collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Poll

Which is conference would you prefer for Marquette

Big East
118 (88.1%)
Midwest Catholic
16 (11.9%)

Total Members Voted: 132

Author Topic: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference  (Read 9919 times)

The Man in Gold

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 539
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #25 on: November 04, 2008, 10:15:39 AM »

Yes, and that is what created the dreaded "play-in game."  The Mountain West got an automatic bid, which forced two low level conference champions to play in a crappy game in Dayton because God forbid the team that finished 7th in the SEC gets booted from their rightful place in the tournament.

Part of the issue with the Mountain West scenario is that under the current NCAA rules there are a set number of at large bids guaranteed, I believe its 32.  By adding the Mountain West they either had to rewrite the rules to lower the at large bids, likely to be opposed by most major conferences, or stick it to the little guys. 
Captain, We need more sweatervests!  TheManInGold has been blinded by the light (off the technicolor sweatervest)

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10036
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #26 on: November 04, 2008, 10:18:59 AM »
I am sure it is. He has no control over what the BE does. I don't see his motive in expressing his opinion that the BE will eventually break up.

I'm not suggesting he has any control over what the Big East does.
I am suggesting that Rick would be hopeful - and reasonably so - for a Big East breakup, and if he can put that bug in someone's ear, why not? Will the Big East as we know it cease to exist because of what Rick Majerus thinks/wants? Obviously not. But to the extent that he has a voice in the college basketball community/media, I don't think he's unaware that his words would be heard. Clearly you believe they must have some merit, given that you've vouched for his likely knowledge of the situation.
I'm not saying Rick is a bad guy for making these comments. But I'm not naive to think he doesn't recognize the self-serving nature of them, either.

oldwarrior81

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1006
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #27 on: November 04, 2008, 10:20:33 AM »
Also remember that Georgetown and Villanova have started up football programs.  Both are playing this season at the D1-AA (or whatever it called) level.

Georgetown in the Patriot against the likes of Colgate and Holy Cross.  Villanova is in the Colonial with James Madison, Delaware, Rhode Island..

THEGYMBAR

  • Guest
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #28 on: November 04, 2008, 10:21:32 AM »
By the time this would happen Rick might have been rumored or accepted four jobs. MU must not even consider sucjh an idiotic move.

Mufflers

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #29 on: November 04, 2008, 12:39:53 PM »
St. Johns (NYC)
Villanova (Philly)
St. Joes (Philly)
DePaul (Chicago)
Georgetown (Washington DC)
Marquette (Milwaukee/Good basketball)
Xavier (Cinci/Good basketball)
SLU (StL)

One or two of Creighton, Providence, Dayton, and Seton Hall based on a formula of market size and state of the basketball programs.

If one, play a 16 game home-and-home schedule.  If two, play a 18 game home-and-home schedule.

Adding one allows flexibility to add a 10th team in the future without too much consideration of scheduling.

A logical four to five teams make the tournament from the conference every year, so the conference is seen as pretty good.  GTown, Nova, MU, and Xavier are perennial contenders for a tourney spot, and Creighton or Dayton could compete to be the fifth tourney team.

It's Comcastic.


dennycrane

  • Registered User
  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 159
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #30 on: November 04, 2008, 12:43:47 PM »
I can not vouch for Majerus. He would have more information than I would. Majerus is not the first to talk about the BE eventually breaking up.

I was more interested in how others would feel about the possible conference Majerus was suggesting than what motives Rick had in talking about it.


Villacats

  • Walk-On
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #31 on: November 04, 2008, 02:41:32 PM »
A few points:

* Auto bids are not an issue. A "split", if it occurs, would actually involve the football schools leaving the Big East. The remaining schools would retain the BE name, and the auto bid. By NCAA rule the football schools, having competed together in the Big East for 5 years, would be entitled to an auto bid for their new conference as well.

* Nova has not "started up" football, it first fielded a team in 1895, and played in Div I until 1980 when the program was briefly discontinued for reasons too extensive to recount here, then restarted in 1985 as Div IAA. Nova making the move back to DI is an option to resolve the football/non-football rift in the Big East, as the football schools are primarily looking for a 9th member and a balanced schedule. Whether to go Div I or not is an issue that has been debated to death among Nova fans for years, and there are many obstacles that would have to be overcome. I don't believe it would even be seriously considered unless the administration's hand is forced by a possible split BE to protect our hoops program. Which brings me to my next point...

* Most Villanova fans want absolutely no part of any "Catholic League". Georgetown fans from my understanding feel the same way. History and rivalries aside, the Big East affords our programs vast advantages in exposure and recruiting, and fills our athletic department's coffers. Like Marquette, Villanova was an independent for many years, and was among the most consistently successful programs in college hoops over that time. But the landscape of college athletics has changed, and we Nova fans believe it would be difficult to near-impossible today to sustain our current success at the mid-major level.

