collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Pearson to MU by MuMark
[Today at 03:29:38 PM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by Nukem2
[Today at 03:11:32 PM]


Mid-season grades by Jay Bee
[Today at 02:05:55 PM]


Kam update by MUbiz
[Today at 01:53:14 PM]


NIL Money by The Sultan
[Today at 01:03:40 PM]


Marquette/Indiana Finalizing Agreement by PointWarrior
[Today at 09:52:07 AM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by brewcity77
[May 12, 2025, 08:53:49 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

wadesworld

Quote from: bilsu on January 19, 2016, 02:35:37 PM
They are not an NCAA tournament team this year or next year, even if Ellenson comes back

Lol.

mug644

Quote from: chapman on January 19, 2016, 06:07:12 PM
Not this year.  Yes, next year.  Buzz isn't the coach, so most players will develop and show marked improvement year over year.

I suppose one could argue that Duane and JJJ are not showing the development that Coach Wojo should bring. Maybe Sandy.

It's not just about the coach.

bilsu

One of the reasons why I do not think this will be an NCAA tournament team next year is that I have come to realize as the Big East season goes on that we are not as athletic as I thought we were when we were playing cupcakes. Xavier and St. John's are much quicker than us and are better jumpers. I suspect tomorrow that we will see that DePaul is also more athletic than us.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: bilsu on January 19, 2016, 10:05:43 PM
One of the reasons why I do not think this will be an NCAA tournament team next year is that I have come to realize as the Big East season goes on that we are not as athletic as I thought we were when we were playing cupcakes. Xavier and St. John's are much quicker than us and are better jumpers. I suspect tomorrow that we will see that DePaul is also more athletic than us.

Dude, youngest team in the BEast. Give them time to grow.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: bilsu on January 19, 2016, 02:35:37 PM
They are not an NCAA tournament team this year or next year, even if Ellenson comes back

This year, no.  Next year, I would wager yes.

bilsu

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 19, 2016, 11:24:11 PM
Dude, youngest team in the BEast. Give them time to grow.
I think St. John's is actually younger and much more athletic than us. St. John's will be better than us next year. We barely beat them without their shot blocker.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: bilsu on January 20, 2016, 07:26:38 AM
I think St. John's is actually younger and much more athletic than us. St. John's will be better than us next year. We barely beat them without their shot blocker.

Actually they're not. Their two graduate transfers tip the scales in their favor. We are way ahead of st. John's and will be next year. We lost to two top 5 teams. That's no reason to start predicting doom and gloom for next season
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


wadesworld

Quote from: bilsu on January 20, 2016, 07:26:38 AM
I think St. John's is actually younger and much more athletic than us. St. John's will be better than us next year. We barely beat them without their shot blocker.

Xavier needed a technical foul after a bad foul call against St. John's to win their game against St. John's.  Does that mean Xavier's not as good as St. John's?

Logic tends to go out the window around here when Marquette loses a couple in a row (even if it's to 2 top 5 teams).

mubbnation

Quote from: jsglow on January 19, 2016, 02:36:40 PM
Yep.  Revisit in a couple of weeks.  We'll know more.

Agreed. "Is Marquette an NCAA Tournament team?" is a question we can discuss but not yet answer with a good amount of confidence (obviously).

Lennys Tap

Quote from: mubbnation on January 20, 2016, 10:33:30 AM
Agreed. "Is Marquette an NCAA Tournament team?" is a question we can discuss but not yet answer with a good amount of confidence (obviously).

I feel pretty confident. Right now we're the 8th best team in a 10 team conference. So, no. The discussion should be whether we can improve enough by the end of the year to become an NIT team. I hope so.

GooooMarquette

Quote from: MuMark on January 19, 2016, 05:24:23 PM
http://www.si.com/college-basketball/2016/01/19/2016-ncaa-tournament-bubble-watch-acc-sec-pac-12

I don't disagree with their general order...but I'd place MU closer to the GTown/Creighton group than the DePaul/St. John's group.

To the original question:  If the season ended today, we'd be out.  If we continue to do as we have done, we'd be out.  To be in, we would have to surprise more teams.  The good news is that we still have five games left vs Nova, X, Butler and Providence, so the opportunity is there.

MU82

Quote from: wadesworld on January 20, 2016, 08:56:36 AM
Xavier needed a technical foul after a bad foul call against St. John's to win their game against St. John's.  Does that mean Xavier's not as good as St. John's?

Logic tends to go out the window around here when Marquette loses a couple in a row (even if it's to 2 top 5 teams).

Yep yep.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

MerrittsMustache

Hate to be a downer but...No, Marquette is not a Tourney team this season. I really want them to be, but it's highly unlikely that they'll get there.

