collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

Ranking Big East Centers by Its DJOver
[Today at 10:38:17 AM]


Incoming freshmen by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[Today at 10:32:22 AM]


Lakers Going After Hurley by MU82
[Today at 09:59:43 AM]


2024 Mock Drafts by MU82
[Today at 09:41:03 AM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by Uncle Rico
[Today at 08:26:19 AM]


[New to PT] Big East Roster Tracker by Its DJOver
[June 05, 2024, 02:41:31 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: We are ridiculously weak under the hoop  (Read 5769 times)

4everwarriors

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 16021
Re: We are ridiculously weak under the hoop
« Reply #25 on: January 23, 2011, 12:10:18 PM »
Villanova agrees with you


Well then, the obvious answer is are guards aren't very good.
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

mviale

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2321
Re: We are ridiculously weak under the hoop
« Reply #26 on: January 23, 2011, 12:13:10 PM »
If you look at the +/- for Fulce and Otule last night, there are some pretty dramatic differences--and probably not in the direction that people here would assume.

On-court +/-
Otule  +6
Fulce  -16


Off-court:
With Otule on the bench, Notre Dame outscored MU by 11
With Fulce on the bench, MU outscored ND by 11

Roland Rating (combination of the 2):
Otule +17
Fulce -27

Whats amazing is that despite the litany of complaints against Otule, his Roland Rating from last night was the best from any player on either team.  Fulce was the worst of any player on either team.  

I'm not going to say this is decisive proof that Otule is more important than Fulce.  However, I think people have gone overboard on the "Otule Sucks" argument.  He may not be the best center in the Big East, and he's certainly not a stat-stuffer, but he's at least serviceable and didn't hurt the team effort last night.  

  Zinnnnnnnng
You heard it here first. Davante Gardner will be a Beast this year.
http://www.muscoop.com/index.php?topic=27259

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: We are ridiculously weak under the hoop
« Reply #27 on: January 23, 2011, 12:23:46 PM »
If you look at the +/- for Fulce and Otule last night, there are some pretty dramatic differences--and probably not in the direction that people here would assume.

On-court +/-
Otule  +6
Fulce  -16


Off-court:
With Otule on the bench, Notre Dame outscored MU by 11
With Fulce on the bench, MU outscored ND by 11

Roland Rating (combination of the 2):
Otule +17
Fulce -27

Whats amazing is that despite the litany of complaints against Otule, his Roland Rating from last night was the best from any player on either team.  Fulce was the worst of any player on either team.  

I'm not going to say this is decisive proof that Otule is more important than Fulce.  However, I think people have gone overboard on the "Otule Sucks" argument.  He may not be the best center in the Big East, and he's certainly not a stat-stuffer, but he's at least serviceable and didn't hurt the team effort last night.  


Game.  Set.  Match.

Thanks for playing willie.

willie warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9598
Re: We are ridiculously weak under the hoop
« Reply #28 on: January 23, 2011, 12:55:25 PM »
Oh my--so this proves that Otule is a stud?

These numbers are meaningless. the Roland Index--was that Gilbert?
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind.

willie warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9598
Re: We are ridiculously weak under the hoop
« Reply #29 on: January 23, 2011, 12:58:55 PM »
Game.  Set.  Match.

Thanks for playing willie.
By the way--these figures were from yesterday's game comparing Otule and Fulce. Nothing to do with Ox.

And since we are talking figures here:
Otule: Zero Points; Zero Rebounds and 5 fouls
Game, set match and Superbowl victory---Thanks for partcipating Sultan
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind.

