collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by mileskishnish72
[Today at 07:30:45 AM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by onepost
[May 13, 2025, 11:23:07 PM]


Pearson to MU by willie warrior
[May 13, 2025, 06:07:05 PM]


Mid-season grades by Jay Bee
[May 13, 2025, 02:05:55 PM]


Kam update by MUbiz
[May 13, 2025, 01:53:14 PM]


NIL Money by The Sultan
[May 13, 2025, 01:03:40 PM]


Marquette/Indiana Finalizing Agreement by PointWarrior
[May 13, 2025, 09:52:07 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

MUDPT

So as I was thinking about how MU's bracket shakes out for the BET and how if all of the higher seeds win, MU has played well against everybody until the championship (WV, U of L, ND).  I got to thinking about how all of the other teams fared against who they would play as well.  Of course we had to go tempo free and I came up with this.  This is hypothetical if the higher seeds won:  Pitt's efficiency is calculated points per possession (against Georgetown, Syracuse, Notre Dame this year); Marquette (against WV, Louisville, ND, and Pitt this year) etc..  So here I think is the correct data.

Pitt: Off. 1.10; Def. 1.00 Margin- +.10
ND:    Off. 1.18; Def. 1.05 Margin- +.13
UofL:  Off. 0.98; Def. 1.01 Margin- -.03
Cuse:  Off. 1.05; Def. 0.95 Margin- +.10
St. J:   Off. 0.94; Def. 1.10 Margin- -.16
WV:     Off. 1.02; Def. 1.09 Margin- -.07
Cincy:  Off 0.92; Def. 1.00 Margin- -.08
GTown: Off 0.96; Def. 1.08 Margin- -.12
UConn: Off 1.07; Def. 1.07 Margin- 0
Nova:   Off 1.05; Def. 1.09 Margin- -.04
MU:      Off 1.17; Def. 1.07 Margin- +.10
SH:      Off 0.97; Def. 0.97 Margin- 0
RU:      Off 1; Def. 1.04 Margin- -.04
PU:       Off 0.98; Def 1.17 Margin- -.19
USF:     Off 0.98; Def 1.19 Margin -.21
DePaul: Off 0.88; Def 1.27 Margin- -.39

If there is a silver lining, it's that our bad losses this year in the Big East all come from the top of the bracket.

Interesting notes: St. John's got beat pretty good by both Syracuse and Seton Hall, not to mention ND who they would hypothetically face in the championship.
Seton Hall beat both Syracuse and St. John's by a wide margin, the reason for their null efficiency margin.
If you are looking for a reason not to bet on DePaul other than them being seeded 16th, it's that their potential opponents beat them by: 20, 11, 30, 48, and 25.

Dawson Rental

"If there is a silver lining, it's that our bad losses this year in the Big East all come from the top of the bracket."


Sorry to disappoint, but we have no bad losses.  At least not as that is defined by the selection committee.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Previous topic - Next topic