collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2025-26 Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[Today at 04:09:13 PM]


Any Updates On Men's Basketball Practice Facility Funding? by TedBaxter
[September 12, 2025, 03:22:21 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Dawson Rental

#25
Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on May 17, 2010, 11:40:32 AM

"Likely" the floor???

C'mon...Damon Key was a Wooden nominee his senior year...one of only 20 players so nominated.  Gardner isn't "likely" to be the next Damon Key anymore than Vander Blue is "likely" to be the next DWade.

If Key was a Wooden nominee, I bet it was a preseason nomination.  Now the Wooden nominations are made preseason (50), mid-season (30), and just prior to the NCAA tournament (20).  Then a 10 member All-American team is voted from the final list of 20.  Key was a very good player, never an outstanding player.  I'm sure that the Wooden nomination was based on his prior three years as a starter.  I doubt, but don't know that Key was in the final 20.  I know that he didn't make the all-American team.  

Another thing about Key is the amazing consistency of his statistics.  He scored 13.2 to 13.6 points per game, and had the exact same rebounding figures 5.7 for his first three years.  His senior year Curry had graduated, and it would have been a natural assumption that Key's numbers would climb considerably as a result.  While he did get and extra basket and two more rebounds per game in 1993-94, I think that more was expected.  That year was the only year that McIlvaine out rebounded Damon, by half a rebound per game.

I still believe that Gardner has more talent than Key, and IF he gets into condition for the Big East AND can play defense to Buzz's satisfaction sooner rather than later (or not at all), I think that he'll be better statistically than Key.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

El Duderino

Quote from: downtown85 on May 15, 2010, 07:56:14 AM
I hear he has good ball handling and shooting skills for a player his size, too.  Quickness is the biggest question mark.  If he can get into the proper shape that should come along too.  Lots of potential!!

I also am quite excited about the basketball skills he can provide the team going forward, but think the by far biggest concern is if the kid can handle the physical conditioning demands that Buzz will surely place on him. If Gardner can stay in good shape, i can see him becoming a force by say his junior year. Sizable if though, no pun intended.

APieperFan3

how often can we expect to see gardner and otule on the floor at the same time?

how about in future years!?

The "average fan" is an idiot.

bma725

Quote from: LittleMurs on May 17, 2010, 01:23:29 PM
If Key was a Wooden nominee, I bet it was a preseason nomination.  Now the Wooden nominations are made preseason (50), mid-season (30), and just prior to the NCAA tournament (20).  Then a 10 member All-American team is voted from the final list of 20.  Key was a very good player, never an outstanding player.  I'm sure that the Wooden nomination was based on his prior three years as a starter.  I doubt, but don't know that Key was in the final 20.  I know that he didn't make the all-American team.  

The Wooden award back then was a bit different, but he was one of the final 25 nominees.  Having said that, I think you seriously underestimate Damon Key.

The comparison between Gardner and Key coming out of high school isn't even close...Key wins by a mile.  Key was a Top 60 prospect in the country according to HoopScoop and Bob Gibbons, good enough to win Mr. Basketball in a loaded year where Wisconsin had three other Top 100 prospects(McIlvaine, Logtermann, Rankin).  He was invited to two camps that only brought in the Top 75 or so prospects in the country, and named among the best players at one of those camps.  He was the best player on one of the top AAU teams in the country

Gardner isn't on anyone's Top 150, and isn't thought to be among the Top 30 or in some cases Top 40 centers in this class.  The only comparison between the two is size, other than that, Gardner isn't in Key's league.


GGGG

Thanks bma...

I don't mind if people project that Gardner might be better than Key, but to say that Key's carreer is the "likely floor" for Gardner means that you are either seriously overestimating Gardner or don't understand how good Damon Key was.

MU_Iceman

Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on May 18, 2010, 07:25:26 AM
Thanks bma...

I don't mind if people project that Gardner might be better than Key, but to say that Key's carreer is the "likely floor" for Gardner means that you are either seriously overestimating Gardner or don't understand how good Damon Key was.

Agreed..."likely floor" is about as assinine a statement as I've heard in a while...I'm of the mindset that if Gardner can develop into a similar player to Key and produce at the same level Key did in his frosh and soph years by Gardner's senior year, we should all be thrilled...

Dawson Rental

One point that nobody's mentioned is that I have David Boone has Gardner's "ceiling", and its clear from the last few comments that their authors would almost certainly take Damon Key over David Boone.

I was aware that Damon was as highly ranked as he was in high school, and was O'Neill's biggest "catch" of a truly outstanding recruiting year.  Damon also was the most college ready in that class and he started ahead of McIlvaine at center for the bulk, if not all of their freshman years.  Although, Mac did have the concussion problem at the start of his first year.  I probably short Damon, in part, because so much was expected when he came to MU, and then after that great freshman year, he just seemed to stagnate, at least statistically.

Based on the quality of the posters doubting my sanity, I'm almost certainly hyper ventilating regarding Gardner.  However, I really think that he has a special knack for scoring in the lane.  He had great rebounding figures in high school.  Will that transfer to the Division I level?  I can't say that I know.  I hope so.  In no way will he be ready to defend the way Key did form the start.  If he doesn't pick it up quickly, His post scoring won't do MU much good on the bench.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Badgerhater

Before we get all caught up in comparing him to Key and Boone....I would be ecstatic if he could replicate as a freshman Dwight Burke's senior year. 
When we stop talking, really bad stuff happens.

