collapse

Resources

Stud of Seton Hall Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Happy New Year by jesmu84
[Today at 10:12:57 AM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by willie warrior
[Today at 10:01:37 AM]


Path to Success 2025-26 in 2026: Rotations by HutchwasClutch
[Today at 09:57:37 AM]


The Altercation by willie warrior
[Today at 09:53:07 AM]


A Collective Failure by willie warrior
[Today at 09:49:42 AM]


Recruiting as of 1/15/26 by willie warrior
[Today at 09:47:11 AM]


Ben Gold Post Game 12/30 by Badgerhater
[Today at 09:31:09 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: @ UConn

Marquette
73
Marquette @
UConn
Date/Time: Jan 4, 2026, 1:00pm
TV: NBC
Schedule for 2025-26
Seton Hall
79

bamamarquettefan

As Chicos pointed out, only two other teams have made the tourney with an RPI of 70 or worse, but very few teams miss that Dance Card said would be in.  Something has to give.

Forecast RPI predicts a 9-9 finish, and

Calculates that if this happens Dance Card would calculate not only that MU would be in, but that we would be the top 9 seed in the tournament, meaning that we still have a cushion of more than 10 teams between us and elimination.

Just win baby!
The www.valueaddsports.com analysis of basketball, football and baseball players are intended to neither be too hot or too cold - hundreds immerse themselves in studies of stats not of interest to broader fan bases (too hot), while others still insist on pure observation (too cold).

brewcity77

Hmm...that's odd. At-larges like Xavier, Baylor, and Oklahoma State lag behind us seed-wise, but are given a much higher probability of making the field as at-large teams. I guess I get Xavier, they're predicted to win out, but they are given a better at-large rank and have a much better RPI, so why seed them lower? Baylor I guess I can see, they have a tough run-out including Missouri on the road and Texas at home, but they are also higher than us in both at-large rank and RPI, while being predicted for a 9-7 conference finish. And I just don't get Oklahoma State at all. Projected for a 6-10 Big 12 record with only two wins over other teams projected "in"; Missouri and Kansas State? I'd be very curious as to the logic behind their predictions.

Previous topic - Next topic