ATL MU Warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
Re: We are ridiculously weak under the hoop
« Reply #30 on: January 23, 2011, 01:16:39 PM »
By the way--these figures were from yesterday's game comparing Otule and Fulce. Nothing to do with Ox.And since we are talking figures here:
Otule: Zero Points; Zero Rebounds and 5 fouls
Game, set match and Superbowl victory---Thanks for partcipating Sultan
Uhhh...that's because Ox can't even get in the game.  Nice try though.

tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23895
Re: We are ridiculously weak under the hoop
« Reply #31 on: January 23, 2011, 01:18:45 PM »
And here in a nutshell, we have the essence of fandom.   On one board, we have an experienced poster swearing the problem is that Buzz played too many people in the preseason, needs to settle on a 7 man rotation.   Here, we have another poster of nearly the same vintage swearing the problem is that we never play the 9th man.   Hmmmmm.      We have one poster coming out of hibernation to ask if Cadougan has ever made a contribution, whereas elsewhere we have stats showing that his assist to turnover ratio is among the best in the BEast.    Buzz's problem is that we defend too far from the basket, we don't use enough players, we should press, we don't zone, we play the wrong kind of man-to-man, we use too many players, we aren't big enough, we should go small, Buzz can't develop youth, he should play more youth, we're inexerienced,  Buzz doesn't know how to use timeouts, stop runs, would stop runs if he just played the 9th/10th/11th guys more, ran off Reggie, can't recruit, can recruit, can't coach, can coach offense, can't coach D, needs to hire a Keady type, Jimmy is weak, Jimmy is a standup guy, Buycks is the most improved, Buycks has too much playground......blahbity blahbity blahbity.      We lost a road game to a ranked team we could have beaten.  It sucks.   Let's beat UConn.
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: We are ridiculously weak under the hoop
« Reply #32 on: January 23, 2011, 07:30:42 PM »
Uhhh...that's because Ox can't even get in the game.  Nice try though.


Yeah no kidding.  Ox has shown that the BE season is too fast for him.  His defense has been terrible and I don't even think he has scored.  The idea that he would be better defensively is laughable.

Marquette84

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1905
Re: We are ridiculously weak under the hoop
« Reply #33 on: January 23, 2011, 07:58:17 PM »
And here in a nutshell, we have the essence of fandom.   On one board, we have an experienced poster swearing the problem is that Buzz played too many people in the preseason, needs to settle on a 7 man rotation.   Here, we have another poster of nearly the same vintage swearing the problem is that we never play the 9th man.   Hmmmmm.      We have one poster coming out of hibernation to ask if Cadougan has ever made a contribution, whereas elsewhere we have stats showing that his assist to turnover ratio is among the best in the BEast.    Buzz's problem is that we defend too far from the basket, we don't use enough players, we should press, we don't zone, we play the wrong kind of man-to-man, we use too many players, we aren't big enough, we should go small, Buzz can't develop youth, he should play more youth, we're inexerienced,  Buzz doesn't know how to use timeouts, stop runs, would stop runs if he just played the 9th/10th/11th guys more, ran off Reggie, can't recruit, can recruit, can't coach, can coach offense, can't coach D, needs to hire a Keady type, Jimmy is weak, Jimmy is a standup guy, Buycks is the most improved, Buycks has too much playground......blahbity blahbity blahbity.      We lost a road game to a ranked team we could have beaten.  It sucks.   Let's beat UConn.

Who spiked your coffee today?

This diatribe here.  A complaint in another thread because someone complemented Gasser for a triple-double.  A suggestion in a third that someone go start a "fire Buzz" website because they offered a critical comment . . .

Get a good night's sleep.  The sun will come out tomorrow. . .  ;D


tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23895
Re: We are ridiculously weak under the hoop
« Reply #34 on: January 23, 2011, 08:28:43 PM »
I'm in a better mood than most here.   We lost a road game to a ranked team.  I was sad, but the sun came up today.    I have no agenda.   
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

