collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by MuggsyB
[Today at 06:27:04 PM]


Congrats to Royce by MattyWarrior
[Today at 06:19:59 PM]


NM by marqfan22
[Today at 05:53:46 PM]


More conference realignment talk by MU82
[Today at 04:02:10 PM]


Scouting Report: Ian Miletic by MU82
[Today at 04:00:41 PM]


Marquette vs Oklahoma by dgies9156
[Today at 12:25:50 PM]


What is the actual gap between Marquette and the top of the Big East by MU82
[Today at 11:09:52 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

moomoo

6/21/2013 - 2014 C Khadeem Lattin (6-9, 190, 4★) | Overall Rank: 68 | Position Rank: 7 has received an offer from Marquette. - Per Scout
6/21/2013 - 2015 PF Cody Schwartz (6-8, 190, 2★) has received an offer from Marquette. - Per Mark Miller, Wisconsin Basketball Yearbook
6/21/2013 - 2015 SF E'Torrion Wilridge (6-6, 190, 4★) has received an offer from Marquette. - Per Alex Kline, The Recruit Scoop
Silenzio. Parla il moomoo.

BCHoopster

Buzz really must be working hard to offer so many kids, I am sure this is how they got Johnson from Memphis.  It is great to have such a big recruiting budget to be everywhere.  In the
past even TC would try hard on a few kids, he lost out, MU lost out.  Buzz I am sure has priority recruits but those kids are being recruited by the heavy weights.  Somebody is going to
see that there is PT time at the center position.

GGGG

Lattin is interesting.  His game is more like McKay's than Gardner's or Otule's.  He's thin, wirey, full of energy. 

Went off to Spain as a sophomore to play at a basketball academy over there...and apparently will be home schooled this year.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/luke_winn/06/18/Khadeem.Lattin/index.html

willie warrior

Love to Buzz offering some quality 4 start bigs. But we must land one or two.. Keep working hard, Buzz.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

Hards Alumni

personally, I think someone needs to be at least 6'8 (6'9 is more my taste) OR over 220lbs to be considered a 'big'.

6'6 190lbs?  Come on, that has switchable written all over it.

The Equalizer

Quote from: BCHoopster on June 21, 2013, 08:00:00 AM
Buzz really must be working hard to offer so many kids, I am sure this is how they got Johnson from Memphis.  It is great to have such a big recruiting budget to be everywhere.  In the
past even TC would try hard on a few kids, he lost out, MU lost out.  Buzz I am sure has priority recruits but those kids are being recruited by the heavy weights.  Somebody is going to
see that there is PT time at the center position.

The other factor at play yere is that we now have Verbal Commits and the use of Twitter by recruits to document every visit & offer.  That didn't exist five years ago, so we never really knew who really had offers or not.

While it seems like we have a lot more activity I suspect the activity was always there--just not documented anywhere.

martyconlonontherun

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on June 21, 2013, 08:50:10 AM
personally, I think someone needs to be at least 6'8 (6'9 is more my taste) OR over 220lbs to be considered a 'big'.

6'6 190lbs?  Come on, that has switchable written all over it.

Reading fail.



leever

Quote from: Terror Skink on June 21, 2013, 09:29:48 AM
He's 6'9"

Lattin = 6'9"
Wolridge = 6'6"

Depends which "big" he was talking about

GGGG

Quote from: leever on June 21, 2013, 09:32:42 AM
Lattin = 6'9"
Wolridge = 6'6"

Depends which "big" he was talking about

Good point.

Hards Alumni

Quote from: leever on June 21, 2013, 09:32:42 AM
Lattin = 6'9"
Wolridge = 6'6"

Depends which "big" he was talking about

Right, there are 3 players listed.  And they are all skinny.  Does anyone think that the 6'9 kid even plays like a 'big'?  Or are we just calling him a big because he is 6'9?  And from what TS said in his initial post here Lattin plays more like a switchable than a big.  So which is it?

WarriorInNYC

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on June 21, 2013, 09:25:55 AM
How's that?

Pretty sure he meant it was a reading fail as the title of the thread is "Two more bigs get offers"

GGGG

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on June 21, 2013, 09:42:18 AM
Right, there are 3 players listed.  And they are all skinny.  Does anyone think that the 6'9 kid even plays like a 'big'?  Or are we just calling him a big because he is 6'9?  And from what TS said in his initial post here Lattin plays more like a switchable than a big.  So which is it?


