Way to go.

[buckchuckler]

You got a baseball thread locked.  Freaking idiots have to make everything about your little pissing matches.

[real chili 83]

I was thinking the same thing.

[Benny B]

Well, at least the thread made it past the trade deadline.  That’s pretty good in a penultimate election year.

[Benny B]

I haven’t read the last couple pages of the thread, but I’m pretty certain that the two main belligerents who got it locked each started their own new thread.

[#UnleashSean]

One of them did

[TSmith34, Inc.]

Chicos is simply toxic.  Unable to stop pissing in every freaking thread.

[Cheeks]

Chicos is simply toxic.  Unable to stop pissing in every freaking thread.

I didn’t participate in this thread at all, and it was locked

https://www.muscoop.com/index.php?topic=58944.0


There are many others like it, all with the same individual involved.....yet you say nothing.

[Spotcheck Billy]

I didn’t participate in this thread at all, and it was locked

https://www.muscoop.com/index.php?topic=58944.0


There are many others like it, all with the same individual involved.....yet you say nothing.

You should be placed on a 5 posts per day limit or less, too much bickering back and forth.

[Cheeks]

You should be placed on a 5 posts per day limit or less, too much bickering back and forth.

Takes two to tango, right?  I simple ask why the rules are not equally applied.  Bickering has been going on at Scoop since the very beginning, and before that on Juno’s board and Dodd’s board....whether I have been there or not, bickering has been a staple of all of these boards.

[#UnleashSean]

I didn’t participate in this thread at all, and it was locked

https://www.muscoop.com/index.php?topic=58944.0


There are many others like it, all with the same individual involved.....yet you say nothing.

We've asked you both to stop multiple times. At least he's listening.

[Spotcheck Billy]

Takes two to tango, right?  I simple ask why the rules are not equally applied.  Bickering has been going on at Scoop since the very beginning, and before that on Juno’s board and Dodd’s board....whether I have been there or not, bickering has been a staple of all of these boards.

^ This sort of reads like bickering about my post count suggestion...wait....weren't you permanently banned already?

Just finished reading you bickering about the weather in Ann Arbor etc. - wtf does it really matter? You always have to get the last word in and no it wasn't MU82 posting about Ann Arbor. I challenge you to not respond to this post.....

[buckchuckler]

I didn’t participate in this thread at all, and it was locked

https://www.muscoop.com/index.php?topic=58944.0


There are many others like it, all with the same individual involved.....yet you say nothing.

Congratulations.   There was a thread locked that wasn't your fault.  You must be so proud.

[Cheeks]

Congratulations.   There was a thread locked that wasn't your fault.  You must be so proud.

There are a number of threads that fit the bill, locked and all with the same individual involved who isn’t me.  Just the facts.

[wadesworld]

Chicos unhinged, episode 75.

[#UnleashSean]

There are a number of threads that fit the bill, locked and all with the same individual involved who isn’t me.  Just the facts.

So because someone was the reason a couple threads were locked, that excuses your behavior?

[#UnleashSean]

Chicos unhinged, episode 75.

Occasionally I have to take you off mute, this is one of those happy times. You made me chuckle.

[Cheeks]

So because someone was the reason a couple threads were locked, that excuses your behavior?

What behavior is that?  I am responding like anyone else.  Just having a conversation.  Why is it acceptable to have Wades have two or three threads locked in the last few weeks, another person constantly bring up politics at every turn and get threads locked and no one says a word?  I’m generally curious other than agreement in ideology or their take and therefore gets a free pass. 

[buckchuckler]

There are a number of threads that fit the bill, locked and all with the same individual involved who isn’t me.  Just the facts.

Great facts,  but what is the point?  That you're not the only buttface that ruins things for everyone?  Again, congrats.

Is the next step highlighting threads you've participated in that weren't locked?  That would be a testament to your character.

[Cheeks]

Chicos unhinged, episode 75.