* Personally, I don't think a straight football/non-football split would be the first option anyway. The scenario I worry about is the football schools cherry-picking four basketball schools (Georgetown, Nova, St Johns, ??) and making them an offer they probably couldn't refuse: vote out the remaining four (Seton Hall, Providence, ??, ??) and add another football school. For me as a long-time Nova & Big East fan, that would be a brutal decision for my school to have to make. I feel much more allegiance to Providence and Seton Hall than I do to Rutgers and Cincinnati.

Lastly, I don't think I've posted here before so I'll add that I have a great deal of respect for the MU hoops program and its history, and look forward to many years of great competition.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2008, 02:49:35 PM by Villacats »

jce

  • Guest
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #32 on: November 04, 2008, 04:02:15 PM »
Why thank you for your post Villacats.  Good points all around.

One that you touched on that hadn't really been addressed in the thread is that any Catholic League would be instantly viewed as a mid-major and would have to deal with all of the issues that come along with that.

rocky_warrior

  • Global Moderator
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9140
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #33 on: November 04, 2008, 05:19:30 PM »
* Most Villanova fans want absolutely no part of any "Catholic League". Georgetown fans from my understanding feel the same way. History and rivalries aside, the Big East affords our programs vast advantages in exposure and recruiting, and fills our athletic department's coffers.

Glad you popped in.  I'm sure many Marquette fans agree about the Catholic League (in fact, I'm surprised to see our poll shows 14% support). 

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10036
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #34 on: November 04, 2008, 05:34:58 PM »
Glad you popped in.  I'm sure many Marquette fans agree about the Catholic League (in fact, I'm surprised to see our poll shows 14% support). 

Same here, but peraps I shouldn't be surprised. After all, there was a small faction that believed MU should have rejected the invitation to the Big East and stayed in C-USA. The thinking was somewhere along the lines of "It's better to dominate C-USA and make the tournament every year than risk not making the tournament because of the tough Big East schedule."
I suspect some of those same people may be the ones in favor of a Catholic Conference.

TallTitan34

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9338
  • Gold N. Eagle (Ret.), Two Time SI Cover Model
    • Marquette Overload
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #35 on: November 04, 2008, 05:43:31 PM »
I believe 7 Big East teams are currently ranked in the Top 25.  Nearly half the league.  By far the greatest basketball conference.  While a Catholic League would be awesome it would never produce the quality conference we have now.

IAmMarquette

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 999
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #36 on: November 04, 2008, 07:53:43 PM »
Same here, but peraps I shouldn't be surprised. After all, there was a small faction that believed MU should have rejected the invitation to the Big East and stayed in C-USA. The thinking was somewhere along the lines of "It's better to dominate C-USA and make the tournament every year than risk not making the tournament because of the tough Big East schedule."
I suspect some of those same people may be the ones in favor of a Catholic Conference.

And those people are flat wrong. Especially since we weren't exactly dominant in CUSA. CUSA might get 4 bids. Maybe. The BE will get 7 every year.

DegenerateDish

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2557
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #37 on: November 04, 2008, 08:10:28 PM »
Everyone is missing the biggest point of all. History has a way of repeating itself. You can help thank ACC expansion for MU being in the Big East. If you want the BE to stay the way it currently is, you better root like hell for a zero loss Penn State team to make the BCS title game. If they don't, all hell is going to break loose, guaranteed.

The Big 11 is going to expand to 12 teams. It's not a matter of if, but when. It will be greatly accelerated if a zero loss Penn St. gets shut out of the BCS. The Big 11 has always had it's sights set on Notre Dame, and to a lesser degree Mizzou and Syracuse. Most recently it was looking hard at Rutgers (which has shot itself in the foot with a lousy year). It'll be 10 years since next year since ND rejected the Big 11, they might come knocking at the door again soon.

If ND, Cuse, or Rutgers leaves, you better start warming up to playing Xavier and SLU on a regular basis.

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10036
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #38 on: November 04, 2008, 08:31:47 PM »
It'll be 10 years since next year since ND rejected the Big 11, they might come knocking at the door again soon.

If ND, Cuse, or Rutgers leaves, you better start warming up to playing Xavier and SLU on a regular basis.

Notre Dame just re-upped its football contract with NBC through the 2015 season. So, unless they want to walk away from a guaranteed $9 million a year for the next seven years, they're going nowhere.

Notre Dame has no real incentive to join the Big 10. The football program is raking in huge amounts of money - $101 million in annual revenues - without an affiliation and the loss of control that comes with it. Their other programs are doing fine in the Big East and would have nothing to gain from a move. If anything those sports are better off in the Big East. Why change that? Notre Dame has far more to lose - financially and in terms of control - by joining the Big 10 than they would have to gain.

77ncaachamps

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8457
  • Last of the Warrior Class
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #39 on: November 05, 2008, 12:33:42 AM »
Very impressive!

105 voters!

MUScoop is growing by leaps and bounds!
SS Marquette

Avenue Commons

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #40 on: November 05, 2008, 09:27:05 AM »
Was reading that Majerus expects the Big East to split up. He is hoping to position SLU to join a new conference made up of some of the western most BE schools and some A-10 schools.

Marq
ND
Depaul
Dayton
SLU
Xavier
?????

