collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by MuMark
[Today at 11:17:02 AM]


OT MU adds swimming program by marqfan22
[Today at 10:56:11 AM]


Ethan Johnston to Marquette by Zog from Margo
[Today at 09:43:17 AM]


Pope Leo XIV by tower912
[May 08, 2025, 09:06:36 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by Galway Eagle
[May 08, 2025, 01:47:03 PM]


NIL Money by MU82
[May 08, 2025, 08:54:49 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Dr. Blackheart

Question for the board: During time outs in the game English was looking at replays on his iPad, like in the NFL. Is this even allowed on the sidelines in the NCAA basketball? I have never seen this in college hoops.

Dr. Blackheart

Quote from: Dr. Blackheart on December 19, 2023, 11:02:18 PM
Question for the board: During time outs in the game English was looking at replays on his iPad, like in the NFL. Is this even allowed on the sidelines in the NCAA basketball? I have never seen this in college hoops.

Answered my own question. Now allowed.
https://ncaaorg.s3.amazonaws.com/championships/sports/basketball/rules/men/2023-24PRMBB_RulesChanges.pdf

Hards Alumni

Quote from: ChitownSpaceForRent on December 19, 2023, 10:31:32 PM
Here's where my problem is and it'sa problem with the rule itself.

They shouldn't get 4 free throws if the flagrant happens earlier in the play. If you think there's a flagrant, blow it dead and review it. They got an extra possession because of the ineptitude of the crew.

Correct.  Either was a foul and they check to see it was flagrant or it was nothing.  It's ridiculous to go back and look at something that was or wasn't a foul from 30 seconds ago and have TWO fouls called on the same play. 

Dr. Blackheart

Quote from: Hards Alumni on December 20, 2023, 08:06:14 AM
Correct.  Either was a foul and they check to see it was flagrant or it was nothing.  It's ridiculous to go back and look at something that was or wasn't a foul from 30 seconds ago and have TWO fouls called on the same play.

Breeding also ejected Theo John on the play for old time sake.

The Sultan

It is ridiculous, especially since Chase didn't foul anyone, but the process was correctly applied.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

Shooter McGavin

Quote from: El Guerrero 2 on December 19, 2023, 10:36:12 PM
This is really on Shaka. Guys should have been prepared not to get a whistle all night. They let the refs affect them and didn't make adjustments.

Not sure it's on Shaka.  He probably emphasized this in practice and before the game.  People have short memories and the players needed to experience this again for it to sink in.  Hopefully it has sunk in for the rest of the season. 

Dr. Blackheart

Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on December 20, 2023, 08:21:54 AM
It is ridiculous, especially since Chase didn't foul anyone, but the process was correctly applied.

It was but the process needs to be cleaned up. Either they get the four free throws or the extra possession in the post-play review. The Ross foul was the extra possession in reality.

Hards Alumni

Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on December 20, 2023, 08:21:54 AM
It is ridiculous, especially since Chase didn't foul anyone, but the process was correctly applied.

The process shouldn't exist.

MUDPT

Anyone know why Hopkins got 3 free throws on a shot that was clearly after the shot clock had gone off?  Did they rule it in process like continuation? Otherwise, it should have been a common non-shooting foul and 2 shots.

The Sultan

Quote from: Dr. Blackheart on December 20, 2023, 08:30:03 AM
It was but the process needs to be cleaned up. Either they get the four free throws or the extra possession in the post-play review. The Ross foul was the extra possession in reality.

Quote from: Hards Alumni on December 20, 2023, 08:30:23 AM
The process shouldn't exist.

The alternatives are to go back in time to when the incident occurred and erase everything that happened after, or have no replay reviews of potential flagrants that aren't initially whistled. I can see either one of these having just as many problems as what occurred last night.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

Hards Alumni

Quote from: MUDPT on December 20, 2023, 08:33:54 AM
Anyone know why Hopkins got 3 free throws on a shot that was clearly after the shot clock had gone off?  Did they rule it in process like continuation? Otherwise, it should have been a common non-shooting foul and 2 shots.

Did you watch the rest of the game?

Hards Alumni

Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on December 20, 2023, 08:34:28 AM
The alternatives are to go back in time to when the incident occurred and erase everything that happened after, or have no replay reviews of potential flagrants that aren't initially whistled. I can see either one of these having just as many problems as what occurred last night.

I'm on the no replay of flagrant fouls.  If the foul wasn't caught in real time it shouldn't exist. 

