collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by MuMark
[Today at 12:58:18 PM]


Congrats to Royce by Shaka Shart
[Today at 11:59:34 AM]


Let's talk about the roster/recruits w/Shaka by Jay Bee
[May 23, 2025, 08:31:14 PM]


Pearson to MU by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[May 23, 2025, 08:12:08 PM]


2026 Bracketology by Jay Bee
[May 23, 2025, 07:56:46 AM]


NM by rocky_warrior
[May 23, 2025, 01:50:02 AM]


Scouting Report: Ian Miletic by mug644
[May 22, 2025, 11:29:22 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Fred Garvin


Vander Blue Man Group


forgetful

Ok, now I can go have my heart attack.

Vander Blue Man Group


TSmith34, Inc.

If you think for one second that I am comparing the USA to China you have bumped your hard.

Stretchdeltsig

Great great win.  But, seriously, how can we get Anderson fired for his always rooting for the other team announcing.  He ruins the games.

MattyWarrior

How does Delgado get 17 rebounds and only two fouls, bad, bad officials

Mr. Sand-Knit

They won and that all that matters, some times a young team needs a win like this to start building confidence.

With that said Rodriquez has now beaten us on the right side on free theows like 15 times in an Fin!!! Row!!! Toughen the F up rinhardt n jjj!!!!
Political free board, plz leave your clever quips in your clever mind.


Stretchdeltsig


blikemike2

That one deserved to be seen by 17,000, nonetheless big win. I'm worn out.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: Stretchdeltsig on January 11, 2017, 08:21:09 PM
Anderson is a terrible announcer.  He always roots for the other team that plays the Brewers or Marquette.  Please fire him.

Glad I wasn't the only one who thought this.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


wadesworld

#162
Quote from: PFsHeroes32 on January 11, 2017, 08:09:00 PM
4 years of being a unnatural carnal knowledgeing joke

I'm not being negative

I'm stating goddamn facts

Kewl.

Noticed you had nothing to say during the overtime...except when we missed a free throw.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

I peaked over at Holy Land of Hoops and the Seton Hall fans contend that if the refs called the game even remotely fair than Seton Hall would have won by double digits.

It is always funny how the refs are always against every fan's team.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


ATL MU Warrior

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 12, 2017, 07:27:53 AM
I peaked over at Holy Land of Hoops and the Seton Hall fans contend that if the refs called the game even remotely fair than Seton Hall would have won by double digits.

It is always funny how the refs are always against every fan's team.
That's laughable.  Last night was one game where I thought the refs were very poor but certainly not in the way Hall fans are thinking.

brewcity77

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 12, 2017, 07:27:53 AM
I peaked over at Holy Land of Hoops and the Seton Hall fans contend that if the refs called the game even remotely fair than Seton Hall would have won by double digits.

It is always funny how the refs are always against every fan's team.

Marquette was called for 4 more fouls and SHU went to the line 6 more times. Not really sure where their gripe is  :o

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: brewcity77 on January 12, 2017, 08:13:47 AM
Marquette was called for 4 more fouls and SHU went to the line 6 more times. Not really sure where their gripe is  :o

The main three that I saw were the Carrington charge, Delgado getting called for a travel after being fouled (the one travel they called on him all night despite him not taking a dribble all game), and Delgado not getting the call in OT when the ball went out of bounds to Marquette.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


brewcity77

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 12, 2017, 08:21:35 AM
The main three that I saw were the Carrington charge, Delgado getting called for a travel after being fouled (the one travel they called on him all night despite him not taking a dribble all game), and Delgado not getting the call in OT when the ball went out of bounds to Marquette.

Was that the one the officials reviewed? I remember one that looked really close but was called in our favor. They never replayed it at the BC, but I immediately thought the best part of the play was that as they reviewed it, the original call on the floor was in our favor.

Honestly, I thought the refs were at their worst in our regard in the first half. Lots of contact uncalled down low, while every ticky-tack little thing went against us. Foul disparity at the half had to be 12-6 or so.

wadesworld

Quote from: brewcity77 on January 12, 2017, 09:08:36 AM
Was that the one the officials reviewed? I remember one that looked really close but was called in our favor. They never replayed it at the BC, but I immediately thought the best part of the play was that as they reviewed it, the original call on the floor was in our favor.

Honestly, I thought the refs were at their worst in our regard in the first half. Lots of contact uncalled down low, while every ticky-tack little thing went against us. Foul disparity at the half had to be 12 was 13-6 or so.

FIFY.

And let's keep in mind SH was fouling to put us on the line in regulation and OT, so the foul and FT discrepancy was really even bigger than the final numbers show.

brewcity77

Thanks, wades. I remember looking up and seeing it at 10-6 in the BC, but they stop tallying team fouls once you get to the double bonus, and I knew we had at least a couple more after that.

fjm

Watching the replay on FSWisconsin right now.
Man I hope we win that way nobody posts negative stuff all day on Scoop.  ;D

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: brewcity77 on January 12, 2017, 09:08:36 AM
Was that the one the officials reviewed? I remember one that looked really close but was called in our favor. They never replayed it at the BC, but I immediately thought the best part of the play was that as they reviewed it, the original call on the floor was in our favor.

Honestly, I thought the refs were at their worst in our regard in the first half. Lots of contact uncalled down low, while every ticky-tack little thing went against us. Foul disparity at the half had to be 12-6 or so.

It was. They weren't mad that it went to us. They were bad that they didn't call a foul on us before that.

It is what is. We thought Seton Hall was commiting a ton of over the backs and we were playing really good inferior defense. They thought that their guys were grabbing perfectly legal rebounds and that we were hacking them in the post. Truth is probably somewhere in the middle. Though as the home team it should go more towards our side ;D
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


Dr. Blackheart

The refs went to security a few times last night to watch certain seats who were barking.

Previous topic - Next topic