not as easy to have a hot-pitcher scenario, though. There are more postseason games now, and pitchers only rarely work more often than every 5th day. Once upon a time, guys like Gibson, Koufax and even Viola, Morris and Randy Johnson would pitch three times in a 7-game series and work deep into games. Of course, if the stud pitcher like those named were on the best team, I guess one could hypothesize that makes things even more crapshooty now.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Babybluejeans

Take a look at the tourney winners ya ding dongs. A single-game elimination tournament with 68/64 teams will necessarily produce outliers. But this list forecloses any argument it's "crapshoot":

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_men%27s_basketball_champions

5DollarPitcher

Quote from: WhiteTrash on March 27, 2023, 04:25:00 PM
The numbers over the years prove it is not a classic crapshoot, but as mentioned before it is far from a guaranty that the best team will win every game. I can't think of any other tournament / playoff  in any sport that is any different.

Are the World Cup, NFL Playoffs and The Masters a crapshoot?
Correct

5DollarPitcher

Quote from: Babybluejeans on March 27, 2023, 05:15:06 PM
Take a look at the tourney winners ya ding dongs. A single-game elimination tournament with 68/64 teams will necessarily produce outliers. But this list forecloses any argument it's "crapshoot":

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_men%27s_basketball_champions
Correct

Goose

It is more of a crapshoot than ever. All you can do is put yourself in position for success on a regular basis. The more at bats a program gets, the better the chance for success.


brewcity77

Okay, so since kenpom started in 2002, we have pre-tourney champion rankings of...

  • 2002: #4 Maryland
  • 2003: #20 Syracuse
  • 2004: #5 Connecticut
  • 2005: #2 North Carolina
  • 2006: #6 Florida
  • 2007: #3 Florida
  • 2008: #1 Kansas
  • 2009: #3 North Carolina
  • 2010: #2 Duke
  • 2011: #15 Connecticut
  • 2012: #1 Kentucky
  • 2013: #2 Louisville
  • 2014: #25 Connecticut
  • 2015: #6 Duke
  • 2016: #5 Villanova
  • 2017: #3 North Carolina
  • 2018: #2 Villanova
  • 2019: #1 Virginia
  • 2021: #4 Baylor
  • 2022: #6 Kansas
  • 2023: #4 UConn* (at best)
So the average kenpom rank to win the title was 5.71 with teams ranging from 1-25. The #1 overall team won the title 3 times (14.2% of the time), which is just as often as teams ranked 15th or lower won it. So I would stand by that in any given year, there are 5-10 teams that can win it, and in years like this one, that number balloons to 20-30 teams that could win it. If you are trying to crown your best team champion, this is the definition of a crapshoot.

brewcity77

And here are the pre-tourney ranks this year:

#4 UConn
#14 San Diego State
#25 Florida Atlantic
#39 Miami

If UConn doesn't win it, that only further reinforces the crapshoot argument.


Uncle Rico

Quote from: 5DollarPitcher on March 27, 2023, 05:40:16 PM
He was actually correct

No, the tournament is a crapshoot.  I admire your dedication to always being wrong
Guster is for Lovers

5DollarPitcher

Quote from: brewcity77 on March 27, 2023, 05:34:50 PM
Okay, so since kenpom started in 2002, we have pre-tourney champion rankings of...

  • 2002: #4 Maryland
  • 2003: #20 Syracuse
  • 2004: #5 Connecticut
  • 2005: #2 North Carolina
  • 2006: #6 Florida
  • 2007: #3 Florida
  • 2008: #1 Kansas
  • 2009: #3 North Carolina
  • 2010: #2 Duke
  • 2011: #15 Connecticut
  • 2012: #1 Kentucky
  • 2013: #2 Louisville
  • 2014: #25 Connecticut
  • 2015: #6 Duke
  • 2016: #5 Villanova
  • 2017: #3 North Carolina
  • 2018: #2 Villanova
  • 2019: #1 Virginia
  • 2021: #4 Baylor
  • 2022: #6 Kansas
  • 2023: #4 UConn* (at best)
So the average kenpom rank to win the title was 5.71 with teams ranging from 1-25. The #1 overall team won the title 3 times (14.2% of the time), which is just as often as teams ranked 15th or lower won it. So I would stand by that in any given year, there are 5-10 teams that can win it, and in years like this one, that number balloons to 20-30 teams that could win it. If you are trying to crown your best team champion, this is the definition of a crapshoot.
Looks like a hell of a lot of top 10 teams and a couple anomalies still in the top 25.

That's not a crapshoot.

5DollarPitcher

Quote from: Uncle Rico on March 27, 2023, 05:40:58 PM
No, the tournament is a crapshoot.  I admire your dedication to always being wrong
Actually you're wrong bub

Uncle Rico

Quote from: 5DollarPitcher on March 27, 2023, 05:41:43 PM
Actually you're wrong bub

No, I'm right.  Sorry this poll didn't work out like you thought it would. 
Guster is for Lovers

5DollarPitcher

In craps the odds of rolling a 7 (most probable outcome in a field of 12 outcomes) is 16.67%.

If we convert that, using basic math, to a field of 68 teams. The pool of most probable outcomes would be approximately the top 5.7 (call it 6) teams. (Math is 1/12 times field of 68).

Using Brew's own chart - that field of most probable outcomes occurs approximately 86% of the time (if UConn wins this year).

The tournament is factually, statistically, mathematically NOT a crapshoot. Sorry to burst anyone's bubble on that. You've been defeated.

Uncle Rico

Quote from: 5DollarPitcher on March 27, 2023, 05:46:32 PM
In craps the odds of rolling a 7 (most probable outcome in a field of 12 outcomes) is 16.67%.

If we convert that, using basic math, to a field of 68 teams. The pool of most probable outcomes would be approximately the top 5.7 (call it 6) teams. (Math is 1/12 times field of 68).

Using Brew's own chart - that field of most probable outcomes occurs approximately 86% of the team (if UConn wins this year).

The tournament is factually, statistically, mathematically NOT a crapshoot. Sorry to burst anyone's bubble on that. You've been defeated.

No, you're wrong.  The tournament is a crapshoot.
Guster is for Lovers

5DollarPitcher

Quote from: Uncle Rico on March 27, 2023, 05:44:25 PM
No, I'm right.  Sorry this poll didn't work out like you thought it would.
So wrong

5DollarPitcher

Quote from: Uncle Rico on March 27, 2023, 05:48:12 PM
No, you're wrong.  The tournament is a crapshoot.
Math is wrong!! Agh! 😂😂

Uncle Rico

Guster is for Lovers

5DollarPitcher

Quote from: Uncle Rico on March 27, 2023, 05:54:32 PM
No, I'm quite right.
Math is wrong and "Uncle Rico" (cringe movie btw) is right? I'll bet!

Uncle Rico

Quote from: 5DollarPitcher on March 27, 2023, 05:56:45 PM
Math is wrong and "Uncle Rico" (cringe movie btw) is right? I'll bet!

You should.  You'd win if you did.

Guster is for Lovers

5DollarPitcher


NickelDimer

How are you getting trolled this bad by Rico jfc
No Finish Line

Uncle Rico

Quote from: 5DollarPitcher on March 27, 2023, 06:01:06 PM
I don't bet against basic math

The tournament is a crapshoot.  Ask the two Final Four teams who avoided playing a 1 or 2 seed on their way there. 

I admire your conviction of being wrong.  I do appreciate you making this poll, too.  It's been quite amusing
Guster is for Lovers

Previous topic - Next topic