MU Avenue

  • Registered User
  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 410
This is a site where opinions are shared and debated, no?
« Reply #35 on: January 23, 2011, 08:29:45 PM »
And here in a nutshell, we have the essence of fandom.   On one board, we have an experienced poster swearing the problem is that Buzz played too many people in the preseason, needs to settle on a 7 man rotation.   Here, we have another poster of nearly the same vintage swearing the problem is that we never play the 9th man.   Hmmmmm.      We have one poster coming out of hibernation to ask if Cadougan has ever made a contribution, whereas elsewhere we have stats showing that his assist to turnover ratio is among the best in the BEast.    Buzz's problem is that we defend too far from the basket, we don't use enough players, we should press, we don't zone, we play the wrong kind of man-to-man, we use too many players, we aren't big enough, we should go small, Buzz can't develop youth, he should play more youth, we're inexerienced,  Buzz doesn't know how to use timeouts, stop runs, would stop runs if he just played the 9th/10th/11th guys more, ran off Reggie, can't recruit, can recruit, can't coach, can coach offense, can't coach D, needs to hire a Keady type, Jimmy is weak, Jimmy is a standup guy, Buycks is the most improved, Buycks has too much playground......blahbity blahbity blahbity.      We lost a road game to a ranked team we could have beaten.  It sucks.   Let's beat UConn.

Your point is unclear, at least to me, tower912. You would prefer people post what here if not their thoughts about Marquette basketball?

You dismiss others’ opinions and concerns as “blahbity, blahbity, blahbity” -- a word that I do not think exists, at least in our language.

You would prefer others post what here instead of their thoughts about Marquette basketball?

Jacks DC

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 369
Re: We are ridiculously weak under the hoop
« Reply #36 on: January 23, 2011, 08:38:57 PM »
And here in a nutshell, we have the essence of fandom.   On one board, we have an experienced poster swearing the problem is that Buzz played too many people in the preseason, needs to settle on a 7 man rotation.   Here, we have another poster of nearly the same vintage swearing the problem is that we never play the 9th man.   Hmmmmm.      We have one poster coming out of hibernation to ask if Cadougan has ever made a contribution, whereas elsewhere we have stats showing that his assist to turnover ratio is among the best in the BEast.    Buzz's problem is that we defend too far from the basket, we don't use enough players, we should press, we don't zone, we play the wrong kind of man-to-man, we use too many players, we aren't big enough, we should go small, Buzz can't develop youth, he should play more youth, we're inexerienced,  Buzz doesn't know how to use timeouts, stop runs, would stop runs if he just played the 9th/10th/11th guys more, ran off Reggie, can't recruit, can recruit, can't coach, can coach offense, can't coach D, needs to hire a Keady type, Jimmy is weak, Jimmy is a standup guy, Buycks is the most improved, Buycks has too much playground......blahbity blahbity blahbity.      We lost a road game to a ranked team we could have beaten.  It sucks.   Let's beat UConn.

Agree with all of this.  Sad.

tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23895
Re: We are ridiculously weak under the hoop
« Reply #37 on: January 23, 2011, 08:42:29 PM »
The essence of fandom.   Like Syracuse fans screaming because the Orange aren't going undefeated.   Like NE fans wondering if Brady and Belichik have lost it.   Like getting in Coach Roy's face on his radio show.   It is the beauty and the curse of the internet age.    Everybody has an opinion,  many with diametrically opposed answers to the same question, sure beyond any rational belief they have the answer more than the coach.   So immensely large and yet so small all at the same time.    A year ago, we were 11-8, had lost to DePaul, etc.   Somehow, this is worse?   Why?    Straddling the Majerus and Dukiet years, I know what it is like to fear Fordham coming to town.    Or to have the sweater vests run a coach out, regardless of the official story.   This fanbase disappoints me sometimes.    That is what that diatribe means.  
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

MerrittsMustache

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4676
Re: This is a site where opinions are shared and debated, no?
« Reply #38 on: January 23, 2011, 08:43:09 PM »
Your point is unclear, at least to me, tower912. You would prefer people post what here if not their thoughts about Marquette basketball?

You dismiss others’ opinions and concerns as “blahbity, blahbity, blahbity” -- a word that I do not think exists, at least in our language.

You would prefer others post what here instead of their thoughts about Marquette basketball?

I think he's saying that he would prefer to read rational, coherent thoughts and opinions as opposed to rambling, ignorant overreactions based on small sample sizes. Unfortunately, this board is veering away from the former and more and more towards the latter.

 

feedback