collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: finishing  (Read 8297 times)

SaveOD238

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1505
Re: finishing
« Reply #50 on: February 09, 2017, 11:40:04 AM »
So my conclusion is our best path to the NCAA tournament is to have three hot shooting nights in the Big East Tournament.

That's an asinine assertion.  Winning three in a row in MSG to win the Big East tournament (which likely means going through Villanova and probably Butler again) is in no way easier than winning 4 of 6 against teams that have either a) a key starter injured or b) a worse record than us. 

The only way that makes any sense is because 3 is less than 4.  But here's the thing: 3 out of 3 (100 %) is a lot tougher than 4 out of 6 (66%).

In addition, 3 games in 3 days does not favor Marquette at all.  What I have seen year after year in MSG is that the hot shooting teams aren't hot on day 3.  Legs are tired, shots are short, and the team loses.  It happened to Nova (a drive-and-kick jump-shooting team) against Seton Hall (a bang inside team) just last year.  After Day 1 we will be playing with house money.

Herman Cain

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12921
  • 9-9-9
Re: finishing
« Reply #51 on: February 09, 2017, 11:42:28 AM »
That's an asinine assertion.  Winning three in a row in MSG to win the Big East tournament (which likely means going through Villanova and probably Butler again) is in no way easier than winning 4 of 6 against teams that have either a) a key starter injured or b) a worse record than us. 

The only way that makes any sense is because 3 is less than 4.  But here's the thing: 3 out of 3 (100 %) is a lot tougher than 4 out of 6 (66%).

In addition, 3 games in 3 days does not favor Marquette at all.  What I have seen year after year in MSG is that the hot shooting teams aren't hot on day 3.  Legs are tired, shots are short, and the team loses.  It happened to Nova (a drive-and-kick jump-shooting team) against Seton Hall (a bang inside team) just last year.  After Day 1 we will be playing with house money.
A good point.
The only mystery in life is why the Kamikaze Pilots wore helmets...
            ---Al McGuire

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22204
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: finishing
« Reply #52 on: February 09, 2017, 12:48:32 PM »
Six games against tough teams. Even without the injured players Xavier and Creighton are still strong teams. Georgetown has been better lately. We have demonstrated our ability to lose against Providence and St. Johns. d. 

 We need to win Four to get into the tournament. Steve Lavin was commenting on the 6 loss teams in the Big East last night on one of the FS1 games,he says it will take 10-8 to get in.

 It is possible we can win all six of the remaining games. it is also possible we can lose all 6. If we go 3-3 that makes us 9-9.

So my conclusion is our best path to the NCAA tournament is to have three hot shooting nights in the Big East Tournament. I would of course prefer we get in with a 10-8 conference record.

If we do go 9-9 then we don't need to win the BET.
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


GoldenDieners32

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2062
Re: finishing
« Reply #53 on: February 09, 2017, 01:39:58 PM »
If we do go 9-9 then we don't need to win the BET.
True the bubble is so soft this year, like everyone has said