Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Stud of Seton Hall Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Ben Gold Post Game 12/30 by tower912
[Today at 05:31:30 AM]


A Collective Failure by willie warrior
[Today at 03:48:06 AM]


Marquette Team Rankings by Jay Bee
[Today at 03:16:18 AM]


The Altercation by onepost
[Today at 12:55:58 AM]


A loser's tax for Shaka? by 1SE
[Today at 12:33:51 AM]


MU/Hall Game Thread by rocky_warrior
[Today at 12:00:55 AM]


2025-26 Big East Conference TV Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[December 30, 2025, 10:48:10 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: @ UConn

Marquette
73
Marquette @
UConn
Date/Time: Jan 4, 2026, 1:00pm
TV: NBC
Schedule for 2025-26
Seton Hall
79

willie warrior

Does anybody know how the NCAA RPI works?

We are currently 58. Two teams ranked ahead of us that I would question are Cincy at 56 and Marshall at 57. (Marshall is 4-0 against Non D1 teams. Talk about cupcakes.) Another one that looks iffy is Seton Hall at 51. They are 15-10 with 15 home games already.

We have lost to numbers 4, 5, 8 twice, 9 and 19, while beating 11, 20 and 45. And why wouldn't beating Xavier at 20 be a "quality win"? Did not see that listed on our "resume" during the game yesterday.

We are ranked considerably better in Pomeroy and Sagarin. Does the seelction committee  look at other computer rankings?
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

Benny B

From the blow-hole of Eamonn Brennan (who participated in this year's mock selection):

"Does the committee care about tempo-free? Kind of, but not really. Ken Pomeroy's invaluable efficiency ratings are explicitly listed in the "resources" section of our committee materials, alongside Sagarain ratings and Jerry Palm's CollegeRPI.com. But they're listed last, and in our committee, which is made up of media members who write about basketball numbers for a living (and not, you know, conference commissioners and athletic directors), Ken Pomeroy's stats came up maybe once or twice. (They did play a role in the committee recognizing Marquette was this year's most unlucky team, but we might have reached that committee Pomeroy-or-no.)"
Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

TomW1365

As reported a few times on many of the MUScoop threads, RPI doesn't take into account how close games were, just wins and losses against opponents.  The other resources you named take loss margin into account among other things. 

ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: willie warrior on February 22, 2010, 02:47:09 PM
Does anybody know how the NCAA RPI works?

We are currently 58. Two teams ranked ahead of us that I would question are Cincy at 56 and Marshall at 57. (Marshall is 4-0 against Non D1 teams. Talk about cupcakes.) Another one that looks iffy is Seton Hall at 51. They are 15-10 with 15 home games already.

We have lost to numbers 4, 5, 8 twice, 9 and 19, while beating 11, 20 and 45. And why wouldn't beating Xavier at 20 be a "quality win"? Did not see that listed on our "resume" during the game yesterday.

We are ranked considerably better in Pomeroy and Sagarin. Does the seelction committee  look at other computer rankings?

Simply put....score of game is no factor in RPI.  Did you win or did you lose and where was the game played (home, away, neutral).

Previous topic - Next topic