collapse

Resources

25-26 SOTG Tally

2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross6
James Jr4
Parham1
Stevens1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Colton Crowdis committed. by MU82
[Today at 01:11:33 AM]


Sad news - Barb Kellaher has stage 4 cancer by MarquetteMike1977
[June 01, 2026, 11:49:23 PM]


‘26-27 Schedule by Scoop Snoop
[June 01, 2026, 10:05:39 PM]


2026 Transfer Portal by Pakuni
[June 01, 2026, 09:57:58 PM]


Fru to Mu by JakeBarnes
[June 01, 2026, 09:34:52 PM]


Mike Broeker named to the NCAA’s Men’s Basketball Oversight Committee by MarquetteMike1977
[June 01, 2026, 09:45:16 AM]


[Paint Touches] Inside look at Marquette’s transfer portal strategy by panda
[May 31, 2026, 08:35:51 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  NA

Marquette
87
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 2026
TV: NA
Schedule for 2025-26
Xavier
89

CrackedSidewalksSays

Commentary:  2009 BE Schedule is favorable to MU

Written by: noreply@blogger.com (Marquette 84)

Now that the Big East schedule is out, there has been a flurry of commentary about how brutal MU's schedule will be. There is a certain amount of truth to that--EVERY team in the Big East plays a brutal schedule.  The more relevant question is whether the schedule provides any advantage or disadvantage in getting to the 12 to13 wins that will likely be necessary to secure a top four finish and two-round bye in the newly revamped Big East Tournament.

In this light, I believe MU has a very favorable schedule.

The conventional wisdom is that you want your tough games at home--thus, when three of four toughest games--Pitt, UL and ND--are scheduled on the road, it leads to concern about the schedule being too difficult.  However, if Pitt, ND and UL are truly top 10 teams, then they would be a tough win even if we played the games at home.  
The ideal schedule would put both the easiest and most difficult games on the road, and the most competitive games at home.  The logic is that you're more likely to lose some of the tough games anyway and win the easy ones anyway regardless of venue.  Home court advantage is wasted on the easiest and most difficult games.  Where the home court advantage comes into plays is with the toss-ups.
  • Top Quartile:  @UL, @Pitt, @ND, UConn
  • 2nd Quartile (MU in this group):  Syracuse, WVU, Georgetown @Georgetown
  • 3rd Quartile:  VU, @VU, UC, SHU, @Rutgers
  • Bottom Quartile:  Depaul, @Depaul, @USF, @PC, St. Johns.
Now, no road game is a gimme--but I like our chances of winning at Providence and Rutgers a whole lot more than  games at Syracuse and WVU.  
I think this is a decent schedule--8 of 9 home games are winnable given our home court advantage--most of our home games are against teams that are equal or below our level.  On the road, if we can take care of business against PC, Depaul, Rutgers and USF, take one of the other two mirror games, and steal one from ND/Pitt/UL, we'll be at 13 wins, which should put us in the hunt for a double-bye in the BET.
 

http://www.crackedsidewalks.com/2008/07/commentary-2009-be-schedule-is.html

Previous topic - Next topic