collapse

* Recent Posts

2024 Transfer Portal by JakeBarnes
[Today at 10:15:44 PM]


Shaka interview by We R Final Four
[Today at 09:49:36 PM]


Marquette transfers, this millennium by tower912
[Today at 08:11:30 PM]


Kolek throwing out first pitch at White Sox game by GoldenEagles03
[Today at 12:21:14 PM]


Marquette Football Update by Spotcheck Billy
[Today at 11:11:22 AM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by Herman Cain
[Today at 11:00:09 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!


Author Topic: Super Bowl LVII  (Read 3613 times)

Jockey

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2044
  • “We want to get rid of the ballots"
Re: Super Bowl LVII
« Reply #100 on: February 13, 2023, 09:08:17 AM »
Another nail in the coffin of the woke mob NFL

Marge McSkanky is pissed.

Jockey

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2044
  • “We want to get rid of the ballots"
Re: Super Bowl LVII
« Reply #101 on: February 13, 2023, 09:11:06 AM »
If you don't want a penalty to determine the outcome of a game, then don't commit the penalty.

And I would suggest it is completely unknown if it determined the outcome. The Eagles still would have had to at least get into FG range.

Exactly. We don’t know if it would have decided the result. It simply would have given the Eagles a chance.

I hated the call, but the simple solution is don’t hold.

Herman Cain

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12892
  • 9-9-9
Re: Super Bowl LVII
« Reply #102 on: February 13, 2023, 09:14:35 AM »
The Big Blunder for the Eagles was the fumble return for a touchdown. When teams are evenly matched , plays like that are usually hard to over come .

Mahomes will make a team pay every time they make a mistake like that .
The only mystery in life is why the Kamikaze Pilots wore helmets...
            ---Al McGuire

muwarrior69

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5146
Re: Super Bowl LVII
« Reply #103 on: February 13, 2023, 09:23:30 AM »
Yup. Philly’s defense was the most disappointing unit in the game by a large margin.

What defense? 73 points scored in that game.

pbiflyer

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1750
Re: Super Bowl LVII
« Reply #104 on: February 13, 2023, 09:25:00 AM »
Exactly. We don’t know if it would have decided the result. It simply would have given the Eagles a chance.

I hated the call, but the simple solution is don’t hold.

I bet you could look at that play and find a textbook example of holding on the O line comparable with the defensive hold they called.
It was a bush league call.

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: Super Bowl LVII
« Reply #105 on: February 13, 2023, 09:32:20 AM »
I bet you could look at that play and find a textbook example of holding on the O line comparable with the defensive hold they called.
It was a bush league call.

That may not be holding, actually.
See: Rule 12, Section 1, Article 3, Note 1.i.

Anyhow, the one guy who would have the most legit beef about the call if it were wrong has said it was not wrong.

MUBurrow

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1411
Re: Super Bowl LVII
« Reply #106 on: February 13, 2023, 09:35:04 AM »
For what its worth, I think defensive holding could be called every play, but that specific type of defensive holding gets called every time.  That inside-out route, completely iso in man coverage is an extremely visible, dynamic route.  Plus the release out and up will expose any kind of jersey tug and make it look even worse than it is.  Its not like using an arm to slow a guy down on post 15 yards down the field or something.  I felt a little let down to not get to see the Eagles get the ball back, but its a great play design that kind of intentionally puts the ref in a tough position.

 

feedback