LOL. Actually very calm, enjoying the conversation.  When you and Lenny bicker, so what.  When you get threads locked, two in the last few weeks, fine.  Always an interesting Scoop dynamic, but no one is unhinged...a nice relaxing conversation.

[wadesworld]

LOL. Actually very calm, enjoying the conversation.  When you and Lenny bicker, so what.  When you get threads locked, two in the last few weeks, fine.  Always an interesting Scoop dynamic, but no one is unhinged...a nice relaxing conversation.

What two threads have I got locked in the last few weeks?

This is you enjoying a relaxing conversation?  Sheesh!

[Cheeks]

My wife just woke up, big bday for her.  I decorated since 4:30am....going to have a good time with her today to make it special.  Love you all.

 

[Pakuni]

My wife just woke up, big bday for her.  I decorated since 4:30am....going to have a good time with her today to make it special.  Love you all.

 

[#UnleashSean]

The man can do it all.

[D'Lo Brown]

There are a number of threads that fit the bill, locked and all with the same individual involved who isn’t me.  Just the facts.

The thing I've noticed that should be most shocking of all, is that you normally reply to any mention of you in any thread within about 5-10 minutes, at any point of the day. You also tend to reply to any mention of politics within that time frame, alongside a select few other themes that draw your immediate attention.

And I'm not saying that you notice it within 5-10 minutes. I mean that you have already hashed out a few sentences or brief paragraphs, sometimes even including citations, and have sent it out within 5-10 minutes.

The only rate-limiting step for you appears to be when you are mentioned multiple times (or there are multiple political posts), and thus are "forced" to type multiple replies.

Can you explain how you are always able to reply so quickly? And, well, why?

[GB Warrior]

The thing I've noticed that should be most shocking of all, is that you normally reply to any mention of you in any thread within about 5-10 minutes, at any point of the day. You also tend to reply to any mention of politics within that time frame, alongside a select few other themes that draw your immediate attention.

And I'm not saying that you notice it within 5-10 minutes. I mean that you have already hashed out a few sentences or brief paragraphs, sometimes even including citations, and have sent it out within 5-10 minutes.

The only rate-limiting step for you appears to be when you are mentioned multiple times (or there are multiple political posts), and thus are "forced" to type multiple replies.

Can you explain how you are always able to reply so quickly? And, well, why?

 Executive time

[4everwarriors]

Crean fookin' sucks

[real chili 83]

ND sucks

[jesmu84]

What a weird time a few years ago when an alter-ego made a one-off diatribe about how things were too toxic in society and the reflection of that in a message board made it so it was better to not be on here. (After being banned)

[TeamOh]

What a weird time a few years ago when an alter-ego made a one-off diatribe about how things were too toxic in society and the reflection of that in a message board made it so it was better to not be on here. (After being banned)

wasnt that also about how the true love of his life, which he did not marry, was going through a hard time and he was still very in love with her?  and today hes celebrating his wifes birthday...CONGRATS!

[Golden Avalanche]

My wife just woke up, big bday for her.  I decorated since 4:30am....going to have a good time with her today to make it special.  Love you all.

 

You are so unnatural carnal knowledgeing awkward.

[TSmith34, Inc.]

What behavior is that?  I am responding like anyone else.  Just having a conversation.  Why is it acceptable to have Wades have two or three threads locked in the last few weeks, another person constantly bring up politics at every turn and get threads locked and no one says a word?  I’m generally curious other than agreement in ideology or their take and therefore gets a free pass.

Always, always, ALWAYS the victim.

[buckchuckler]

Sorry to have started this thread.  We should probably just kill it.

[DegenerateDish]

Sorry to have started this thread.  We should probably just kill it.

Start a new one called "Way two go."

[buckchuckler]

Start a new one called "Way two go."

Ha! 

[#UnleashSean]

Start a new one called "Way two go."

[Jon]

Crean fookin' sucks

A Newtonian Absolute, Doc.

