collapse

Resources

Stud of Purdue Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by JTJ3
[Today at 11:13:35 AM]


2026 Transfer Portal Wishlist by Markusquette
[Today at 11:07:20 AM]


Marquette vs Georgetown by Johnny B
[Today at 11:05:25 AM]


A loser's tax for Shaka? by Pakuni
[Today at 11:04:25 AM]


Next Years Starters by MU82
[Today at 10:50:52 AM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by rocky_warrior
[Today at 09:10:06 AM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Skatastrophy
[Today at 09:07:58 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Georgetown

Marquette
59
Marquette vs
Georgetown
Date/Time: Dec 17, 2025, 7:30pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Purdue
79

Windyplayer

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/rankings

Nova does us proud at #12 in both polls. But, that's it in the Big East. Need to do better as the season gets underway.

HOWEVER, Longhorns check in at #10 so Barnes seems to have that program...er, wait, we're not playing that game anymore?

Tugg Speedman

Big East
Nova = 12 and Georgetown among "other receiving votes."

Pac-12
Zona = 3 and Stanford and UCLA among "other receiving votes."


So why don't we ever read stories and the future of Pac-12 basketball?  Why is it on the BE that seems to be "on the brink" and the BE has to "explain itself."

The Pac-12 has been as bad as any power 5 conference ... three years ago the Pac-12 had no ranked teams and only UCLA among others getting votes (http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/rankings/_/year/2012/week/4/seasontype/3

The Pac-12 has been a mid-major basketball conference for years ... certainly the A10 has been better than them year in and year out for years.




NCMUFan

Have a decent winning streak and beat some decent teams and you will be ranked.  No one in the Big East has proved that they deserve to be ranked yet.

wadesworld

Quote from: NCMUFan on November 01, 2014, 03:33:14 PM
Have a decent winning streak and beat some decent teams and you will be ranked.  No one in the Big East has proved that they deserve to be ranked yet.

Well, everyone's 0-0 so...

MU82

Quote from: Windyplayer on November 01, 2014, 01:23:47 PM
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/rankings

Longhorns check in at #10 so Barnes seems to have that program...er, wait, we're not playing that game anymore?


I couldn't help but notice the same thing and recall how much energy was wasted around these parts conjecturizin' that Buzz would be bugging out of Cheeseland for Beefland. Pretty amusing in retrospect.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: MU82 on November 01, 2014, 03:58:01 PM
I couldn't help but notice the same thing and recall how much energy was wasted around these parts conjecturizin' that Buzz would be bugging out of Cheeseland for Beefland. Pretty amusing in retrospect.

Well, that's where the #2 coach in MU history would go.  I mean, he would never go to a place like.....

g0lden3agle

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on November 03, 2014, 08:46:07 AM
Well, that's where the #2 coach in MU history would go.  I mean, he would never go to a place like.....

Chicos - How would you rank MU's coaches?

Eldon

Quote from: Heisenberg on November 01, 2014, 03:29:53 PM
Big East
Nova = 12 and Georgetown among "other receiving votes."

Pac-12
Zona = 3 and Stanford and UCLA among "other receiving votes."


So why don't we ever read stories and the future of Pac-12 basketball?  Why is it on the BE that seems to be "on the brink" and the BE has to "explain itself."

The Pac-12 has been as bad as any power 5 conference ... three years ago the Pac-12 had no ranked teams and only UCLA among others getting votes (http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/rankings/_/year/2012/week/4/seasontype/3

The Pac-12 has been a mid-major basketball conference for years ... certainly the A10 has been better than them year in and year out for years.





Here's an off-the-cuff explanation.  It may be because of their football dollars, coupled with being largely the flagship institutions in their respective states.  These facts manifest themselves in a lack of questioning of the basketball stability of the conference because if at some point basketball in the PAC12 became so bad, these institutions could flip a switch, as it were, and become respectable at bb.  Of course, any potential increase in basketball allocation comes at the expense of football. 

Concisely put, football can act as basketball-mediocrity insurance whereas the A10 does not have this luxury.

Previous topic - Next topic