Main Menu
collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

NIL Money by tower912
[Today at 04:50:49 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by tower912
[Today at 04:49:57 PM]


Congrats to Royce by DoctorV
[May 24, 2025, 10:38:33 PM]


Let's talk about the roster/recruits w/Shaka by Jay Bee
[May 23, 2025, 08:31:14 PM]


Pearson to MU by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[May 23, 2025, 08:12:08 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

brewcity77

Quote from: Afroman on February 13, 2017, 11:18:05 PM
I love this board. The condescending, elitist, know-it-all pricks really make me miss my MU days.

I guess MU is good-to-go at the forward position for the 2017-18 season. My bad.

MU has three bigs coming in without Cain and a returning PF in Hauser. With Matt in the fold, if our frontcourt next year was Heldt, Froling, Eke, John, and Hauser, we would be better from a depth perspective than we are now. I like Cain. I'm happy we have him. But we are 5 deep at the forward positions without him. I think he has the most upside of the new guys and is our best bet for a breakout frosh, but let's not confuse him with Henry Ellenson.

wadesworld

Quote from: Afroman on February 13, 2017, 11:18:05 PM
I love this board. The condescending, elitist, know-it-all pricks really make me miss my MU days.

I guess MU is good-to-go at the forward position for the 2017-18 season. My bad.

So the only options for a recruit are "most important recruit of the last 20 years" and "not needed?"

Afroman

Quote from: brewcity77 on February 13, 2017, 11:21:30 PM
MU has three bigs coming in without Cain and a returning PF in Hauser. With Matt in the fold, if our frontcourt next year was Heldt, Froling, Eke, John, and Hauser, we would be better from a depth perspective than we are now. I like Cain. I'm happy we have him. But we are 5 deep at the forward positions without him. I think he has the most upside of the new guys and is our best bet for a breakout frosh, but let's not confuse him with Henry Ellenson.

Two of those are projects and Heldt, a D-III player, doesn't count.

brandx

Quote from: brewcity77 on February 13, 2017, 11:21:30 PM
MU has three bigs coming in without Cain and a returning PF in Hauser. With Matt in the fold, if our frontcourt next year was Heldt, Froling, Eke, John, and Hauser, we would be better from a depth perspective than we are now. I like Cain. I'm happy we have him. But we are 5 deep at the forward positions without him. I think he has the most upside of the new guys and is our best bet for a breakout frosh, but let's not confuse him with Henry Ellenson.

Gotta correct you, Brew.

Hauser is a wing - not a power forward. One of the reasons I am more optimistic about next year is that we will have actual power forwards on the team.

MU82

I'll take a crack at the question asked in the opening post.

"Most important incoming player of the last 20 years," if based on actual results we got to see, was Wade. He carried us to the Final Four,  put MU hoops back on the map and is on MU's Mount Rushmore. Really, how could it be anyone else? And that's despite him having to sit out a year.

After that, Henry was pretty darn important. Wojo needed a jolt of credibility for his new program ... and for his first full recruiting class he signed our first Burger Boy in 30 years, a kid Cal and Izzo very much wanted. He, not Bo Ryan, landed the best player in recent Wisconsin prep history. Pretty important incoming player.

After that, sure, it's a matter if Cain turns out to be something. If so, he might be in the mix with Diener and a few of the others mentioned earlier, including Markus.

Just IMHO, of course.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Afroman

Wade sat out his first year. And, when he was an "incoming player," no one dreamed that he would be the player that he turned out to be.

Billy Hoyle

Quote from: MU82 on February 13, 2017, 11:45:09 PM
I'll take a crack at the question asked in the opening post.

"Most important incoming player of the last 20 years," if based on actual results we got to see, was Wade. He carried us to the Final Four,  put MU hoops back on the map and is on MU's Mount Rushmore. Really, how could it be anyone else? And that's despite him having to sit out a year.

