collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Pearson to MU by Markusquette
[Today at 09:13:44 PM]


Kam update by dpucane
[Today at 09:00:06 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by brewcity77
[Today at 08:53:49 PM]


Proposed rule changes( coaching challenges) by romey
[Today at 04:27:00 PM]


OT congrats to MU golf team. by MuMark
[Today at 02:56:55 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by Shaka Shart
[Today at 02:55:03 PM]


Ethan Johnston to Marquette by tower912
[Today at 10:56:48 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

dwaderoy2004

Paint Touches tweeted put Marquette and Rutgers transfer Jerome Seagears have seta visit.  Would be a really nice get.  Have read NCAA may grant all Rutgers transfers waivers for immediate eligibility due to mike rice fiasco. 

Ellenson Guerrero

If we can get him immediately then I'm all for it. Not sure he's worth waiting a year for though.
"What we take for-granted, others pray for..." - Brent Williams 3/30/14

🏀


mufansince72

Rather have the other Rutgers guy

GoldenZebra

Carter or Seagears immediately is a good grab. Even if they dont replace Vanders scoring, they provide another facet of depth to the guard position. I dont think JJJ is gonna be an impact player right out of the gates, but I see him filling a similar role to Todd his freshman year, but scoring a bit more.

Otule's Glass Eye

He's a solid player and former borderline top 100 recruit but do we really need another point guard? We already have 3 (Du. Wilson, De. Wilson, Dawson) and I think Duane will be able to make up for the large majority of Junior's production by himself. Would rather have a 2 or a 3.

GGGG

You just listed two freshmen and a junior who has significant deficiencies.  This is a potential top 10 team...an experience PG would be great.

And Duane could definitely play an off guard position.

Otule's Glass Eye

Quote from: Terror Skink on April 19, 2013, 07:28:06 PM
You just listed two freshmen and a junior who has significant deficiencies.  This is a potential top 10 team...an experience PG would be great.

And Duane could definitely play an off guard position.

Point taken, I'm just really high on Wilson. There's no telling how good he'll be though so an experienced PG would definitely help, I agree.

muguru

Quote from: mufansince72 on April 19, 2013, 07:19:20 PM
Rather have the other Rutgers guy

Yep....would much rather have Eli Carter.
"Being realistic is the most common path to mediocrity." Will Smith

We live in a society that rewards mediocrity , I detest mediocrity - David Goggi

I want this quote to serve as a reminder to the vast majority of scoop posters in regards to the MU BB program.

jeffreyweee

Shot 38% from 3. Would be a solid contributor but no game changer. I'd take it.

avid1010

Quote from: MUFanatic4Life on April 19, 2013, 07:24:34 PM
He's a solid player and former borderline top 100 recruit but do we really need another point guard?

YES!

LastWarrior

Ranked #89 on Scout and #101 coming out of high school  From his scout profile...

STRENGTHS
3-Point Range
Athleticism
Ballhandling
   
AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT
Decision Making
Defensive Presence

A big time athlete who can play either guard spot, Seagears has a lot of potential. He exploded on to the scene late in his high school career, and began showing his ability to score from inside and out. Seagears does need to transition from a scoring combo guard into a true point guard and that means making better decisions with the basketball.

"The Lord is a Warrior" - Exodus 15:3

GoldenZebra

Carter would be better from a pure scorer...but he isnt even looking at MU i thought

Markusquette

#13
Here's a highlight reel from HS.  

http://blip.tv/ballislife/6-1-pg-jerome-seagears-is-a-big-time-sleeper-for-the-rutgers-2011-recruiting-class-senior-mix-5287551

Looks like he has a lot more "flash" to his game than someone like junior.  If he can shoot that would be very helpful.  Agree I'm not totally sure if we need another PG like this but we'll see.  Sorta reminds me of AI.


