The Shaka Era is happening!

[Vander Blue Man Group]

Still no acknowledgement of your faux pas...the coward lives on 

I'd acknowledge a mistake if I actually made one in this instance but alas...

And you still haven't answered my question about whether you'd rather be in Marquette or IU's position going into the offseason, which I've now asked 3 times. 

[panda]

I'd acknowledge a mistake if I actually made one in this instance but alas...

And you still haven't answered my question about whether you'd rather be in Marquette or IU's position going into the offseason, which I've now asked 3 times. 

A dumb question from a dumb, cowardly person.

Why would I need to pick between the two? They're in no way related.

I would pick Shaka not convincing himself that he can develop 0 star recruits, holding onto players for too long and ignoring modern roster building/augmenting techniques which torpedoed the last two seasons.

[Vander Blue Man Group]

A dumb question from a dumb, cowardly person.

Why would I need to pick between the two? They're in no way related.

I would pick Shaka not convincing himself that he can develop 0 star recruits, holding onto players for too long and ignoring modern roster building/augmenting techniques which torpedoed the last two seasons.

You're so incredibly dim it's honestly hard to believe.

First, to address your little baby tantrum, the topic that was being discussed was OMax.  Not your analysis of Morsell, Kuath, or that entijre class of transfers.  Not sure what that is so difficult for you to grasp. 

Next, the Marquette/IU question is entirely relevant given your excessive whining throughout the season.  Really weird you won't even entertain the question. 

Have a great rest of your Saturday, Biff. 

[Vander Blue Man Group]

You're so incredibly dim it's honestly hard to believe.

First, to address your little baby tantrum, the topic that was being discussed was OMax.  Not your analysis of Morsell, Kuath, or that entijre class of transfers.  Not sure what that is so difficult for you to grasp. 

Next, the Marquette/IU question is entirely relevant given your excessive whining throughout the season.  Really weird you won't even entertain the question. 

Have a great rest of your Saturday, Biff. 

Panda must be off his meds. Just got this doozy of a PM this morning. 

I can see why he was too embarrassed to post it publically.

Really great stuff.

The coward
Sent to: Vander Blue Man Group on: Today at 07:56:25 AM
I want to be very clear here. I could not have been more straightforward saying we were not discussing omax.

Panda - can't say I watched much omax his freshman year, but I lauded kuath morsell and kolek from day 1.

You then went on to say you also were not discussing omax.

Coward - I didn't question what you claimed to say about OMax when he transferred.  I figured it's a coin-toss about whether that was true or not and I don't care enough to waste time looking for it.

To summarize, I wasn't talking about omax and then went on to discuss the rest of the group in the same sentence. You then didn't question what I said about omax when he came here.

I'm going to go into your tiny, stupid little brain for a second because I know you're trying to make a point saying I wouldn't like Shaka getting a player with omax's stats. This is some unbelievably small brained gotcha attempt that fails miserably. You want me to say I would be frustrated and want some big name player, however I have the posting history showing saying I didn't know much about him. In addition to that, I looked at the haul in totality as highly positive.

Nice try moron but you struck out here. I didn't get after Shaka on the omax addition and was very excited about the other additions.

Now to the even stupider Marquette vs. indiana question. Yet another low level gotcha attempt which has no bearing whatsoever on our current situation. You're taking wades level hyperbole and lowering it to a 12 year olds level of competency. Marquette is not in Indiana's position of roster building. We have a tenured coach, they don't. Devries had to make a quick roster overhaul when he came in. Shaka needs to replace 2-4 spots. Shaka did a great job on integrating that amount of transfers onto a current roster (I even very accurately posted about it!) and I'm excited to see him do it again.

To summarize - shut up. You're rebutting with nonsense while I go word by word, post by post proving what a bozo you are. I've tried to be patient and kind to you through our posting history but you've responded with nothing but sarcasm and attempting to talk down to me. Once again, if you come at me, come correct.

Unkindly,
Your daddy panda

[The Sultan]

panda has a history of posting good information and solid opinions, but then self-immolating in spectacular fashion.

[Vander Blue Man Group]

It's something else.

[panda]

Panda must be off his meds. Just got this doozy of a PM this morning. 

I can see why he was too embarrassed to post it publically.

Really great stuff.

The coward
Sent to: Vander Blue Man Group on: Today at 07:56:25 AM
I want to be very clear here. I could not have been more straightforward saying we were not discussing omax.

Panda - can't say I watched much omax his freshman year, but I lauded kuath morsell and kolek from day 1.

You then went on to say you also were not discussing omax.

Coward - I didn't question what you claimed to say about OMax when he transferred.  I figured it's a coin-toss about whether that was true or not and I don't care enough to waste time looking for it.

To summarize, I wasn't talking about omax and then went on to discuss the rest of the group in the same sentence. You then didn't question what I said about omax when he came here.