After that, Henry was pretty darn important. Wojo needed a jolt of credibility for his new program ... and for his first full recruiting class he signed our first Burger Boy in 30 years, a kid Cal and Izzo very much wanted. He, not Bo Ryan, landed the best player in recent Wisconsin prep history. Pretty important incoming player.

After that, sure, it's a matter if Cain turns out to be something. If so, he might be in the mix with Diener and a few of the others mentioned earlier, including Markus.

Just IMHO, of course.

When everyone in that class signed Wade was the lowest rated. Merritt was the most important in that class: a top rated local kid who came to MU over better programs like Pitt when kids like him left Milwaukee.

That said, Novak was the most important. Top 30 local recruit, heavily recruited nationally. Crean beat out Bucky, Illinois and Florida, this before he took MU to the tourney for the first time.

Oh, and if not for Travis and Merritt MU loses to Holy Cross and/or Mizzou since Wade didn't show up in the 2003 tourney until the second half of the Pitt game
"Kevin thinks 'mother' is half a word." - Mike Deane

tower912

You ask a question.   Several people answer the question differently than you would have.    Ergo, they are condescending pricks.    Wow.   
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

KampusFoods

Quote from: GoldenEagles32 on February 13, 2017, 10:43:40 PM
Agree, if Joey commits then i would totally go with Sam

If Joey commits, I'd probably pick Joey over Sam.

The Lens

Theo John might be the most important as he supposedly plays defense.  That would bring the number of defenders in the program to 1.

Hope he's up for the challenge.
The Teal Train has left the station and Lens is day drinking in the bar car.    ---- Dr. Blackheart

History is so valuable if you have the humility to learn from it.    ---- Shaka Smart

GoldenDieners32

Quote from: The Lens on February 14, 2017, 08:56:45 AM
Theo John might be the most important as he supposedly plays defense.  That would bring the number of defenders in the program to 1.

Hope he's up for the challenge.
saw his highlights he is solid

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

Quote from: The Lens on February 14, 2017, 08:56:45 AM
Theo John might be the most important as he supposedly plays defense.  That would bring the number of defenders in the program to 1.

Hope he's up for the challenge.

John can really play some D.  Watched him play MG last week.  Didn't do much offensively, but he is serious force to reckoned with under the basket defensively.  Also looks like he is a damn body builder.  He is immediately going to make a difference for us defensively.   

edit: *MG is Maple Grove for you Sconnies*
Quote from: Goose on February 09, 2017, 11:06:04 AM
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

willie warrior

Quote from: brandx on February 13, 2017, 11:43:50 PM
Gotta correct you, Brew.

Hauser is a wing - not a power forward. One of the reasons I am more optimistic about next year is that we will have actual power forwards on the team.
Wow. I agree with brandi. Hauser is not a pf.
Hell, in some games wojo how ski plays him at the post for several minutes. Hauser is neither and it is a mistake to play him there.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

Quote from: willie warrior on February 14, 2017, 09:56:30 AM
Wow. I agree with brandi. Hauser is not a pf.
Hell, in some games wojo how ski plays him at the post for several minutes. Hauser is neither and it is a mistake to play him there.

Well we're not exactly flush with options.  Next year will be different, and I bet Sam splits him time between the 3 and 4.
Quote from: Goose on February 09, 2017, 11:06:04 AM
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

GGGG

Quote from: willie warrior on February 14, 2017, 09:56:30 AM
Wow. I agree with brandi. Hauser is not a pf.
Hell, in some games wojo how ski plays him at the post for several minutes. Hauser is neither and it is a mistake to play him there.



They went on their run against Nova without Luke or Heldt on the floor.  It makes sense in certain match up situations, but you are correct that those should be the exception.

brewcity77

Quote from: brandx on February 13, 2017, 11:43:50 PM
Gotta correct you, Brew.

Hauser is a wing - not a power forward. One of the reasons I am more optimistic about next year is that we will have actual power forwards on the team.

