collapse

Resources

Stud of Georgetown Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

How many guys stay? by Vander Blue Man Group
[Today at 01:03:32 PM]


Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by Spaniel with a Short Tail
[Today at 01:02:30 PM]


A question for the Scoop elders by WhiteTrash
[Today at 01:01:46 PM]


Ross Not Start? by Spaniel with a Short Tail
[Today at 12:50:16 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 12:39:46 PM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by Jay Bee
[Today at 11:30:20 AM]


MU/Creighton Game Thread by Jockey
[Today at 10:49:03 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

CrackedSidewalksSays

How valuable is Jerel McNeal?

Anybody up for some legit statistical analysis of Jerel McNeal's productivity and value to Marquette?  The guys over at Villanova by the Numbers posted an exceptional evaluation of the talented Mr. McNeal earlier this week.

As any MU fan knows, McNeal is a box score stuffer extraordinaire - - which is generally good (steals, rebounds, points) and sometimes bad (turnovers, low shooting percentage, and propensity to take too many shots at the expense of more efficient teammeates like Fitzgerald and Cubillan).  Their analysis, using fairly standard metrics employed by Pomeroy and others, suggests that McNeal is a drag on offense and a boon on defense for the Golden Eagles.  Turnovers and poor shot selection played a role in the offensive liability, but McNeal's sublime defense more than makes up for any marginal shortcomings on offense.  Still, the analysis points out that if McNeal can improve his offensive efficiency (ie, hit a higher % of shots by taking better shots), MU could see a spike in overall offensive production.

Their analysis is purely a statistical exercise however, and fails to account for McNeal's 'presence' on the court (the guys over at FireJoeMorgan  just threw up in their mouths).  By 'presence' I don't mean to imply that MU benefits just from McNeal showing up -- but his ability to break down a defense off the dribble does in fact allow MU to have a more dynamic, wide-open attack.

While McNeal's absence late in the season plots out as a net gain in offensive efficiency for MU -- anybody who saw the St Johns or Michigan State games knows that MU was crippled in those games, unable to break down defenses or create easy shot opportunities as a result of defensive pressure.  I'd argue that the spike in offensive efficiency in those final games had more to do with higher percentage shooters like Cubillan, Fitzgerald and Matthews taking more shots in McNeal's absence -- more than MU suddenly becoming a better offensive team (they were not ...... unless you are a fan of the Mike Deane weave, that is)Read their analysis here.

http://www.crackedsidewalks.com/2007/08/how-valuable-is-jerel-mcneal.html

Previous topic - Next topic