Why wouldn't such a league be the Catholic schools in the Big East that don't have D-IA football and all Notre Dame sports but football? A more attractive and competitive league would include:

Marquette
DePaul
Notre Dame
Providence
Georgetown
Villanova
St. John's
Seton Hall

Then there might be an addition of Xavier and/or Dayton, but SLU is too far away. Marquette and DePaul are already pushing the limits of what is the "East" in Big East.
We Are Marquette

MR.HAYWARD

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1701
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #41 on: November 05, 2008, 09:58:48 AM »
This is most likely the most shortsighted, dumb, mid-major thinking thread i have ever viewed and reading and responding to it have only made me dumber!! get a clue people!!

Also, anyone that thinks ND is attracted to the big ten is even dumber!!!  ND most likely has more alumni in Philadelpia, not to mention NYC, DC, etc.  than thet have in Bllominton, Champiagn, Estlansing and the big Ten areas combined.  Absolutely would be a retarded move....removed tens of millions of fottball revenue by joining the b10 and then remove the olympic sports from the cities the vast majority of your alumni live in.  so stupid.  will not happen any time soon most likely ever.  and i dont even like ND nor have i watched one of there footbal games in at least 20 years.  yet i know how stupid that idea is.   

DegenerateDish

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2557
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #42 on: November 05, 2008, 11:29:11 AM »
Notre Dame just re-upped its football contract with NBC through the 2015 season. So, unless they want to walk away from a guaranteed $9 million a year for the next seven years, they're going nowhere.

Notre Dame has no real incentive to join the Big 10. The football program is raking in huge amounts of money - $101 million in annual revenues - without an affiliation and the loss of control that comes with it. Their other programs are doing fine in the Big East and would have nothing to gain from a move. If anything those sports are better off in the Big East. Why change that? Notre Dame has far more to lose - financially and in terms of control - by joining the Big 10 than they would have to gain.

I understand all your points, and I never said they should join based on what they would lose/gain. All I'm saying is the Big 11 is going to come knocking on their door again. Whether ND listens (in particular the York family), is up to them.

tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23859
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #43 on: November 05, 2008, 11:32:41 AM »
Mr. Hayward, nobody WANTS to leave the BEast.   However, if in 5 years, the football schools boot the b-ball schools, what would you have MU do?
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

jce

  • Guest
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #44 on: November 05, 2008, 11:50:25 AM »
I understand all your points, and I never said they should join based on what they would lose/gain. All I'm saying is the Big 11 is going to come knocking on their door again. Whether ND listens (in particular the York family), is up to them.


After being rejected once, the Big Ten will most definately not ask ND again.  However if ND wants in, they will let them in.

Right now the numbers do not support the Big Ten adding another team.  (ie, will the increased revenue being divided 12 ways exceed the current revenue divided 11.)  Furthermore I am not convinced that the Big Ten *wants* a championship game a la the SEC and the Big 12.  I think they like ending their season with UM v. tOSU.

But that being said, if they do look to add a team, it won't be a no-marquis value school like Rutgers, Syracuse or Missouri.  It will be a ND...or Nebraska...  Something big and bold like Penn State was.

MR.HAYWARD

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1701
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #45 on: November 05, 2008, 03:28:39 PM »
Mr. Hayward, nobody WANTS to leave the BEast.   However, if in 5 years, the football schools boot the b-ball schools, what would you have MU do?

well the football schools cannot "boot" the BBall schools...they can only choose to leave the BE.  whole different set of circumstances.


Missouri will be the next B10 school if they add one. 

Kramerica

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #46 on: November 05, 2008, 04:53:47 PM »
I've lived in St. Louis for all my life (except for the 4 years I went to Marquette) and I've never heard anything about Mizzou moving to the Big 10.  I'm pretty sure that Mizzou has no desire to move to the Big 10. 

DegenerateDish

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2557
Re: Big East or Midwest Catholic Conference
« Reply #47 on: November 05, 2008, 05:01:02 PM »

After being rejected once, the Big Ten will most definately not ask ND again.  However if ND wants in, they will let them in.

Right now the numbers do not support the Big Ten adding another team.  (ie, will the increased revenue being divided 12 ways exceed the current revenue divided 11.)  Furthermore I am not convinced that the Big Ten *wants* a championship game a la the SEC and the Big 12.  I think they like ending their season with UM v. tOSU.

But that being said, if they do look to add a team, it won't be a no-marquis value school like Rutgers, Syracuse or Missouri.  It will be a ND...or Nebraska...  Something big and bold like Penn State was.

Not sure about your points here. The wheel's are already in motion in the Big 10 offices to consider adding a 12th team and a conference championship game. The Big 10 hung the initial nugget out there by suggesting moving back the conference regular season schedule past Thanksgiving weekend. If a zero loss Penn State team gets left out of the BCS title game, things will only escalate from there.

Rutgers and Syracuse have a TON of value, much more than you think. Syracuse resonates extremely well with ESPN/ABC and always will (look at where almost half of ESPN employees graduate from and you'll understand). If Rutgers could have strung together another good quality football season, the Big 10 and ACC would be fighting over them. Look at a map and see where Rutgers is located. You'll see why they have huge value.