collapse

* Resources


UDM 4

* Villanova SOTG

No Stud when we lose.
2019-20 Season SoG Tally
Howard11
Anim2
Bailey2
Cain1
McEwen1

'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

Transfer Rule proposal by cheebs09
[Today at 09:21:30 PM]


Fire this coach? by TAMU Garcia
[Today at 08:55:53 PM]


Dwyane Wade by TAMU Garcia
[Today at 08:53:49 PM]


"Big Games" by Johnny B
[Today at 08:53:08 PM]


Recruiting as of 2/15/20 by SaveOD238
[Today at 08:40:02 PM]


Providence #2 by 4everwarriors
[Today at 08:17:05 PM]


Alma mater song before games? by keefe
[Today at 08:12:36 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: @ Providence

Marquette
65
Marquette @

Providence

Date/Time: Feb 22, 2019 - 11:00am
TV: FOX
Schedule for 2019-20
Creighton
73

Author Topic: Running up the score encouraged by NCAA Net Rankings  (Read 878 times)

Cheeks

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5903
  • Hall of Fame Hugger
Running up the score encouraged by NCAA Net Rankings
« on: January 06, 2019, 09:31:04 PM »
Interesting article, not the 10 point cap but the efficiency aspect that may encourage teams to run up the score

https://www.al.com/auburnbasketball/2019/01/sec-coaches-discuss-ncaas-new-net-ranking-system-and-why-it-might-encourage-running-up-the-score.html
"I hate everything about this job except the games, Everything. I don't even get affected anymore by the winning, by the ratings, those things. The trouble is, it will sound like an excuse because we've never won the national championship, but winning just isn't all that important to me.” Al McGuire

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 20657
  • Alan Bykowski
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Running up the score encouraged by NCAA Net Rankings
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2019, 06:53:49 AM »
We've discussed this a bit on here and how the efficiency margins effectively dismiss the 10-point cap, but this is a pretty solid explainer of why Wisconsin is always so favored by these metrics. They absolutely clobber their buy games and their slow pace insures losing margins are never very big.

Cheeks

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5903
  • Hall of Fame Hugger
Re: Running up the score encouraged by NCAA Net Rankings
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2019, 07:41:55 PM »
Another article on this, LSU coach says running up the score encouraged by new formula and easier for schools in lesser conferences to take advantage of the rankings.

https://www.nola.com/lsu/2019/01/lsus-will-wade-on-the-net-rankings-their-formula-is-wrong.html
"I hate everything about this job except the games, Everything. I don't even get affected anymore by the winning, by the ratings, those things. The trouble is, it will sound like an excuse because we've never won the national championship, but winning just isn't all that important to me.” Al McGuire

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 20657
  • Alan Bykowski
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Running up the score encouraged by NCAA Net Rankings
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2019, 08:17:04 PM »
Another article on this, LSU coach says running up the score encouraged by new formula and easier for schools in lesser conferences to take advantage of the rankings.

https://www.nola.com/lsu/2019/01/lsus-will-wade-on-the-net-rankings-their-formula-is-wrong.html

unnatural carnal knowledge that article. First of all, why is MU listed as a "non-Power 5" team (not a thing in CBB) but St John's and Villanova are not? Second, one of the teams they seem to be complaining about is the Houston team that beat LSU. Third, 7 of the 10 schools they mention are either ranked or receiving votes in both the AP & Coaches polls, so maybe tell them these teams don't belong.

And fourth...if you want to see someone gaming the system, LOOK AT LSU! Only 1 road game (loss at Houston). Neutral site games & quality mid majors at home, but few Q1 games, instead stacking Q2s that look like they were always going to be Q2. It's smart, don't get me wrong, but the 12th toughest schedule in the country and only 2 Q1 non-con games? Small schools aren't taking advantage of the system, LSU is. What a load of BS.

Except the part about the efficiency differential. That's a valid point.

 

feedback