collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by Viper
[Today at 04:14:04 PM]


The Altercation by panda
[Today at 03:55:34 PM]


How Shaka Can Save This Season by 21Jumpstreet
[Today at 03:18:47 PM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by WhiteTrash
[Today at 02:28:37 PM]


NM by MU82
[Today at 01:01:04 PM]


[Paint Touches] Marquette Minutes Projections for 2026 by Jay Bee
[Today at 09:25:42 AM]


2026 Transfer Portal Wishlist by GoldenEagles03
[Today at 01:19:26 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

klyrish

Quote from: Homebrew101 on March 01, 2012, 11:58:05 AMThe Badgers are probably one of Bo's worse teams this year but are still ranked, folks talk about the Big 10 being such a strong conference but other than MI State none of those teams really look to intimidating this year compared to previous years.
The only thing intimidating about WI (and the Big Ten in general) is that watching their games could literally bore one to death.

PVMagic

Quote from: windyplayer on March 01, 2012, 12:18:36 PM
How can you say that? We've earned that top 10 ranking without Garner in the line-up.

Well, I said yes.  I think we are borderline top 10 (7-15 range) without him.  But we are more versatile with him and as last night proved more vulnerable without.  As an example, I don't think a healthy Gardner wins the game for us last night, but I think his presence down low changes the way UC has to play us, and wouldn't allow Jackson to leap all over swatting shots.

MerrittsMustache

Quote from: Warriors10 on March 01, 2012, 10:54:36 AM
We win last night this isn't even a thread...

Interesting how it goes from "Could MU be a 1-seed?" to "Is MU a top 10 team?" in a matter of hours.

Coleman

#28

I think this team is reverting to the mean...by that I mean I think they are in all reality a #12-15 ranked team (3 or 4 seed), with the possibility of swinging to the high single digits and high teens depending on the date of their most recent loss.

This is us coming back towards the center. I don't expect the pendulum swing to go too much farther though.

JD

I
Quote from: Victor McCormick on March 01, 2012, 12:22:50 PM
I think this team is reverting to the mean...by that I mean I think they are in all reality a #12-15 ranked team (3 or 4 seed), with the possibility of swinging to the high single digits and high teens depending on the date of their most recent loss.

+1

I agree, I think MU is an 8-15 ranked team in reality, which i would take any year!  The warriors lost last night, we just need to regroup and roll through march.  No biggie.
“I think everyone should go to college and get a degree and then spend six months as a bartender and six months as a cabdriver. Then they would really be educated.”

AL

bilsu

When Crowder and DJO are shooting well and the other players are playing hard we are a top 10 team. When Ctowwder and DJO are not playing well or the effort is not there from everybody we are not even a top 25 team. This team cannot just show up and beat a ranked team.

Previous topic - Next topic