Main Menu
collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

NCAA Tournament expansion as early as next season. by brewcity77
[Today at 03:02:43 PM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by Scoop Snoop
[Today at 02:42:57 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by mileskishnish72
[Today at 01:39:45 PM]


NCAA settlement approved - schools now can (and will) directly pay athletes by Jay Bee
[Today at 10:33:57 AM]


NM by MU82
[Today at 10:17:40 AM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by MUDPT
[June 06, 2025, 10:08:35 PM]


2025 Coaching Carousel by Uncle Rico
[June 06, 2025, 04:29:28 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

willie warrior

Quote from: tower912 on January 01, 2014, 09:30:59 AM
I thought the defensive scheme Buzz ran was very effective.   Creighton just made MU pay every time a rotation was less than perfect.   Held a high scoring team to 67.    There aren't miracles sitting on the bench.  He is getting more minutes for Deonte and JJJ.   Dawson isn't ready.    Creighton hit 3's.   MU didn't.   Ballgame. 
No--MU didn't defend the 3--Ballgame.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

79Warrior

Quote from: The Sultan of Syncopation on January 01, 2014, 08:44:42 AM
I have come to the conclusion that we simply don't have the combination of experience and talent in the backcourt to win consistently this year.  It really doesn't matter who starts...that isn't going to change.

+1. Absolutely correct. I think we are going to struggle to win 10 games in conference.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

My question about last night is why was Jamil running the point with Derrick on the floor? If Derrick isn't going to bring the ball up, why is he on the court?
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


forgetful

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 01, 2014, 01:26:47 PM
My question about last night is why was Jamil running the point with Derrick on the floor? If Derrick isn't going to bring the ball up, why is he on the court?

I noticed that too and wondered the same.

chapman

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 01, 2014, 01:26:47 PM
My question about last night is why was Jamil running the point with Derrick on the floor? If Derrick isn't going to bring the ball up, why is he on the court?

Definitely confused by it.  Only thing he does well is rebound...but that wasn't high on our list of needs at the time and you have Juan for that.

willie warrior

Quote from: chapman on January 01, 2014, 01:31:27 PM
Definitely confused by it.  Only thing he does well is rebound...but that wasn't high on our list of needs at the time and you have Juan for that.
Better yet, why was Derrick playing on the block when Jamil was running the point? In Buzz we trust.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

WarriorFan

I think Buzz lost track of who was on the court for a few minutes... Only explanation.
"The meaning of life isn't gnashing our bicuspids over what comes after death but tasting the tiny moments that come before it."

keefe

Quote from: willie warrior on January 01, 2014, 02:39:24 PM
Better yet, why was Derrick playing on the block when Jamil was running the point? In Buzz we trust.

Well, he led the team in rebounds the previous game


Death on call

MU82

Quote from: Goose on January 01, 2014, 08:33:24 AM
Have said it before but I believe it comes down to Buzz being stubborn. Playing guys with limited skills will not get it done. Buzz is a different type of guy and you have to accept both the good and bad side of his style. My only concern is a repeat of our post FF season with TC. Reaching the E8 last year reset the bar of expectations and if we fall too far this season it makes it tougher in the future.

I'm not saying Buzz isn't stubborn, because I don't know if he is or isn't.

But I do know the mentality of coaches, who live and die to win basketball games (or football games or whatever the sport is), so I'm trying to figure out what Buzz's motivation would be to cost his team victories simply because he chooses to be stubborn.

"Oh yeah, I'll show you! We'll play so-and-so and lose, that's what we'll do! Take that!"

That's why the whole we-suck-because-Buzz-is-stubborn argument doesn't make much sense to me.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Gato78

He explained this in the post game. If Derrick is up top, they sag off him. If he goes inside, the defense has to cover him and it opens things up for the other four. Makes sense to me. Also says that Buzz is dealing with what we all see--not oblivious like some of the critics.

Quote from: willie warrior on January 01, 2014, 02:39:24 PM
Better yet, why was Derrick playing on the block when Jamil was running the point? In Buzz we trust.

keefe

Quote from: The Sultan of Syncopation on January 01, 2014, 10:01:40 AM

I have seen nothing whatsoever that indicates that he can play at this level at this time.

