collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

New Uniform Numbers by brewcity77
[Today at 05:47:34 AM]


2025 Coaching Carousel by The Lens
[June 07, 2025, 10:14:17 PM]


NCAA Tournament expansion as early as next season. by Mutaman
[June 07, 2025, 10:06:33 PM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by Scoop Snoop
[June 07, 2025, 02:42:57 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by mileskishnish72
[June 07, 2025, 01:39:45 PM]


NCAA settlement approved - schools now can (and will) directly pay athletes by Jay Bee
[June 07, 2025, 10:33:57 AM]


NM by MU82
[June 07, 2025, 10:17:40 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

NavinRJohnson

Remind me next year when I am one of the many gnashing teeth over MU's seed. Will be a 6, a 5, a 3? Who cares? With the exception of getting a number 1, and possibly a number 2, it is basically meaningless. As has been demonstrated very well, the difference between a 6 -10 seed and a 2 or a 3 seed is negligible, if any. This tournament is about who you play, how you play, and occasionally where you play. It is all about match ups and very little about the number next to your name.

It was either Clark Kellog or Seth Davis that said yesterday that the world is flat. Not exactly sure what that means exactly, but I understood his point, and he was absolutely right.

kira67

Sure. Teams from major like Villanova, Clemson, Vanderbilt, Arizona, Texas A&M, Purdue... can beat any team seeded from 2 to 12. And teams like Davidson, Gonzaga, Butler can also beat any team from the majors.

I think that the number ones are still a bit better.


ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: NavinRJohnson on March 23, 2008, 05:31:05 PM
Remind me next year when I am one of the many gnashing teeth over MU's seed. Will be a 6, a 5, a 3? Who cares? With the exception of getting a number 1, and possibly a number 2, it is basically meaningless. As has been demonstrated very well, the difference between a 6 -10 seed and a 2 or a 3 seed is negligible, if any. This tournament is about who you play, how you play, and occasionally where you play. It is all about match ups and very little about the number next to your name.

It was either Clark Kellog or Seth Davis that said yesterday that the world is flat. Not exactly sure what that means exactly, but I understood his point, and he was absolutely right.

The difference is your first round game....for example MU played a tough game followed by a tough game.  Stanford got a layup where most of their guys played 20 minutes and then had to play us.

dwaderoy2004

Furthermore, as you pointed out, the tournament is about where you play.  You think Stanford, as a 3 seed, enjoyed playing in their home state?

NavinRJohnson

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 24, 2008, 09:19:38 AM
Quote from: NavinRJohnson on March 23, 2008, 05:31:05 PM
Remind me next year when I am one of the many gnashing teeth over MU's seed. Will be a 6, a 5, a 3? Who cares? With the exception of getting a number 1, and possibly a number 2, it is basically meaningless. As has been demonstrated very well, the difference between a 6 -10 seed and a 2 or a 3 seed is negligible, if any. This tournament is about who you play, how you play, and occasionally where you play. It is all about match ups and very little about the number next to your name.

It was either Clark Kellog or Seth Davis that said yesterday that the world is flat. Not exactly sure what that means exactly, but I understood his point, and he was absolutely right.

The difference is your first round game....for example MU played a tough game followed by a tough game.  Stanford got a layup where most of their guys played 20 minutes and then had to play us.

Tell that to Vandy, UConn, Duke, etc. Of course there is a difference, but that difference appears to get harder and harder to detect each year. Unless you are a 1 or a 2 and maybe the first couple 3's, you just better be a good team, or you probably aren't going to win.

Previous topic - Next topic