[Eldon]

Takes two to tango, right?  I simple ask why the rules are not equally applied.  Bickering has been going on at Scoop since the very beginning, and before that on Juno’s board and Dodd’s board....whether I have been there or not, bickering has been a staple of all of these boards.

What difference does it make if the rules are not equally applied?

Scoop isn't a democracy. It's Rocky and Topper's board. They can do what they want with it.

[#UnleashSean]

https://youtu.be/wjqwzFcRTnw

[mu03eng]

The thing I've noticed that should be most shocking of all, is that you normally reply to any mention of you in any thread within about 5-10 minutes, at any point of the day. You also tend to reply to any mention of politics within that time frame, alongside a select few other themes that draw your immediate attention.

And I'm not saying that you notice it within 5-10 minutes. I mean that you have already hashed out a few sentences or brief paragraphs, sometimes even including citations, and have sent it out within 5-10 minutes.

The only rate-limiting step for you appears to be when you are mentioned multiple times (or there are multiple political posts), and thus are "forced" to type multiple replies.

Can you explain how you are always able to reply so quickly? And, well, why?

[Cheeks]

The thing I've noticed that should be most shocking of all, is that you normally reply to any mention of you in any thread within about 5-10 minutes, at any point of the day. You also tend to reply to any mention of politics within that time frame, alongside a select few other themes that draw your immediate attention.

And I'm not saying that you notice it within 5-10 minutes. I mean that you have already hashed out a few sentences or brief paragraphs, sometimes even including citations, and have sent it out within 5-10 minutes.

The only rate-limiting step for you appears to be when you are mentioned multiple times (or there are multiple political posts), and thus are "forced" to type multiple replies.

Can you explain how you are always able to reply so quickly? And, well, why?

 I typically get on Scoop in the morning when I commute to work, at lunch, and at night. There are exceptions, but normally my schedule simply doesn’t permit.  Yes, there are exceptions.  As an example, the political post MU82 started the other day that was open for some time....you don’t see me in there at all.  Many examples like that or I’ll wait hours to respond.  Sometimes, I post right away...it all depends if I happen to be on or not.  Nothing else really to explain, those are usually the times I have available. When I do respond, I respond quickly.  Nothing preplanned as you imply.

[Cheeks]

What two threads have I got locked in the last few weeks?

This is you enjoying a relaxing conversation?  Sheesh!

My fault, only one the last few days.

[Cheeks]

What difference does it make if the rules are not equally applied?

Scoop isn't a democracy. It's Rocky and Topper's board. They can do what they want with it.

Not asking for it to be.  And yes, I know who runs and pays for the board....I even made a donation to them for some of the expenses they incur.  My comments are really toward those that claim to want equal treatment, rules, etc, until they don’t.  It isn’t with mods. TSmith believes that makes me a victim claimer, I would say it makes me a vocal observer of the facts at hand.   

[Cheeks]

wasnt that also about how the true love of his life, which he did not marry, was going through a hard time and he was still very in love with her?  and today hes celebrating his wifes birthday...CONGRATS!

LOL.  She was my high school sweetheart and first love, but let’s not get carried away here or makeup a new set of facts.  I’m happily married 20+ years, but yes that was a blow when she passed.  Who knows what could have been, but that isn’t how life turned out.  Watching a friend die of cancer in her 40’s and mother of a teenager, well that pulls on your heart.  Nothing I am ashamed of, that is for sure.

[wadesworld]

My fault, only one the last few days.

Started out saying 3. Quickly changed it to 2. And now moved it to 1. So less threads locked in the last few weeks than number of times that you’ve been permanently banned...

A pretty easy one to explain as well.

[GB Warrior]

Started out saying 3. Quickly changed it to 2. And now moved it to 1. So less threads locked in the last few weeks than number of times that you’ve been permanently banned...

A pretty easy one to explain as well.

This will always be the thing that gets me about scoop.

[mu_hilltopper]

This will always be the thing that gets me about scoop.

We're all about the page views.

And .. this has run its course.