collapse

Recent Posts

Server Upgrade - This is the new server by rocky_warrior
[Today at 06:42:59 PM]


Big East 2024 -25 Results by Uncle Rico
[Today at 06:13:16 PM]


Owens out Monday by TAMU, Knower of Ball
[Today at 03:23:08 PM]


Shaka Preseason Availability by Tyler COLEk
[Today at 03:14:12 PM]


Marquette Picked #3 in Big East Conference Preview by Jay Bee
[Today at 02:04:27 PM]


Get to know Ben Steele by Hidden User
[Today at 12:14:10 PM]


Deleted by TallTitan34
[Today at 09:31:48 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!


Have to think the Packers loved that Philly comeback

Started by ChicosBailBonds, December 19, 2010, 03:23:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ChicosBailBonds


reinko

I have been drinking for a most of the day now, can someone explain, if this was indeed a good thing?  I think it is.

Go pack Go!

4everwarriors

Won't mean much if the Pack soils their trousers tonight.
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: 4everwarriors on December 19, 2010, 03:40:48 PM
Won't mean much if the Pack soils their trousers tonight.

Maybe.  I think the key was to get the Giants that loss and next week if the Packers beat the Giants wouldn't they both be 9-6 (assuming the Pack loses tonight), but would hold the head to head over the Giants?

I don't know all the scenarios, but I would think this win by Philly was a great thing for the Packers if the Packers can beat the Bears and Giants at home.  Having the Lions beat the Bucs was also a big help for Green Bay...I would think.

GGGG

Yeah even if the Packers lose tonight, and beat the Giants next week, they are in the driver's seat for the Wild Card.

They would win head to head over Giants, and would beat Tampa on the tie-breakers.  They would both have the same conference record and the Packers would have the better record v. common opponents.  GB is 2-2 v. Atlanta, SF and Detroit.  Tampa is 1-3.

GOMU1104

Quote from: 4everwarriors on December 19, 2010, 03:40:48 PM
Won't mean much if the Pack soils their trousers tonight.

Tonight's game is pretty meaningless.

They will control their own destiny whether or not they win or lose.

4everwarriors

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on December 19, 2010, 03:43:35 PM
Maybe.  I think the key was to get the Giants that loss and next week if the Packers beat the Giants wouldn't they both be 9-6 (assuming the Pack loses tonight), but would hold the head to head over the Giants?

I don't know all the scenarios, but I would think this win by Philly was a great thing for the Packers if the Packers can beat the Bears and Giants at home.  Having the Lions beat the Bucs was also a big help for Green Bay...I would think.


Yes, but pretty big ifs considering Flynn may be the QB next week as well.
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

reinko

Rodgers flew with the team, which is a good sign, in terms of those who have been concussed.

Josey Wales

Yup, yup, the Giants and Bucs losses were huge.

Now we HAVE to beat the Giants next week. We will see what this team is made of. I'd almost consider resting starters tonight... but no NFL coach would do that.
BEARS STILL SUCK

Hey Vikings, I like what you've done with the basement.

"Lazar Hayward. The L stands for leader, and the W stands for winner, Lazar Hayward is a winner."

4everwarriors

Assuming a loss to the Pats, the Pack still controls its own playoff destiny by beating both the Giants and Bears at home. Yet, without a healthy Rodgers, that's an improbable scenerio.
Delfino has been out for the Bucks with a concussion for probably the past 2+ weeks. Those injuries can be pesty and lingering.
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

jmayer1

Quote from: 4everwarriors on December 19, 2010, 05:17:11 PM
Assuming a loss to the Pats, the Pack still controls its own playoff destiny by beating both the Giants and Bears at home. Yet, without a healthy Rodgers, that's an improbable scenerio.
Delfino has been out for the Bucks with a concussion for probably the past 2+ weeks. Those injuries can be pesty and lingering.