Unlike the other guys?


Death on call


raul

MU has better talent than Creighton but it looked like we are not in their league. I cant blame any player  so I blame the coach. Its his job to put out a good team with chemistry. But it seems like the players are playing together for the first time.

79Warrior

Quote from: raul on January 02, 2014, 12:06:05 AM
MU has better talent than Creighton but it looked like we are not in their league. I cant blame any player  so I blame the coach. Its his job to put out a good team with chemistry. But it seems like the players are playing together for the first time.

What do you base the talent statement on? Just curious because Creighton looked pretty decent to me. Always amazes with folks who put down the team that just pasted us.

tower912

Creighton had almost everybody back from a very good team.   MU is replacing its starting backcourt and 90 mpg overall.   
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

MU82

Quote from: raul on January 02, 2014, 12:06:05 AM
MU has better talent than Creighton but it looked like we are not in their league. I cant blame any player  so I blame the coach. Its his job to put out a good team with chemistry. But it seems like the players are playing together for the first time.

This makes Creighton the fifth team we lost to that we supposedly are "better than," following Arizona State, San Diego State, New Mexico and Bucky. (I don't remember anybody claiming we were better than Ohio State, but somebody probably did.)

I call this Patrick Ewing Syndrome, named after the guy who kept claiming his Knicks were better than the Bulls team that beat them time after time.

We are Marquette fans, therefore we our team is better than everybody else.

Because it hurts too much to say we aren't better than Creighton et al.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

We R Final Four

Creighton has a POY candidate and a 3-point shooting team for the ages. 
We are not a good team.
I for one did not think that we were better than Creighton(-9 easy cover)--but I get your point.

bilsu

Quote from: tower912 on January 01, 2014, 09:30:59 AM
I thought the defensive scheme Buzz ran was very effective.   Creighton just made MU pay every time a rotation was less than perfect.   Held a high scoring team to 67.    There aren't miracles sitting on the bench.  He is getting more minutes for Deonte and JJJ.   Dawson isn't ready.    Creighton hit 3's.   MU didn't.   Ballgame. 
I do not see defense as the problem, except for the fact that we no longer get points off of turnovers. I see the insistence on paint touches being part of the problem. We need to take good shots when the shots are available. It should not matter whether we have had a paint touch or not. The lastest insistence by Buzz for a paint touch is only going to hamper this team. Thomas and Anderson need to take the shot if they are open. When they are open under Buzz's direction they are looking to pass instead of shooting. Are Jake and Juan world class shooters? I would say no, but they are good enough that they should feel that they can take an open shot. Too many times a good shot has been passed up and we do not score anyways.

Aughnanure

Quote from: bilsu on January 02, 2014, 09:40:04 AM
I do not see defense as the problem, except for the fact that we no longer get points off of turnovers. I see the insistence on paint touches being part of the problem. We need to take good shots when the shots are available. It should not matter whether we have had a paint touch or not. The lastest insistence by Buzz for a paint touch is only going to hamper this team. Thomas and Anderson need to take the shot if they are open. When they are open under Buzz's direction they are looking to pass instead of shooting. Are Jake and Juan world class shooters? I would say no, but they are good enough that they should feel that they can take an open shot. Too many times a good shot has been passed up and we do not score anyways.

This (though I just have never liked Buzz's double the post strategy which always leaves an open shooter somewhere). We don't have great shooters, but we should have shooters who are good enough to make open jumpers.

But hey, rules like this worked for Hoosiers right?   
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.” - T.E. Lawrence

WellsstreetWanderer

We got pasted by a team whose shooters took open shots and sagged because we do not .
This red light, green light thing ain't working with this squad. Time to come up with something else because Chris and Devante can't perform double teamed all the time

humanlung

In my opinion, this team simply doesn't have the heart of recent MU teams.  It seems like there's a lack of hustle and tenacity and an over-abundance of "attitude" (and you can interpret that word in a number of ways with this group of players).

