collapse

Resources

Stud of Xavier Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross5
James Jr3
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2025-26 College Hoops Thread by MU82
[February 16, 2026, 10:40:09 PM]


Really Good Day for the Future of Marquette Basketball by Pakuni
[February 16, 2026, 10:38:45 PM]


[Cracked Sidewalks] 1 in 14,000,605 by Daniel
[February 16, 2026, 09:59:41 PM]


2026 Coaching Carousel by WhiteTrash
[February 16, 2026, 08:12:48 PM]


2025-26 Big East Conference TV Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[February 16, 2026, 07:53:30 PM]


That Hurt. A lot. by BM1090
[February 16, 2026, 01:39:02 PM]


James/Stevens by Billy Hoyle
[February 16, 2026, 01:01:54 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  St. John's

Marquette
88
Marquette vs
St. John's
Date/Time: Feb 18, 2026, 8:00pm
TV: TNT
Schedule for 2025-26
Xavier
96

Hey DeDe


Hards Alumni

the correct response to the stated question is.

unequivocally, yes.

jaybilaswho?

Quote from: ecompt on January 28, 2009, 02:36:23 PM
Zar's going to be able to do whatever he wants on offense next year. He'll be the unquestioned go-to guy on a very young team. I don't think there's any question that he stays.

But will his being the go to guy next year help or hurt in NBA stock? He has certainly been shining in the shadow of the big three. As the fourth offensive option he has done great things. Can he carry that on next year when there is no more shadow to shine in? As he moves to the main guy he gains shots and the ability to play a more NBA suitable position, but he does also gain the attention of 3 more defenders that in years past have been busy with the three amigos. I honestly do not know if he will be able to continue on his current 'learning'/improvement curve.
"A team should be an extension of a coach's personality. My teams are arrogant and obnoxious." Al McGuire

MR.HAYWARD

if every kid that scored 15 points a game as a junior in was good enough to play in the NBA the NBA would need to be about 400 teams. 

Hayward has a chance to play in the league but it will take another 18 months of incredibly hard work and dramatic improvement.  Not to say he is not a very fine collge bball player but the NBA is the best league in the world and only has about 45 openings a year.

WashDCWarrior

I fully expect significant statistical improvement next year. Something like 21 and 9. That's going to get a lot of notice in the Big East. He is sort of in between a 2 and a 3 in NBA terms, but the fact that he plays much taller than his height will help with that.  He plays bigger than Novak despite giving up 4 inches.

All that said, I see him as an early 2nd rounder next year

MUSF

Quote from: RichardShaw on January 28, 2009, 03:48:13 PM
The first guy that comes to mind when comparing Lazar is Alando Tucker.  They are similar size, builds, and quickness.  They both can score from just about anywhere and have a knack for the ball.  Tucker was a very good college basketball player and can't get near the court at the next level.  I wish him all the best, but I don't see Hayward being a contributor at the next level.  That said, he could make a roster.

+1

I said the exact same thing the last time we had the Lazar to the NBA discussion.  His game really doesn't translate to the NBA.  That said, he is a great college player and we are lucky to have him.

BTW, I love the Richard Shaw handle.  Unless you actually are Richard Shaw, in which case, I hate you.

Previous topic - Next topic