Dawson Rental

#14
Quote from: Jamil_toMU10 on April 19, 2013, 09:44:57 PM
Here's a highlight reel from HS.  

http://blip.tv/ballislife/6-1-pg-jerome-seagears-is-a-big-time-sleeper-for-the-rutgers-2011-recruiting-class-senior-mix-5287551

Looks like he has a lot more "flash" to his game than someone like junior.  If he can shoot that would be very helpful.  Agree I'm not totally sure if we need another PG like this but we'll see.  Sorta reminds me of AI.


I assume by that you mean a point guard because of height, not game.

Just looked at the mixtape.  A mixtape of a HS PG without a single play where he is creating for someone else.  If Buzz wants him, I'm all for it.  But, let's not miscategorize him as a PG based on his height.  I'd think that DJO isn't a bad comparison.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Markusquette

Quote from: LittleMurs on April 19, 2013, 10:25:52 PM
I assume by that you mean a point guard because of height, not game.

Just looked at the mixtape.  A mixtape of a HS PG without a single play where he is creating for someone else.  If Buzz wants him, I'm all for it.  But, let's not miscategorize him as a PG based on his height.  I'd think that DJO isn't a bad comparison.

Yes, similar height and flash to his game.  Iverson was a shooting guard.  The thing is, AI is/was one of the best to ever play the game. He had the talent to make any great play on the court.  Seagears appears to be a short shooting guard, hence my comparison.

Waryours

Quote from: LastWarrior on April 19, 2013, 09:09:33 PM
Ranked #89 on Scout and #101 coming out of high school  From his scout profile...

So he'd be our 5th highest rated newcomer?  I'd rather give Duane the minutes.  He will make everyone forget the name Dominic James.

buckchuckler

Quote from: Waryours on April 20, 2013, 12:14:38 AM
So he'd be our 5th highest rated newcomer?  I'd rather give Duane the minutes.  He will make everyone forget the name Dominic James.

Be serious.  People can't here forget DJ Newbill. 

brewcity77

Quote from: AWegrzyn17 on April 19, 2013, 06:41:05 PM
If we can get him immediately then I'm all for it. Not sure he's worth waiting a year for though.

This exactly. We could use another point. I'd prefer a senior grad transfer, but if he can play next year I think Seagears would be a very good add.

willie warrior

Another PG? We already have 3, and some on this board have said that J. Wilson can play the point, while others have suggested that Mayo can play Point. Oh I get it, we can play a PG at every position, becuase OX is a PG in a big man's body!
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

bilsu

Most freshmen are inconsistent and the worst position for inconsistency is point guard. I love Derrick for the toughness he brings to the court, but he is not a distributor. I do not have great faith in Mayo being available every game. Thomas is a good teammate and I am glad to have him back on the team. We need an experienced point guard more than anything else on this team.

brewcity77

Quote from: muguru on April 19, 2013, 08:05:07 PM
Yep....would much rather have Eli Carter.

I'd prefer Myles Mack to either of them. Carter is strictly a volume shooter and Seagears isn't really the true point guard we need. But I would take Seagears ahead of Carter as I don't think Carter would look as good in an offense where he couldn't take 12 shots per game.

MUDPT

Quote from: brewcity77 on April 20, 2013, 08:13:34 AM
I'd prefer Myles Mack to either of them. Carter is strictly a volume shooter and Seagears isn't really the true point guard we need. But I would take Seagears ahead of Carter as I don't think Carter would look as good in an offense where he couldn't take 12 shots per game.
Is Mack transferring?  He would be the ideal get, would basically reproduce and improve Vander's numbers from this past year.

nyg

Quote from: MUDPT on April 20, 2013, 08:33:33 AM
Is Mack transferring?  He would be the ideal get, would basically reproduce and improve Vander's numbers from this past year.

http://espn.go.com/new-york/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/9191269/rutgers-scarlet-knights-top-scorer-eli-carter-decides-transfer

No, see attached.  These guys are looking at a bunch of schools.

brewcity77

Quote from: MUDPT on April 20, 2013, 08:33:33 AM
Is Mack transferring?  He would be the ideal get, would basically reproduce and improve Vander's numbers from this past year.

Myles Mack hasn't announced yet but is said to still be making his decision. I think it's worth giving it a couple days in case he decides to explore his options.

Previous topic - Next topic