Or if we are going to play review police then we should just review every questionable call... like the one Chase was called for.  Bring out the red flags!  Applying it for one situation and not the other is dumb.  But review at all in basketball is dumb... except maaaaaaybe on a goal tend.

The Sultan

Or don't hit someone in the face.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

CountryRoads


Dr. Blackheart

Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on December 20, 2023, 08:34:28 AM
The alternatives are to go back in time to when the incident occurred and erase everything that happened after, or have no replay reviews of potential flagrants that aren't initially whistled. I can see either one of these having just as many problems as what occurred last night.
A rule that awards an extra possession due to officials not seeing a foul live is just silly (versus if they actually did their job and called the flagrant live). It should be an "either or" situation if you are going to allow a review after continued play. Why do you reward a team an extra possession for referee incompetence?

Hards Alumni

Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on December 20, 2023, 08:41:13 AM
Or don't hit someone in the face.

Sounds easy but when players are coached to box out or be physical, it can be pretty hard if you're not looking right at the guy.

The rule should be revised for intent or overt action.  Play on basketball should still exist.

An F1 is like porn, you know it when you see it.  Incidental contact to the head or neck in the normal playing of basketball shouldn't alter the game the way it has been.

MUfan12

Quote from: Hards Alumni on December 20, 2023, 08:58:25 AM
Sounds easy but when players are coached to box out or be physical, it can be pretty hard if you're not looking right at the guy.

The rule should be revised for intent or overt action.  Play on basketball should still exist.

An F1 is like porn, you know it when you see it.  Incidental contact to the head or neck in the normal playing of basketball shouldn't alter the game the way it has been.

Another problem is they look at this in slow motion. Everything looks worse.

If they need to consult a monitor to make a flagrant call it should be in real-time.

The Sultan

Cmon now. It was clearly an F1.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

MUfan12

Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on December 20, 2023, 09:03:24 AM
Cmon now. It was clearly an F1.

The call on Oso last night, no doubt.

I'm saying in general, there needs to be room for guys to make basketball plays, even if it results in contact above the neck. A big on little matchup can easily lead to contact above the neck of the smaller player, but it's a legal basketball play. Right now they're not really allowing for that. Frankly I'm surprised they didn't hit Chase with one when he popped Carter after getting pushed.

Hards Alumni

Quote from: MUfan12 on December 20, 2023, 09:08:10 AM
The call on Oso last night, no doubt.

I'm saying in general, there needs to be room for guys to make basketball plays, even if it results in contact above the neck. A big on little matchup can easily lead to contact above the neck of the smaller player, but it's a legal basketball play. Right now they're not really allowing for that. Frankly I'm surprised they didn't hit Chase with one when he popped Carter after getting pushed.

Yep, agree on all counts.  A smaller defender should look to position his head near where he expects the larger ball handler's hands or elbows to go.

But you know, ethics and all that...

Skatastrophy

Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on December 20, 2023, 09:03:24 AM
Cmon now. It was clearly an F1.

Yep

The refs did a bad job last night and thankfully nobody besides Ross got injured, and that was just a misplaced foot.

cheebs09

Quote from: MUDPT on December 20, 2023, 08:33:54 AM
Anyone know why Hopkins got 3 free throws on a shot that was clearly after the shot clock had gone off?  Did they rule it in process like continuation? Otherwise, it should have been a common non-shooting foul and 2 shots.

I believe because the foul happened before the shot clock went off. I think Kam got his elbow right before it went to 0.

rocky_warrior

Quote from: cheebs09 on December 20, 2023, 11:10:30 AM
I believe because the foul happened before the shot clock went off. I think Kam got his elbow right before it went to 0.

That, plus there were no tenths on the shot clock, and re-watching the ball was (just) out of his hand when the buzzer sounded.

TallTitan34

#48
Breeding back at it in the Creighton / Nova game last night.

https://x.com/cbbonfox/status/1737685204955734078?s=46&t=jxqs74xjrj0YOEifH9UtCw

rocky_warrior

Quote from: TallTitan34 on December 21, 2023, 05:54:59 AM
Breeding back at it in the Creighton / Nova game last night.

https://x.com/cbbonfox/status/1737685204955734078?s=46&t=jxqs74xjrj0YOEifH9UtCw

Would have lost it if I were Neptune.  Clearly a shot clock violation.  At least Nova got the win.

Previous topic - Next topic