collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

NM by Uncle Rico
[Today at 01:57:02 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by ChuckyChip
[Today at 10:03:06 AM]


NICHE BEST COLLEGE RANKINGS 2020-2026 by MU82
[Today at 08:43:27 AM]


Big East 2024 -25 Results by mileskishnish72
[August 25, 2025, 02:43:12 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Benny B

Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

Henry Sugar

Quote from: Jay Bee on January 20, 2015, 11:01:22 AM
What are you getting for eFG% & what is the source? I have found errors in ALL websites/sources without trying to... But in this one I've got the same figured as Kenpom.com.

I currently have 50.8% for offensive eFG% and 47.5% for defensive eFG%. I have the offense as slightly better than Pomeroy (48.6% in conference) and the defense as slightly worse (47% in conference).

The source is a spreadsheet that I created using Kalman Filter calculations. In other words, the spreadsheet takes a factor, creates predictions, and then modifies the factor based on performance vs the prediction.
A warrior is an empowered and compassionate protector of others.

Dawson Rental

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 19, 2015, 09:42:13 AM
Juan. He was a top 200 defender in the nation last season and a top 100 this season.

Thank you!
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Dawson Rental

Quote from: Henry Sugar on January 20, 2015, 10:37:07 AM
My two cents

Defense
1. I don't think the 3 pt% defense will stay this low. We are worst in the conference at allowing opponents to shoot threes. There is going to be a day where an opponent goes Michigan State or Ohio State on us.

2. The 2 pt% defense /is/ sustainable. MU has done a pretty good job with eFG% defense in general.

3. I don't know if the TO% defense is sustainable. Having said that, the team keeps outperforming expectations on TO%. How well will we do on the second run through opponents?

Offense
1. MU hasn't been bad at offensive eFG%. I track us as slightly better than Pomeroy shows, although declining a bit over the past few games.

2. I don't think that the offensive turnover rate is sustainable either. At least, I hope that the team learns to protect the damn ball. Soon. If that gets fixed, then the offense will go up.

In total, MU is still about a 0.500 team. Even if the defense gets worse, the offense should get better. At the end of the day, the most likely view is still somewhere between 14-17 wins.

I think that most of your posts should start with the following note.

"Spoiler Alert: If you do not want to know how the season will play out, do not read on."
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Henry Sugar

Quote from: LittleWade on January 20, 2015, 11:58:58 AM
I think that most of your posts should start with the following note.

"Spoiler Alert: If you do not want to know how the season will play out, do not read on."

I am wrong ALL THE TIME!
A warrior is an empowered and compassionate protector of others.

Dawson Rental

Quote from: 4everwarriors on January 19, 2015, 09:25:05 AM
Shows ya defense is not the key to winnin', hey? Ya still gotta put it in the hole yourself, aina?

What's the saying about offense and defense?  Something about offense can come or go, but if you put in the effort, defense will always be there.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Dawson Rental

Quote from: Henry Sugar on January 20, 2015, 12:00:30 PM
I am wrong ALL THE TIME!

I thought that I was wrong once, but it turned out I was mistaken...
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Jay Bee

Quote from: Henry Sugar on January 20, 2015, 11:41:54 AM
I currently have 50.8% for offensive eFG% and 47.5% for defensive eFG%. I have the offense as slightly better than Pomeroy (48.6% in conference) and the defense as slightly worse (47% in conference).

The source is a spreadsheet that I created using Kalman Filter calculations. In other words, the spreadsheet takes a factor, creates predictions, and then modifies the factor based on performance vs the prediction.

Gotcha, I think. You're calculating an eFG%-related metric that adjusts actual results based on whatever assumptions. Eg, predictive v's actual & so forth..... whereas Kenpom's eFG% is no diff than mine, Jim, Bob, dave's or anyone else's - it's just actual eFG%.
The portal is NOT closed.

MUDPT

I ran a correlation coefficient from last year, using John Gasaway's defensive PPP on January 21, 2014 (http://johngasaway.com/2014/01/21/tuesday-truths-were-back-edition/) and the end of year Pomeroy defensive efficiency numbers.  r value= .415.  Somewhat correlated, but definite variance.

Jay Bee

Quote from: MUDPT on January 20, 2015, 08:55:16 PM
I ran a correlation coefficient from last year, using John Gasaway's defensive PPP on January 21, 2014 (http://johngasaway.com/2014/01/21/tuesday-truths-were-back-edition/) and the end of year Pomeroy defensive efficiency numbers.  r value= .415.  Somewhat correlated, but definite variance.

Uhhh, what?

You looked at actual ppp in January vs. Pomeroys Adj DE (used for predictive purposes) as of year end? How come why?
The portal is NOT closed.

MUDPT

Sorry, used the end of the year Conference DE numbers from Pomeroy.  Not the full season.  Was trying to see if there was correlation between after 5-6 games and end of the season. When I'm not at work later, I can run January 21 versus end of season.

Previous topic - Next topic