collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

The Altercation by wadesworld
[Today at 01:37:41 PM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by MU82
[Today at 01:26:35 PM]


NM by MU82
[Today at 01:01:04 PM]


How Shaka Can Save This Season by Jay Bee
[Today at 12:41:54 PM]


Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by ATL MU Warrior
[Today at 11:51:30 AM]


[Paint Touches] Marquette Minutes Projections for 2026 by Jay Bee
[Today at 09:25:42 AM]


2026 Transfer Portal Wishlist by GoldenEagles03
[Today at 01:19:26 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

dsfire

Quote from: MUDPT on October 18, 2010, 09:46:10 AM
Basketball Prospectus ran a little profile this summer how Wes's success in Utah was more a product of Sloan's system than his ability as a player.  Their argument was that you could plug in any decent guard with the right attitude and they would have relative success.  That being said there was an article posted last week about Portland was using Matthews as a point guard with great success.  They mentioned that him and Roy in the back court was a match up problem because of their height together.  They were also complimentary of his ability to match up with Deron Williams in a pre-season game.
Wow.  Would not have pictured Wes as an NBA point guard.

MerrittsMustache

Quote from: MUDPT on October 18, 2010, 09:46:10 AM
Basketball Prospectus ran a little profile this summer how Wes's success in Utah was more a product of Sloan's system than his ability as a player.  Their argument was that you could plug in any decent guard with the right attitude and they would have relative success.  That being said there was an article posted last week about Portland was using Matthews as a point guard with great success.  They mentioned that him and Roy in the back court was a match up problem because of their height together.  They were also complimentary of his ability to match up with Deron Williams in a pre-season game.

Wes at the point is definitely interesting. Although, Nate McMillan is about Wes' size (if I'm not mistaken) and he was an excellent PG in his day so maybe he sees a little of himself in Wes.

Many fans picture the PG being a quick, little ballhandler/passer like Steve Nash or Isiah Thomas but in today's NBA, many teams simply need a guy with a high basketball IQ to keep the offense under control, knock down open shots, make good decisions with the ball and defend well on the other end. Wes definitely fits that description. Not every PG needs to be a penatrating playmaker for a team to be successful. The stars are the ones who have the ball in their hands most of the time anyway and they're the ones who are expected to make the big plays. PGs are often times just solid role players.

reinko

Quote from: dgies9156 on October 18, 2010, 10:17:09 AM
What is everyone complaining about? How many of you would turn down $33 million, regardless of whether you're worth it or not. I'm happy for Wes and optimistic that he'll be a poster child for the best Marquette has to offer.

I'm waiting for Wes to tell Portland, "I'll give you my $33 million worth and not a cent more!"

Seriously gang, he's coached by fellow Warrior grad Maurice Lucas. He'll be great!!!!

Nobody is complaining.  None of us have said we would turn down 33 large.  We are all happy for Wes.  And we all think he is a great poster child for MU.


Previous topic - Next topic