BCHoopster

Dwight Burke quality would be huge.  I remember seeing Brian Williams of Tennessee and I think he
weight in at 360, he took off the weight and played pretty well as a junior.  Before that not much,
his senior year should be very productive.  First you have to lose the weight, then you have to put
on muscle, it will take a few years.  Otule and Garnder are both projects, Otule may help next year,
but he has been hurt for two years, lets see if he can make a whole season, much like Justin Harrell
of the Pack.

GGGG

Quote from: LittleMurs on May 19, 2010, 07:15:33 PM
I was aware that Damon was as highly ranked as he was in high school, and was O'Neill's biggest "catch" of a truly outstanding recruiting year.  Damon also was the most college ready in that class and he started ahead of McIlvaine at center for the bulk, if not all of their freshman years.  Although, Mac did have the concussion problem at the start of his first year.  I probably short Damon, in part, because so much was expected when he came to MU, and then after that great freshman year, he just seemed to stagnate, at least statistically.


Honestly, you are the first person I have ever heard say that Key "stagnated" while at MU.

MuMark

Key's first 3 years were almost identical statistically.

Stagnate might be one word to use.......consistent might be another.

He did take a nice jump up as a senior.

I know he couldn't jump but he only blocked 7 shots in his entire career?  :o

http://wiki.muscoop.com/doku.php/men_s_basketball/damon_key

Dawson Rental

Quote from: MuMark on May 20, 2010, 11:56:12 AM
Key's first 3 years were almost identical statistically.

Stagnate might be one word to use.......consistent might be another.

http://wiki.muscoop.com/doku.php/men_s_basketball/damon_key

It wouldn't be ludicrous to argue that Key's best year was his freshman year.  The usual expectation is that a player will show improvement from year to year, but in Key's case what we saw saw from him his freshman year (which was a sweet freshman year) was pretty much who he stayed the next three years.

Quote from: MuMark on May 20, 2010, 11:56:12 AM

He did take a nice jump up as a senior.


One basket (two points) and two rebounds a game is a nice jump?  I think that those increases were due more to Ron Curry graduating and being replaced with Roney Eford than any improvement in Damon's game.  Curry was a great rebounder.  I suppose the argument can cut both ways.  Maybe Damon would have had gaudier stats if he hadn't been playing on the same team as Curry his first three years.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

willie warrior

Key was a damn good 4 year player and if some say Gardner will be better, that would be great. But let's wait and see how he does this year.

If my memory serves me, Key was not a first option too often, and did a lot of his scoring from 10 to 15 feet. He was a stud however!
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

GOMU85

Quote from: Badgerhater on May 20, 2010, 11:21:58 AM
Before we get all caught up in comparing him to Key and Boone....I would be ecstatic if he could replicate as a freshman Dwight Burke's senior year. 

TWO THUMBS UP

Mobot

Quote from: LittleMurs on May 20, 2010, 04:00:10 PM

One basket (two points) and two rebounds a game is a nice jump?  I think that those increases were due more to Ron Curry graduating and being replaced with Roney Eford than any improvement in Damon's game.  Curry was a great rebounder.  I suppose the argument can cut both ways.  Maybe Damon would have had gaudier stats if he hadn't been playing on the same team as Curry his first three years.

Didn't Eford start along with Curry as a freshman for most of the 92-93 season?  I thought that Mcllvaine replaced Curry in the starting line up in 93-94.  Correct me if I am wrong, I was in grade school at the time.

6746jonesr

My recollection of Damon Key is that he was a very good player as a freshman, but developed a significant weight issue.  As one of the Asst. Coaches used to say to me, it was very difficult to get Key to step away from the buffet.  So. talent was not an issue with him, and I saw him a few years ago and he continues to struggle with his weight.  Eford did end up playing significant minutes as a freshman, primarily because the team was offensively challenged, and the one thing that eford could do was create his own shot.  I recall that he had difficulty understanding the plays, and often looked confused out there, but they really needed his contributions as a freshman.  To return to the Gardner issue, I would be very happy if his skill set is equivalent to Key's, but hope that he does not encounter the same challenges with the training table.

mviale

Gardner is a clone of Damon Key.  Rjax was more athletic
You heard it here first. Davante Gardner will be a Beast this year.
http://www.muscoop.com/index.php?topic=27259

ATWizJr

Quote from: mviale on May 20, 2010, 11:10:34 PM
Gardner is a clone of Damon Key.  Rjax was more athletic
Has Gardner suddenly become a top 60 recruit?  If not, you are off base on this clone stuff.

JWags85

Quote from: mviale on May 20, 2010, 11:10:34 PM
Gardner is a clone of Damon Key.  Rjax was more athletic

He could just be referring to build and size, not actual ability or potential performance.

ATWizJr

Quote from: JWags85 on May 21, 2010, 10:25:32 AM
He could just be referring to build and size, not actual ability or potential performance.
I hope he's right!

Previous topic - Next topic