MU projects to 17-14 (pre-BET) with an RPI of around 130. Even if they're able to steal the 45/55 games against Prov and Creighton, with all other games going as projected, that gets this team to 19-12 (8-10) with an RPI of ~96. Throw in upsets of Nova and at Xavier and RPI still only projects to 71 (21-10, 10-8). Sure, it's not all about RPI and they'd have a pair of "signature wins," but would that even be enough? Not likely.

muwarrior69

Only if we win the BET...and then we would be one and done.

rocky_warrior

Quote from: Lennys Tap on January 20, 2016, 10:50:20 AM
I feel pretty confident. Right now we're the 8th best team in a 10 team conference. So, no. The discussion should be whether we can improve enough by the end of the year to become an NIT team. I hope so.

By that logic, you're describing Butler too.

wadesworld

Quote from: rocky_warrior on January 20, 2016, 12:15:42 PM
By that logic, you're describing Butler too.

Exactly.  That's what I continue to not understand.

The Lens

The highest profile bracket "guru" has us in his Next Four out.  Given that, I think you have to acknowledge we have a chance. 

That being said, I worry most about our Home & Home with Creighton.  The NCAA dreamers are counting on a sweep and I think that will be a tough task. 

The middle is where we need to feast and right now we're 0-2 in the Middle (@GT, SHU). 
The Teal Train has left the station and Lens is day drinking in the bar car.    ---- Dr. Blackheart

History is so valuable if you have the humility to learn from it.    ---- Shaka Smart

MerrittsMustache

Quote from: rocky_warrior on January 20, 2016, 12:15:42 PM
By that logic, you're describing Butler too.

Quote from: wadesworld on January 20, 2016, 12:19:48 PM
Exactly.  That's what I continue to not understand.

You guys are confusing 8th best with 8th place.

How many teams in the Big East can you confidently say that MU is better than? DePaul, St. John's...maybe Creighton?


wadesworld

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on January 20, 2016, 12:25:39 PM
You guys are confusing 8th best with 8th place.

How many teams in the Big East can you confidently say that MU is better than? DePaul, St. John's...maybe Creighton?

How many can you confidently say that Butler is better than?  DePaul, St. John's...maybe Creighton?

rocky_warrior

I'm not even saying we have a good chance to be a Tourney team.  Only...

1) MU's resume is *currently* better than their conference record.
2) There's a chance, and it wouldn't surprise me much either way (make it or not)
3) It all depends if the team develops more consistency in the coming weeks.  Consistent inconsistency won't do it (but that also wouldn't surprise me)

MerrittsMustache

Quote from: wadesworld on January 20, 2016, 12:26:55 PM
How many can you confidently say that Butler is better than?  DePaul, St. John's...maybe Creighton?

You forgot to add Marquette  ;)

MUfan12

Quote from: wadesworld on January 20, 2016, 12:26:55 PM
How many can you confidently say that Butler is better than?

DePaul
St. John's
Marquette
Seton Hall
Creighton

Lennys Tap

#47
Quote from: rocky_warrior on January 20, 2016, 12:15:42 PM
By that logic, you're describing Butler too.

I'm not saying we're the 8th best team because we're currently in 8th place. I'm saying that our entire season's performance says we're better than 2 teams (St Johns and DePaul) and worse than the other 7. Butler is better than us. Only team we might be on a par with (from that group of 7) is Creighton.

brewcity77

I always set making the tournament as my hope for our team. I hate to say it, but I just don't see it this year (and in the eternal optimist). It's not that we aren't good enough, but that this league is really good. We'd need minimum 11 league wins and our losses against Seton Hall and Georgetown will likely come back to bite us. I hope I'm wrong, but just can't see it.

WarriorPride68

Quote from: brewcity77 on January 20, 2016, 12:54:21 PM
I always set making the tournament as my hope for our team. I hate to say it, but I just don't see it this year (and in the eternal optimist). It's not that we aren't good enough, but that this league is really good. We'd need minimum 11 league wins and our losses against Seton Hall and Georgetown will likely come back to bite us. I hope I'm wrong, but just can't see it.

Not even a week ago you said this in the other Tournament thread:

Quote from: brewcity77 on January 14, 2016, 05:34:27 PMWe have to beat DePaul twice and St. John's. We also need to win at home, probably need to get 4 out of Xavier, Providence, Villanova, Creighton, Butler, and Georgetown. That gives us 9 wins.

That would leave us needing to get 2 wins on the road against Seton Hall, Xavier, Creighton, and Butler. And likely need to win our first at MSG to be a lock. I think that's doable

Previous topic - Next topic