collapse

Resources

Stud of Little Rock Game

Chase Ross

16 points, 3 rebounds,
5 assists, 1 steal,
23 minutes

2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross3

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Bankrupt upfront by Small Orange Soda
[Today at 02:00:33 AM]


Buzz Cut by Farley36
[Today at 12:16:43 AM]


2025 Transfer Portal by Daniel
[November 15, 2025, 11:55:18 PM]


Let's talk defense by brewcity77
[November 15, 2025, 11:30:24 PM]


We May Be In Serious Trouble by brewcity77
[November 15, 2025, 10:51:06 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by MuggsyB
[November 15, 2025, 08:36:44 PM]


It’s Time to Think Bold by Uncle Rico
[November 15, 2025, 08:35:41 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Dayton

Marquette
82
Marquette vs.
Dayton
Date/Time: Nov 19, 2025, 6:30pm
TV: TruTV
Schedule for 2025-26
Maryland
89

MUrugger

Sure it's early but what's the board for but to speculate and hope...

The BE is well represented with 5 of the top 12 and a 6th at 23.  If past performance is an indication of future results...and the committee mirrors somewhat the current Lunardi view, no more than 8 BE teams will make it.

Let's give six spots to those referenced above:
1.  #4 Villanova
2.  #5 Syracuse
3.  #8 West Virginia
4.  #10 Pittsburgh
5.  #12 Georgetown
6.  #23 Connecticut

The next list of five is my own subjective ranking of teams, based on both performance and projections (subject to debate) and shakes out like this:
7. Louisville
8. Marquette
9. Notre Dame
10. Cincinnati
11. Providence
12. Seton Hall
13. St. John's

That leaves MU fighting hard with 'Ville, ND, and Cincy for two spots and likely two of those teams OUT.  The other three listed probably would rank themselves higher than I did and have dreams of dancing too.  Also the chances of just 7 being selected are probably greater than 9.  It's tight.  And there is little margin for error.



MU_Iceman

Keep in mind that the tourney committee has a history of elevating teams with players on their roster that the public wants to see.

Right now Harangody is, statistically, one of the best players in college basketball and he's a "human-interest-piece" of sorts in that he bypassed the draft (albeit because he knew he wasn't lottery material) to return for his senior season...

Short of ND tanking down the stretch or MU winning one of its bigger road games (UConn / Syracuse), I wouldn't be surprised if ND got the nod ahead of us simply because of Harangody's stature in the college b-ball community...

Also, Cinci does have a potential lottery pick in Lance Stephenson that the committee may decide they want to showcase in the tournament as well...

So I say MU should just go out, run the table, and leave no doubt on selection sunday!  :)

Buzz Williams' Spillproof Chiclets Cup

Quote from: MU_Iceman on January 14, 2010, 04:20:22 PM
So I say MU should just go out, run the table, and leave no doubt on selection sunday!  :)

Only one thing left to do....

Win the whole.....[expletive].....thing...
“These guys in this locker room are all warriors -- every one of them. We ought to change our name back from the Golden Eagles because Warriors are what we really are." ~Wesley Matthews

bilsu

We should not talk about the tournament until we are .500 in league play.

MUrugger

And if we never get to .500 then we deny ourselves the chance to talk about it?  As stated originally, speculation and hope is what this board (and this thread) are all about.  Debbie Downer.

HoopsMalone

The Pac-10 might only put two or three teams in.  It would not be a huge stretch for the other major conferences to put more teams in this year.

🏀

Quote from: notkirkcameron on January 14, 2010, 05:51:33 PM
Only one thing left to do....

Win the whole.....[expletive].....thing...

Perfect. Just [expletive] perfect.

Previous topic - Next topic