Futbol Talk

[Hards Alumni]

LOL.

I don't disagree on the politics involved in FIFA (which honestly and frankly precedes either Trump administration), but to pretend the thread would be blissfully untouched otherwise is just silly and detached from what the Superbar has been. It's not like it's the normal posters in this thread have added nuanced discussion about the political implications to other soccer talk.  It's just another tired political snark pile on.  You don't have to tolerate this administration, much less like or support it, to be exhausted by the need to gripe about it, or make the same genre of cracks about it, in every thread.

Yes, politics is inherently part of FIFA.  So when it gets brought up, begging that it shouldn't be talked about is silly crap. 

[panda]

Yes, politics is inherently part of FIFA.  So when it gets brought up, begging that it shouldn't be talked about is silly crap. 

Move along and start your own thread about it.

[Hards Alumni]

Move along and start your own thread about it.

[MU82]

Show me the link where I declined?

OK.

panda, what are you a doctor of?

I sent wades a private message as I do not feel the need to discuss my personal life on this forum.

[panda]

OK.

lol - the that's your smoking gun here? Despite not agreeing with wades much recently, I respect him and trust his judgment hence why I direct messaged him to answer is question. My choice is to not share much of any personal information on this forum.

You on the other hand are an absolute squid who I wouldn't trust with any information hence why I ignored you. That decision is further vindicated with you attempting to mock me in some odd cringeworthy fashion.

[The Sultan]

Yes, politics is inherently part of FIFA.  So when it gets brought up, begging that it shouldn't be talked about is silly crap. 

This is really a cop out. There is zero reason to bring up politics here right now.

[MU82]

lol - the that's your smoking gun here? Despite not agreeing with wades much recently, I respect him and trust his judgment hence why I direct messaged him to answer is question. My choice is to not share much of any personal information on this forum.

You on the other hand are an absolute squid who I wouldn't trust with any information hence why I ignored you. That decision is further vindicated with you attempting to mock me in some odd cringeworthy fashion.

"Smoking gun?" What are you talking about? In a discussion about injuries, you presented yourself as a medical professional, so I asked you a serious and legitimate question about your field of expertise. You chose not to answer it, as was your right. Then, in this thread, you asked for evidence of you choosing not to answer, which I just provided.

If the subject of a discussion is nuclear war and a Scooper presents himself or herself as an expert on nuclear war, I would expect some Scoopers to ask what makes him or her an expert. There's no "smoking gun." Don't be an absolute squid.

[panda]

"Smoking gun?" What are you talking about? In a discussion about injuries, you presented yourself as a medical professional, so I asked you a serious and legitimate question about your field of expertise. You chose not to answer it, as was your right. Then, in this thread, you asked for evidence of you choosing not to answer, which I just provided.

If the subject of a discussion is nuclear war and a Scooper presents himself or herself as an expert on nuclear war, I would expect some Scoopers to ask what makes him or her an expert. There's no "smoking gun." Don't be an absolute squid.

You missed the point yet again.

I'm not being elusive with you for any other reason than for what I stated above. You are a squid. I don't trust you with information personal to me. I private messaged wades because I believe he would be respectful the information I shared with him.

To keep it painfully simple for you - I don't trust you or like you so I don't owe you anything.