Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


jesmu84


NCMUFan

But was there a breathing closing attorney?

PointWarrior

#352
Probably, but a lot less breathes by the attorney during this transaction.


Quote from: NCMUFan on May 29, 2026, 11:29:29 AMBut was there a breathing closing attorney?

MU82

From Axios:

AI tools might be hallucinating less. But they're still spitting out inaccurate answers cloaked in polished, hyper-confident language.

Why it matters: The more people trust AI, the less likely they are to catch costly mistakes. It's a growing problem as people increasingly lean on the technology for research, medical advice and schoolwork.

The big picture: Obvious hallucinations are easy to catch. The real trouble comes from false answers that sound convincing.

Plausible citations, mostly correct summaries, and confidently wrong answers slip past users.

If AI becomes accurate enough often enough, people might stop fact-checking altogether.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

PointWarrior


Easy answer - actually read the AI output. Bad AI output is either lazy input, lazy prompting, or lazy checking.    But that's most of the workforce today...

Quote from: MU82 on May 30, 2026, 09:51:09 AMFrom Axios:

AI tools might be hallucinating less. But they're still spitting out inaccurate answers cloaked in polished, hyper-confident language.

Why it matters: The more people trust AI, the less likely they are to catch costly mistakes. It's a growing problem as people increasingly lean on the technology for research, medical advice and schoolwork.

The big picture: Obvious hallucinations are easy to catch. The real trouble comes from false answers that sound convincing.

Plausible citations, mostly correct summaries, and confidently wrong answers slip past users.

If AI becomes accurate enough often enough, people might stop fact-checking altogether.


NCMUFan

Quote from: PointWarrior on May 30, 2026, 03:16:34 PMEasy answer - actually read the AI output. Bad AI output is either lazy input, lazy prompting, or lazy checking.    But that's most of the workforce today...

But do you do more than read the AI output?  Do you fact check the output AI provides you?
AI has a huge ego for not being wrong and pinning it on only bad prompts seems pretty lazy in itself.

Previous topic - Next topic