Delfino actually said he started feeling symptoms during the Oct 29th game and hasn't played since Nov. 6 and the Bucks aren't sure when he will return but have said they he will most likely wear some sort of helmet when he does. Corey Koskie suffered one for the Brewers and was never able to play in a regular season game again.  It's scary stuff and what makes it worse for Rodgers is that it is his 2nd one this year.  Studies have shown that  a player who suffers a concussion is 4 to 6 times more likely to get another concussion. Look at Aikman, he was barely able to get hit towards the end of his career without suffering one. The team has already said Rodgers will wear a helmet with more padding when he comes back.  I'm curious as to why all players aren't wearing those if they would minimize the risk.

chren21

I can't see any reason we could not win tonight.  Wierder things have happened in the NFL.  This NE team lost to the Browns, badly.

With that being said the better scenario would have been the Giants win today, and we win out.  No?

Josey Wales

Quote from: chren21 on December 19, 2010, 05:55:52 PM

With that being said the better scenario would have been the Giants win today, and we win out.  No?

No, with the Giants losing we don't have to win out anymore. It gives us more ways to get in.
BEARS STILL SUCK

Hey Vikings, I like what you've done with the basement.

"Lazar Hayward. The L stands for leader, and the W stands for winner, Lazar Hayward is a winner."

Blackhat

mccarhty, you dumbazz.    You're really complaining about special teams when you refuse to fire nepotism Slocum each and every year.

you reap what you sow.

GGGG

Well, the problem wasn't the idea...it was the execution.

Blackhat

squibbing to the 30, with 2:00 left, not the best idea I've heard.

second everything looks good on paper, otherwise you don't do it but coaching is about getting players to execute the fundamentals, punch, shed block, tackle.  contain.   GB special teams have underperformed year after year and McCarthy keeps Slocum and has the nuts to complain about ST.  It's been a known problem for a long time.

GGGG

They have dominated this team. Three plays are the difference. The woodson drop. The kickoff return and the int for a touchdown. It will be a shame that they will likely lose this. 

4everwarriors

They also got suckered into playing too fast on the Pats last TD drive.
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

chren21

#18
Quote from: 4everwarriors on December 19, 2010, 10:10:28 PM
They also got suckered into playing too fast on the Pats last TD drive.

Let's go after Cowher.  I cant handle his playcalling and special teams.  How do you have the running attack working the way it was and when we get the ball back with 9 min we throw three times?

4everwarriors

Fat Mike really sucked up the play calling and time management on the last drive.
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

Blackhat

Honestly, I like McCarthy I think he's a good offensive mind and qb developer.  

I like how he's fixed the penalties this year but his inability to fix special teams is worrisome.

Thompson may need to go, he lays a good foundation but I fear he restricts himself too much in personnel moves to ever take the pack to an elite level.

 I just don't have a good impression of Mark Murphy, so I'm not sure I trust him to replace Thompson with a better option.  So I'm iffy on what needs to be done, if anything, this off season in the front office.

ChicosBailBonds

Wow.  I would take Ted Thompson 24/7 over our GM....unfortunately our GM is our owner and the owner won't fire our GM

Josey Wales

I just don't understand the people who think TT needs to be fired. He has built a contending and deep team without overspending like crazy. Look at all the key injuries we have sustained... who else could remain this competitive. Without all of those injuries (and possibly with) this team is a legit superbowl contender. Would you rather be like the bills/panthers/lions/cardinals/etc right now? TT has done a very good job.
BEARS STILL SUCK

Hey Vikings, I like what you've done with the basement.

"Lazar Hayward. The L stands for leader, and the W stands for winner, Lazar Hayward is a winner."

MUfan12

I've been very critical of TT and MM in the past.

That said, these guys have been really good this year. They're two home wins away from a playoff berth with a decimated team. Ted built a lot of depth without going nuts with spending, and McCarthy has been generally good coaching.

What bothers me is twofold- First, the inability (or unwillingness) to finally cut bait with Slocum. Their special teams are putrid, and have been for a few years. The second is the playcalling in goal line/short yardage situations. The playbook shrinks to about 3 plays in those situations. There's no creativity at all. Either they go right up the middle, or empty the backfield. Barely roll the QB out, and when they do, its always to the right. And they never throw to the TE anymore in those situations.

GOMU1104

People that criticize TT dont really have a clue.  The fact that this team is still in the playoff picture after losing the players it has speaks to how good Thompson is at building a roster.

Same with McCarthy...if you cant see that the guy (and his staff, save for Slocum) have done a really good job this year, then you just dont get football.