Hauser is a natural wing, but I was referencing both where he is this year and where he can play. If we go into next year with Sam getting some minutes at the 4, it won't be a problem. My point was that we have depth at the forward positions and multiple guys to play both spots with or without Cain.

mu_hilltopper

Quote from: Afroman on February 13, 2017, 11:18:05 PM
I love this board. The condescending, elitist, know-it-all pricks really make me miss my MU days.


For the record, I agree with you here.  I thought the OP was a legit question. 

Looks like some people woke up on the wrong side of the bed today.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

#42
Quote from: Afroman on February 13, 2017, 11:18:05 PM
I love this board. The condescending, elitist, know-it-all pricks really make me miss my MU days.

I guess MU is good-to-go at the forward position for the 2017-18 season. My bad.

Cain isn't a forward. He's intriguing because he has the size to guard the 1-4 positions. He has the body to be a defensive stopper that mu desperately needs. No idea if he has the skill.

I actually don't think Cain is the best player coming in next year. I think it's Froling. Kid with his size and skill is very hard to come by.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


MU82

Quote from: Afroman on February 13, 2017, 11:49:33 PM
Wade sat out his first year. And, when he was an "incoming player," no one dreamed that he would be the player that he turned out to be.

I acknowledged that Wade sat out his first year in my comment.

I dreamed he could be great. I saw him play as a HS senior against Eddy Curry's team and he absolutely dominated; 35 pts IIRC. I called all of my MU friends and said, "We've got a great one here." I was hardly clairvoyant; by that time, Wade was very well-known.

And yes, I also acknowledge that I am operating from 20/20 hindsight. Based on what we went on to know, Wade unquestionably was the most important recruit over the last 20 years. Based on what we knew at the time of the recruitment - in other words, where Cain is right now - I defer to others who follow that stuff more than I do.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

GoldenDieners32

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on February 14, 2017, 10:17:22 AM
Cain isn't a forward. He's intriguing because he has the size to guard the 1-4 positions. He has the body to be a defensive stopper that mu desperately needs. No idea if he has the skill.

I actually don't think Cain is the best player coming in next year. I think it's Froling. Kid with his size and skill is very hard to come by.
Hopefully cain buys into playing tough defense

MU82

I only hope Cain is abel.

Now THAT, my friends, is high comedy! One might even say it's biblical!!
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

GGGG

Quote from: MU82 on February 14, 2017, 11:15:56 AM
I only hope Cain is abel.

Now THAT, my friends, is high comedy! One might even say it's biblical!!


Does Marquette realize they admitted the murderer?  (Which is probably better than admitting the dead guy.)

Earl Tatum

We have to land Elliott for next year. That would be 3 from Michigan and
1 from Minn. Don't care about the schollies, but 2018 we have Bailey,
land Joey and Race Thompson, and or TJ Moss or Dosunmu we will have
a decent team. Now get some decent assistants, excluding Johnson and
a strengthening coach. I don't care how it comes out, JUST DO IT!
Enough of this screwing around. With all the money being spent on the
BB program and we are nothing more than a mid-major right now. Like
it or not. Pisses me off. WARRIORS, WARRIORS, WARRIORS. We are
Marquette.

hairy worthen

Quote from: Afroman on February 13, 2017, 11:18:05 PM
I love this board. The condescending, elitist, know-it-all pricks really make me miss my MU days.

I guess MU is good-to-go at the forward position for the 2017-18 season. My bad.

Best post I have seen on here in a long time. We'll done

Dawson Rental

Quote from: Afroman on February 13, 2017, 10:40:43 PM
The program is mired in mediocrity. To get it turned around, I would think that the program would need a jolt from the incoming players. If these incoming recruits are being viewed at as "role players," it doesn't give me a lot of hope.

The nice thing about role playing freshmen, they tend to stick around for four years and develop, sometimes into something special.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Previous topic - Next topic