collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by MuMark
[Today at 11:47:00 AM]


Congrats to Royce by DoctorV
[May 24, 2025, 10:38:33 PM]


Let's talk about the roster/recruits w/Shaka by Jay Bee
[May 23, 2025, 08:31:14 PM]


Pearson to MU by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[May 23, 2025, 08:12:08 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

GGGG

Do I think Wojo is a good coach?  Yes.

Do I think he is good enough to get Marquette where Buzz and TC did?  Not at this point.

Do I think he has improved?  Yes.

Do I think he can improve further?  God I hope so.

rocky_warrior

Quote from: Dr. Vinnie Boombatz on February 01, 2017, 09:19:10 PM
Do I think he is good enough to get Marquette where Buzz and TC did?  Not at this point.

Not that I intend to ignite a Wojo vs. Buzz debate.  But fully acknowledging this will.  Buzz got clobbered by Virginia tonight, and despite all the early bellyaching that Buzz was doing better in his 3rd year than Wojo...

Both teams are 5-5 in conference.  Marquette is about 10 spots better in KenPom (40 vs 52), and Marquette has played a harder schedule (by both RPI and Kenpom).    So, would Buzz really do better with this team?  I have my doubts.

ecompt

This team would be vastly different had Buzz stayed and been allowed to keep doing what he had been doing. We'd probably have three or four JUCOs.

rocky_warrior

Quote from: ecompt on February 01, 2017, 09:37:29 PM
This team would be vastly different had Buzz stayed and been allowed to keep doing what he had been doing. We'd probably have three or four JUCOs.

OK.  So lets assume he can only do what he's doing at VT?  Fair?

ecompt

Quote from: rocky_warrior on February 01, 2017, 09:41:23 PM
OK.  So lets assume he can only do what he's doing at VT?  Fair?

Absolutely. Buzz is a quick-fix guy, Wojo is (MU hopes) a long-term guy. Buzz knew the kind of players you need to compete in this conference. Wojo is learning.

rocky_warrior

Quote from: ecompt on February 01, 2017, 09:45:55 PM
Absolutely. Buzz is a quick-fix guy, Wojo is (MU hopes) a long-term guy. Buzz knew the kind of players you need to compete in this conference. Wojo is learning.

I agree about Wojo.  So is Buzz still learning in the ACC?  Why isn't his team better already?

Lennys Tap

Quote from: rocky_warrior on February 01, 2017, 09:47:20 PM
I agree about Wojo.  So is Buzz still learning in the ACC?  Why isn't his team better already?

Way tougher conference, way weaker and lower visibility program. (I know he chose to be there but it's still true).

rocky_warrior

#57
Quote from: Lennys Tap on February 01, 2017, 09:50:53 PM
Way tougher conference, way weaker and lower visibility program. (I know he chose to be there but it's still true).

VPIs conference schedule SO FAR is not way tougher than Marquette's.  Maybe a little tougher. Though it gets tougher for them, and easier for us.

ecompt

I would think at this point VT is better suited to contend for a tournament bid year after year because Buzz will go after (and sign) the JUCO guys. Next year's freshman class is huge for Wojo.

GoldenDieners32

Quote from: ecompt on February 01, 2017, 09:45:55 PM
Absolutely. Buzz is a quick-fix guy, Wojo is (MU hopes) a long-term guy. Buzz knew the kind of players you need to compete in this conference. Wojo is learning.
I'll give him another year if he doesn't figure it out by then..

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: ecompt on February 01, 2017, 09:37:29 PM
This team would be vastly different had Buzz stayed and been allowed to keep doing what he had been doing. We'd probably have three or four JUCOs.

We've been over this. What JUCOs? Please point them out. There have been maybe 5-10 JUCOs in the last three years that would be starters on this team.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


vogue65

All I  can say is that it was worse in person.   Most, no all the players were frustrated as was the coach.  Now St. Johns beat the team that beat the team, we had a target on our behind from the start of the game, you could feel it in The Garden.   We were either flat-footed or out of control, we lacked character, St. Johns set the pace all night. 
Why did we try to drive against a faster team with more length?
They really packed it in under the basket and we kept driving, geeze.
What happened to paint touches and kick out?  Why not open up the 3 point strength first and open up the driving lanes with the 3 point game?
I have never seen so many blocked shots against MU in my life, and I'm  old.

brewcity77

Quote from: ecompt on February 01, 2017, 09:37:29 PM
This team would be vastly different had Buzz stayed and been allowed to keep doing what he had been doing. We'd probably have three or four JUCOs.

Vastly different? I agree with that. Three or four JUCOs? Unlikely. Buzz would have to be getting by on traditional transfers and high school talent. Would he have figured it out? Probably, but I don't think it'd be nearly the smooth sailing some think. I don't think he'd have made the tourney in 2015 either, and am not convinced he'd be any further ahead than where we are now.

GGGG

I think Buzz may have spoiled us with Juco success.  It isn't that easy.

In his six years here, he had four Juco transfers make the NBA.  I would guess that is unprecedented.

MU82

Quote from: GoldenEagles32 on February 01, 2017, 10:29:53 PM
I'll give him another year if he doesn't figure it out by then..

And then what? He has to try to get by somehow without the all-important GoldenEagles32 endorsement?

