collapse

Resources

Stud of Oklahoma Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

C Hamilton v. Portal addition? by GoFastAndWin
[Today at 04:52:42 PM]


Lineups - just bizarre. Would like to see the contract. by We R Final Four
[Today at 04:45:13 PM]


No Jump Shooters by We R Final Four
[Today at 04:40:36 PM]


Chances vs the Weasels? by wisblue
[Today at 04:35:04 PM]


We're lost out there by brewcity77
[Today at 03:03:40 PM]


MU 2026-27 - Not too early by MU82
[Today at 02:53:25 PM]


Recruiting as of 11/15/25 by Hards Alumni
[Today at 02:41:26 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: @ Wisconsin

Marquette
75
Marquette @
Wisconsin
Date/Time: Dec 6, 2025, 1:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Valparaiso
72

brewcity77

Quote from: GoldenWarrior11 on Today at 01:49:42 PMRemind me - why did McKay transfer out?  Was it his position/role?

Yes, he came assuming he would be a 3/4 wing, but Buzz saw him better suited at the 5. They also weren't sure Otule would be back that year, so that might have impacted the minutes he'd get. So he went to Iowa State where he played two seasons entirely at the 5.

MarquetteMike1977

Northwestern could not get WI turnovers but if Marquette can like TCU did and Marquette makes 3s we have a chance

vogue65

Quote from: The Sultan on Today at 07:59:22 AMThis is just misguided. Shaka could use the transfer portal all he wants - he just doesn't want to.

And this team was ranked in the top 10 just a year ago.

Stop being so dramatic.

Shaka has a boss.
If the boss wanted transfers, the boss would get transfers.
Sorry, that's probably a little too dramatic.
O.K., if an academically qualified player with a strong basketball resume, good references and recommendations wanted to transfer and he would demonstrably fill a need, he would be signed. 
Now to find such an individual.

The Sultan

Quote from: vogue65 on Today at 03:15:53 PMShaka has a boss.
If the boss wanted transfers, the boss would get transfers.
Sorry, that's probably a little too dramatic.
O.K., if an academically qualified player with a strong basketball resume, good references and recommendations wanted to transfer and he would demonstrably fill a need, he would be signed. 
Now to find such an individual.


If Shaka wanted transfers, Marquette would accept transfers. Why is this so hard to understand?
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

wisblue

Quote from: brewcity77 on Today at 08:17:06 AMIt wouldn't be.

If you go through T-Rank, Marquette was playing like the #16 team in the country to that point of the 2023 season, Wisconsin was playing like the #55 team in the country. It isn't quite apples to apples, but when current #56 Butler plays at #15 St. John's this year, T-Rank has Butler as a +12.2 point underdog with a 14% chance to win.

Currently, T-Rank has us as a +10.4 underdog with an 18% chance to win. That's using preseason data. If you filter it to just this year, we are ranked #112 and Wisconsin is #35. If you look at when current #112 DePaul plays at current #38 Creighton, they are +11.4 with a 15% chance to win.

The spread was likely lower at the time because Vegas was factoring in preseason expectations that had us ranked #32 in kenpom and Wisconsin just slightly behind at #47, but we all know the gap in reality was much larger between those two teams. Any way you split it, the probabilities would be within a few points on either spreads or percentages.

We'll have to agree to disagree on this point.

When UW beat MU in 2022 it wasn't considered an upset. If MU wins on Saturday as a double digit underdog it would be a shocker, especially to anyone who has watched MU struggle at home against CMU and Valpo. 




vogue65

Quote from: The Sultan on Today at 03:18:02 PMIf Shaka wanted transfers, Marquette would accept transfers. Why is this so hard to understand?

Because there are selection criteria. 
You are correct, I don't know the rest of the story.  Nevertheless, Marquette looks to me more like Northwestern or Princeton than St. John's or Seton Hall. 
Remember when the decision-makers wanted MU to reassemble Duke?

The Sultan

Quote from: wisblue on Today at 03:20:24 PMWhen UW beat MU in 2022 it wasn't considered an upset.

It was literally an upset.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

The Sultan

Quote from: vogue65 on Today at 03:23:02 PMBecause there are selection criteria. 
You are correct, I don't know the rest of the story.  Nevertheless, Marquette looks to me more like Northwestern or Princeton than St. John's or Seton Hall. 
Remember when the decision-makers wanted MU to reassemble Duke?

I think it's safe to say that you don't know any of the story.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

cheebs09

Quote from: brewcity77 on Today at 03:08:19 PMYes, he came assuming he would be a 3/4 wing, but Buzz saw him better suited at the 5. They also weren't sure Otule would be back that year, so that might have impacted the minutes he'd get. So he went to Iowa State where he played two seasons entirely at the 5.

Wasn't there talk of redshirting him too? Maybe I'm misremembering that part.

wisblue

Quote from: The Sultan on Today at 03:26:37 PMIt was literally an upset.

If you consider it an upset any time a team favored by a couple of points loses,maybe it was. But I'll bet if you went back and looked at reports of that game you wouldn't see headlines like "Badgers Upset Eagles" or "Wisconsin Shocks Marquette".

If Marquette wins Saturday you will definitely see words like that thrown around. In my book there's a pretty big difference in expectation for a game with a 4 point spread as opposed to a double digit spread.

Its DJOver

If <insert definition of an upset> happened, then maybe it's an upset.
Scoop motto:
Quote from: ATL MU Warrior on February 06, 2025, 06:04:29 PMthe stats bear that out, but

The Sultan

Quote from: Its DJOver on Today at 03:43:18 PMIf <insert definition of an upset> happened, then maybe it's an upset.

LOL. Right?
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

WhiteTrash

Quote from: The Sultan on Today at 03:18:02 PMIf Shaka wanted transfers, Marquette would accept transfers. Why is this so hard to understand?
The idea that a coach with Shaka's resume would be handcuffed by the administration on a ubiquitous roster building strategy is laughable.

wisblue

In the context of this conversation, I am disputing the statement that a double digit underdog winning would be no "crazier" than a four point underdog winning.

Even if the Badgers win over MU in 2022 was technically an "upset" by the broadest definition of the word, it was not considered one or reported that way at the time.

Previous topic - Next topic