I'm not sure what you mean by "plays like a big."  How I described McKay doesn't mean he isn't a big...in fact McKay is probably the starting post player in 14-15.

Silkk the Shaka

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on June 21, 2013, 09:25:55 AM
How's that?

Post title says "Two bigs get offers."  There are three players listed, a C, a PF, and a SF.  I'm guessing the 6'6" SF is not considered on of the two bigs, but I could be way off base here.

Hards Alumni

Quote from: Terror Skink on June 21, 2013, 09:59:25 AM

I'm not sure what you mean by "plays like a big."  How I described McKay doesn't mean he isn't a big...in fact McKay is probably the starting post player in 14-15.

Davante plays like a big, Chris Otule plays like a big.  Jamil Wilson plays like a borderline big, but is more of a switchable player.  IMO, a big will have post moves, not afraid to be physical, work for rebounds. 

I was under the impression that McKay is more of a combo forward with some height.  He seems fairly quick off the dribble, and doesn't seem to play the post much.  But I guess that all I am really going off of is the small number of videos that I have watched of him.

BCHoopster

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on June 21, 2013, 10:56:50 AM
Davante plays like a big, Chris Otule plays like a big.  Jamil Wilson plays like a borderline big, but is more of a switchable player.  IMO, a big will have post moves, not afraid to be physical, work for rebounds. 

I was under the impression that McKay is more of a combo forward with some height.  He seems fairly quick off the dribble, and doesn't seem to play the post much.  But I guess that all I am really going off of is the small number of videos that I have watched of him.

There going nowhere without some type of physical presence in the middle.  McKay is not wide, tall, but not wide.  Steve Taylor would have to play center, not good.  Burton would then
be the small forward as he has some bulk.  Add Johnson or Mayo with the Wilsons.  It would not be a bad team, but I have confidence that they can find 1 power player to start.  Needs
another PF as a sub.

GGGG

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on June 21, 2013, 10:56:50 AM
Davante plays like a big, Chris Otule plays like a big.  Jamil Wilson plays like a borderline big, but is more of a switchable player.  IMO, a big will have post moves, not afraid to be physical, work for rebounds. 

I was under the impression that McKay is more of a combo forward with some height.  He seems fairly quick off the dribble, and doesn't seem to play the post much.  But I guess that all I am really going off of is the small number of videos that I have watched of him.


McKay is a hustle guy.  Going to get a lot of rebounds and get a lot of his points off those rebounds.  I don't think he is much of a shooter.

Jay Bee

I've watched a lot of Lattin for a few years now - have always liked him (even though I LOVE** his Houston Hoops teammate Justise).

There's another topic here re: the "O'Bannon case"... NCAA attorneys actually talked to his grandpa (Texas Western star) and he gave helpful testimony for the NCAA (re: ESPN offering him big bucks to make a TV movie on Tex West'n).

Anyway, Lattin's an impressive shotblocker, always has been. Offense hasn't gotten to where you might want to see it, but I really like watching him play.

With Houston Hoops, he's got Winslow, Oubre and Jackson all on the floor with him.. all those guys with good size as well.. so he doesn't have to do as much.. but, he's a nice looking player. Think he'd fit in quite well at MU.
The portal is NOT closed.

ChitownSpaceForRent

Think hes related to David Lattin in some way?

Jay Bee

Quote from: esard2011 on June 21, 2013, 01:28:57 PM
Think hes related to David Lattin in some way?

Yeah, like I was saying in the post above, David is his grandpa. I've been watching Khadeem for several years now.
The portal is NOT closed.

ChitownSpaceForRent

Quote from: Jay Bee on June 21, 2013, 01:30:16 PM
Yeah, like I was saying in the post above, David is his grandpa. I've been watching Khadeem for several years now.

Whoops, sorry totally missed it.

lab_warrior

Quote from: Jajuannaman on June 21, 2013, 10:17:23 AM
Post title says "Two bigs get offers."  There are three players listed, a C, a PF, and a SF.  I'm guessing the 6'6" SF is not considered on of the two bigs, but I could be way off base here.

Title should read "Two bigs and a medium get offers."

Silkk the Shaka

Quote from: lab_warrior on June 21, 2013, 03:22:07 PM
Title should read "Two bigs and a medium switchable get offers."

Sorry, I've been brainwashed


muwarrior69

Is Khadeem Lattin any relation to Dave Lattin from the 1966 UTEP team?

Previous topic - Next topic