Perhaps if there were stronger Senior leadership this might not be the case but there isn't anyone on this team who can call out teammates for laziness or too much crying when things don't go well.  Can you see anyone standing up to Jae in the locker room after being called out?  Jimmy B?  Lazar?  Wes/Jerel?

We will be fine.  Next year.  As someone who went to MU for three years of Bob Dukiet, I can tell you that this year could be a hell of a lot worse.  Granted, it's not what we have come to expect under Buzz but, sometimes, crappy seasons happen.  This is one of them.     

wyoMUfan

I totally agree - my initial thoughts at the 1st TV timeout were "without a glue guy a-la DJO,Cadougan,Butler, Crowder, (even Vander)" we don't seem to respond well to gut check moments. Past Buzz teams have been good at responding to deficits, this team not so much.

I'd like to see Jamil fill this role, but I think you can't just inspire with words but action. Cadougan would always make that drive and crazy layup, or DJO would impose his will and stuff one. Jamil's 16 foot jumpers don't exactly rally the troops.

Don't get me started on the disappearing act Davante has decided to pull in recent games. He has the ability to be that war cry when we are down but just doesn't seem to be effective over the recent span.

Quote from: humanlung on January 02, 2014, 11:06:59 AM
In my opinion, this team simply doesn't have the heart of recent MU teams.  It seems like there's a lack of hustle and tenacity and an over-abundance of "attitude" (and you can interpret that word in a number of ways with this group of players).

Perhaps if there were stronger Senior leadership this might not be the case but there isn't anyone on this team who can call out teammates for laziness or too much crying when things don't go well.  Can you see anyone standing up to Jae in the locker room after being called out?  Jimmy B?  Lazar?  Wes/Jerel?

We will be fine.  Next year.  As someone who went to MU for three years of Bob Dukiet, I can tell you that this year could be a hell of a lot worse.  Granted, it's not what we have come to expect under Buzz but, sometimes, crappy seasons happen.  This is one of them.     


4th and State

Quote from: wyoMUfan on January 02, 2014, 11:18:14 AM
I totally agree - my initial thoughts at the 1st TV timeout were "without a glue guy a-la DJO,Cadougan,Butler, Crowder, (even Vander)" we don't seem to respond well to gut check moments. Past Buzz teams have been good at responding to deficits, this team not so much.

I'd like to see Jamil fill this role, but I think you can't just inspire with words but action. Cadougan would always make that drive and crazy layup, or DJO would impose his will and stuff one. Jamil's 16 foot jumpers don't exactly rally the troops.

Don't get me started on the disappearing act Davante has decided to pull in recent games. He has the ability to be that war cry when we are down but just doesn't seem to be effective over the recent span.


Those guys you listed above were studs more than they were glue guys.  That's basically what this team is missing.  A guy when we need to get a basket we go to him.  Non-existent this year.

Les Nessman

For some reason, I see Deonte taking on a leadership role next season. Once he understands defensive positioning and is a little more mature, I think he will become even more confident and aggressive since he won't have to worry about whether he's gonna get burned on the defensive end right after he throws down on someone.

CTWarrior

Quote from: Gato78 on January 01, 2014, 03:39:09 PM
He explained this in the post game. If Derrick is up top, they sag off him. If he goes inside, the defense has to cover him and it opens things up for the other four. Makes sense to me. Also says that Buzz is dealing with what we all see--not oblivious like some of the critics.

I figured that was why he put Derrick there when I watched the game.  But I must admit, it still doesn't make much sense.  Why have him in the game if that is what you are going to do with him?  Sure you have to guard him when he is under the basket.  But you'd have to guard anybody standing there and there are other guys on the team (basically everyone else except Thomas or maybe Dawson) who would be bigger threats to score from the low blocks.  The only explanation I can think of is that Buzz thinks so highly of his defense that he will live with punting one position on offense.
Calvin:  I'm a genius.  But I'm a misunderstood genius. 
Hobbes:  What's misunderstood about you?
Calvin:  Nobody thinks I'm a genius.

Previous topic - Next topic