Oh, the humanity!
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

mu03eng

Quote from: vogue65 on February 01, 2017, 11:28:23 PM
All I  can say is that it was worse in person.   Most, no all the players were frustrated as was the coach.  Now St. Johns beat the team that beat the team, we had a target on our behind from the start of the game, you could feel it in The Garden.   We were either flat-footed or out of control, we lacked character, St. Johns set the pace all night. 
Why did we try to drive against a faster team with more length?
They really packed it in under the basket and we kept driving, geeze.
What happened to paint touches and kick out?  Why not open up the 3 point strength first and open up the driving lanes with the 3 point game?
I have never seen so many blocked shots against MU in my life, and I'm  old.

They had to drive, St John's was overplaying on the perimeter giving the lane to the basketball. The problem was the players continued to the rim/shot blockers instead of looking for kicks and/or taking mid-range jumpers.

But more importantly the offense really wasn't the issue, it was the defense.

Image of our interior defense:
"A Plan? Oh man, I hate plans. That means were gonna have to do stuff. Can't we just have a strategy......or a mission statement."

GoldenDieners32

We need this game at depaul

Loose Cannon

Quote from: GoldenEagles32 on February 03, 2017, 08:11:05 AM
We need this game at depaul

Yep, I think after the Nova Win, our Belly was Full, and we were not hungry the last two games.  I think the Hunger is Back.
" Love is Space and Time measured by the Heart. "  M Proust

Lennys Tap

Quote from: rocky_warrior on February 01, 2017, 09:54:54 PM
VPIs conference schedule SO FAR is not way tougher than Marquette's.  Maybe a little tougher. Though it gets tougher for them, and easier for us.

You are correct, Rocky.

Frenns Liquor Depot

Quote from: Loose Cannon on February 03, 2017, 05:36:13 PM
Yep, I think after the Nova Win, our Belly was Full, and we were not hungry the last two games.  I think the Hunger is Back.

If this is true I would really question if we are on the right path.

vogue65

Quote from: Loose Cannon on February 03, 2017, 05:36:13 PM
Yep, I think after the Nova Win, our Belly was Full, and we were not hungry the last two games.  I think the Hunger is Back.

Interesting, but I  take a contrarian position, I  think our competition was jacked.  They had an opportunity to beat the team that just beat the number one team, that seemed to be tremendous motivation for St Johns.  They played far above their usual level, plus they had a great game plan.   Look for a press from here on out, that is the book on MU.  Slow Marquette down and you have a chance.

Loose Cannon

Quote from: Frenns Liquor Depot on February 04, 2017, 02:30:59 AM
If this is true I would really question if we are on the right path.

Human Nature,  people tend to lose the same focus intensity needed for the next game.  Most teams are susceptible to this hence "Trap Games."   
" Love is Space and Time measured by the Heart. "  M Proust

Loose Cannon

Quote from: vogue65 on February 04, 2017, 05:03:08 AM
Interesting, but I  take a contrarian position, I  think our competition was jacked.  They had an opportunity to beat the team that just beat the number one team, that seemed to be tremendous motivation for St Johns.  They played far above their usual level, plus they had a great game plan.   Look for a press from here on out, that is the book on MU.  Slow Marquette down and you have a chance.

You're probably right.  Intensity wise we were coming down and they were going up.

What do you see happening in todays game.

Will we be able to play fast?

Will we be able to Break their Press?

I'm saying Yes and I'm unanimous in That.
" Love is Space and Time measured by the Heart. "  M Proust

amen426

Quote from: vogue65 on February 04, 2017, 05:03:08 AM
Interesting, but I  take a contrarian position, I  think our competition was jacked.  They had an opportunity to beat the team that just beat the number one team, that seemed to be tremendous motivation for St Johns.  They played far above their usual level, plus they had a great game plan.   Look for a press from here on out, that is the book on MU.  Slow Marquette down and you have a chance.

Please stop saying that they had extra motivation because we beat Villanova a week ago. That's not a thing.

St Johns didn't play FAR ABOVE their usual level. St Johns has already beaten Syracuse (by 33) and Butler this season. They are 5-6 in conference play after that win. Let's not completely dismiss them because of their poor overall record. They have talent on that team. The loss had nothing to do with the fact that we had a target on our backs because of the Nova game. We just didn't match their intensity.

Outside of Marquette fans, no one even thinks about that Villanova game anymore. 3 of the top 4 teams in the country got knocked off that very same night. It happens all the time.

Teams/fanbases get excited to play the #1 team in the country. They don't get extra motivation to play the team that beat the #1 team in the country.

That's not a thing.

Frenns Liquor Depot

Quote from: Loose Cannon on February 04, 2017, 10:09:15 AM
Human Nature,  people tend to lose the same focus intensity needed for the next game.  Most teams are susceptible to this hence "Trap Games."

We had one good week where we beat two teams better than us - after not making many statements in the non-con & conference season to date...if that is enough success for the team to 'lose their hunger' or intensity for two games then I stand by my statement.

I look forward to the day where we are good enough for trap games or teams excited to try to knock us off - sadly though right now we are a winnable game for most and that is probably the source of the motivation....that and our defense is bad.

Previous topic - Next topic