Real Time RPI does not have us in...

[Norm]

OK, here's top 50 broken down by 1-25 and 1-50:

Marquette: 1-25: 5-12  1-50: 5-12 (all top 50 games were against 1-25 in RPI)
Michigan: 1-25: 0-8  1-50: 6-9 (all wins vs. #26-50)
Michigan State: 1-25: 2-8  1-50: 5-13
Penn State: 1-25: 1-5  1-50: 5-9 (did not play a top 50 team out of conference)
Illinois: 1-25: 2-6  1-50: 5-10

Marquette has as many Top 25 wins as Michigan, Michigan State, Penn State and Illinois combined.

[Fullodds]

I wouldn't call losing to SH on the road a 'bad loss'. 102 RPI that missed its best player for a substantial amount of time. It might be our worst loss, but it came on the road against a team that was arguably better than their RPI suggests. SH is not Iowa.

[MountainCreekHouse]

I wouldn't call losing to SH on the road a 'bad loss'. 102 RPI that missed its best player for a substantial amount of time. It might be our worst loss, but it came on the road against a team that was arguably better than their RPI suggests. SH is not Iowa.

I agree with this whole heartedly. what im concerned with whether or not we can esacape the grasps of an 8 or 9 seed. now lets open up discussion about IU losing to Iowa twice... (enter chico)


lollerskates

[brewcity77]

Just looked at RealTimeRPI's joke of a bracket. Cleveland State and Missouri State are both in, yet we're out? Cleveland State has zero top-50 RPI wins and one sub-100 loss with an SOS over 100 and 19 of their 24 wins come against sub-100 teams. Missouri State is the same, except they have two sub-100 losses and 22 of their 25 wins come against sub-100 teams. They exist only as products of RPI. If that were the only factor used, they'd be in. If any other stat is used, they'll be out. RealTimeRPI is clueless.