I'm going to go into your tiny, stupid little brain for a second because I know you're trying to make a point saying I wouldn't like Shaka getting a player with omax's stats. This is some unbelievably small brained gotcha attempt that fails miserably. You want me to say I would be frustrated and want some big name player, however I have the posting history showing saying I didn't know much about him. In addition to that, I looked at the haul in totality as highly positive.

Nice try moron but you struck out here. I didn't get after Shaka on the omax addition and was very excited about the other additions.

Now to the even stupider Marquette vs. indiana question. Yet another low level gotcha attempt which has no bearing whatsoever on our current situation. You're taking wades level hyperbole and lowering it to a 12 year olds level of competency. Marquette is not in Indiana's position of roster building. We have a tenured coach, they don't. Devries had to make a quick roster overhaul when he came in. Shaka needs to replace 2-4 spots. Shaka did a great job on integrating that amount of transfers onto a current roster (I even very accurately posted about it!) and I'm excited to see him do it again.

To summarize - shut up. You're rebutting with nonsense while I go word by word, post by post proving what a bozo you are. I've tried to be patient and kind to you through our posting history but you've responded with nothing but sarcasm and attempting to talk down to me. Once again, if you come at me, come correct.

Unkindly,
Your daddy panda

Hey moron - I supported the totality of incoming transfers once before. I didn't care if one player didn't have a big time
Existing pedigree. I posted about it at the time and brought it up again but you're too stupid to understand that.

If they're good players I'll support them. Shut up once and for all.

Absolute scum bag move posting a dm in public forum.

[panda]

panda has a history of posting good information and solid opinions, but then self-immolating in spectacular fashion.

Thanks sultan - means a lot coming from you 🤝

[Vander Blue Man Group]

Hey moron - I supported the totality of incoming transfers once before. I didn't care if one player didn't have a big time
Existing pedigree. I posted about it at the time and brought it up again but you're too stupid to understand that.

If they're good players I'll support them. Shut up once and for all.

Absolute scum bag move posting a dm in public forum.

When I get something that unhinged via DM I'm certainly going to post it here. 

Btw, the Marquette/IU question was not a "gotchya" question. 

No need to continue to bore the rest of the board with this nonsense.  Enjoy the rest of your weekend.

[panda]

When I get something that unhinged via DM I'm certainly going to post it here. 

Btw, the Marquette/IU question was not a "gotchya" question. 

No need to continue to bore the rest of the board with this nonsense.  Enjoy the rest of your weekend.

Take a hint - if you want to carry this on, reply to the DM. No need to drag down the board with this.

 Something tells me you won't. Cowards are as cowards does.

[wadesworld]

Panda must be off his meds. Just got this doozy of a PM this morning. 

I can see why he was too embarrassed to post it publically.

Really great stuff.

The coward
Sent to: Vander Blue Man Group on: Today at 07:56:25 AM
I want to be very clear here. I could not have been more straightforward saying we were not discussing omax.

Panda - can't say I watched much omax his freshman year, but I lauded kuath morsell and kolek from day 1.

You then went on to say you also were not discussing omax.

Coward - I didn't question what you claimed to say about OMax when he transferred.  I figured it's a coin-toss about whether that was true or not and I don't care enough to waste time looking for it.

To summarize, I wasn't talking about omax and then went on to discuss the rest of the group in the same sentence. You then didn't question what I said about omax when he came here.

I'm going to go into your tiny, stupid little brain for a second because I know you're trying to make a point saying I wouldn't like Shaka getting a player with omax's stats. This is some unbelievably small brained gotcha attempt that fails miserably. You want me to say I would be frustrated and want some big name player, however I have the posting history showing saying I didn't know much about him. In addition to that, I looked at the haul in totality as highly positive.

Nice try moron but you struck out here. I didn't get after Shaka on the omax addition and was very excited about the other additions.

Now to the even stupider Marquette vs. indiana question. Yet another low level gotcha attempt which has no bearing whatsoever on our current situation. You're taking wades level hyperbole and lowering it to a 12 year olds level of competency. Marquette is not in Indiana's position of roster building. We have a tenured coach, they don't. Devries had to make a quick roster overhaul when he came in. Shaka needs to replace 2-4 spots. Shaka did a great job on integrating that amount of transfers onto a current roster (I even very accurately posted about it!) and I'm excited to see him do it again.

To summarize - shut up. You're rebutting with nonsense while I go word by word, post by post proving what a bozo you are. I've tried to be patient and kind to you through our posting history but you've responded with nothing but sarcasm and attempting to talk down to me. Once again, if you come at me, come correct.

Unkindly,
Your daddy panda

Catching strays in PMs!

[panda]

Catching strays in PMs!

It's an expression of endearment buddy. lol 😬