collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2025-26 Schedule by Galway Eagle
[Today at 09:33:22 AM]


NCAA settlement approved - schools now can (and will) directly pay athletes by Uncle Rico
[Today at 05:58:53 AM]


Marquette NBA Thread by brewcity77
[July 06, 2025, 09:37:04 PM]


Stars of Tomorrow Show featured Adrian Stevens by tower912
[July 06, 2025, 08:50:48 PM]


25 YEARS OF THE AP TOP 25 by Galway Eagle
[July 06, 2025, 01:43:39 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by DoctorV
[July 05, 2025, 01:45:54 PM]


More conference realignment talk by DFW HOYA
[July 03, 2025, 07:58:45 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

dgies9156

Quote from: muwarrior69 on May 19, 2014, 04:14:36 PM
If the St. Louis Cardinals don't win the World Series, then the best team in baseball did not win the championship.[/color]

There, the statement is now fixed and teal removed!

Lennys Tap

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on May 20, 2014, 11:44:34 PM
Lenny, I apologize. I didn't mean for it to come off as an attack. Rereading, it does sound a bit harsh.

I get frustrated when posters automatically jump onto one side of an argument or another simply because of who is saying it. It is well documented that I don't see eye to eye with several posters, chicos being one of them, but I try to treat each thread as a new discussion. I try to let disagreement on one topic change my perception in another.

I think it is fair to say that it is well known that you and Mr. Bailbonds don't get along. When you started a thread entitled "The Real Crapshoot," a direct reference to something CBB is known for saying, and also equated it to "telling a lie enough..." I perceived it as an attempt to attack one poster. But that is an assumption on my part, I apologize as it was not the case.

This of course begs the question of, "why do I care?" Meh, I've always been bad about putting my nose where it doesn't belong.

As for my understanding of the subject, I understand it quite well. I just don't agree with your analysis.

No worries, TAMU. Certainly true that Chico and I have our fair share of disagreements over the years. I know he regularly attributes statements to me that I haven't made, and his "interpretations" of what I have said are often grossly and, it seems to me, intentionally, misleading. I plead guilty (as Sultan pointed out) to trolling Chico in this case. IMO I was bringing up new evidence that debunked an assertion made countless times by Chico on this board. Crapshoot = random. The biggest crapshoot in sports will produce the most random results. If it doesn't, it isn't. How many rounds, one and done, etc. are factors that can help determine randomness, but they're not as important as having teams that (for whatever reason - low scores, one hot player dominating, etc.) are more evenly matched. This year's NHL playoffs made that clear.

muwarrior69

Quote from: muwarrior69 on May 19, 2014, 04:14:36 PM
If the St. Louis Cardinals don't win the World Series, then the best team in the National League did not win the championship.
Quote from: dgies9156 on May 21, 2014, 07:51:56 AM
There, the statement is now fixed and teal removed!

Your "fixed"  statement has been corrected for historical accuracy.

muwarrior69

#53
nm

Previous topic - Next topic