Otule considering options

[only a warrior]

I did not recall the attacks on Dr. Dunkenstein, so I went to go look at his body of work.  All fifteen posts.  He had two posts on the subject of Otule.  There was one very aggressive response in that thread from someone that has one post, but I cannot conclude it was a direct response to Dunkenstein (post hoc fallacy).  In fact, I can find zero direct attacks from this subject.  Furthermore, I fail to see where Dr. Dunkenstein has provided any significant contributions to the topic, other than his entirely valid and reasonable opinion.

You have taken something that did not happen and used it to provide a broad indictment of an entire group.  

Wow, must have lots of time on your hands to go back and research someone's posts!

[rocky_warrior]

Wow, must have lots of time on your hands to go back and research someone's posts!

Perhaps you missed that there were only 15 posts to research, and only two of those he could possibly have been attacked for on this subject   I think It took me longer to repond to this that that research would have taken!

"so I went to go look at his body of work.  All fifteen posts.  He had two posts on the subject of Otule"

[Windyplayer]

Perhaps you missed that there were only 15 posts to research, and only two of those he could possibly have been attacked for on this subject   I think It took me longer to repond to this that that research would have taken!

"so I went to go look at his body of work.  All fifteen posts.  He had two posts on the subject of Otule"

Wow, must have lots of time on your hands to go back and research someone's posts and rebut someone's claim that you have a lot of time on your hands.