collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Pearson to MU by Zog from Margo
[Today at 06:20:46 AM]


What is the actual gap between Marquette and the top of the Big East by tower912
[Today at 04:37:02 AM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by tower912
[Today at 04:32:26 AM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by Aircraftcarrier
[May 18, 2025, 06:49:48 PM]


Scouting Report: Ian Miletic by MU82
[May 18, 2025, 02:36:17 PM]


2026 Bracketology by MU82
[May 18, 2025, 02:32:12 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


Spotcheck Billy

or Boston College which might be the 1st Power 5 school to go winless in conference for both football and basketball

brewcity77

Kudos to both teams as they pursue these historic feats.

Goatherder

A strength of the new Big East alignment, and an argument IMO of sticking to private non-football schools.  Although Rutgers was offered a chance to be a charter member of the Big East, they turned it down.  When the Big East got big and good and prominent, Rutgers went nowhere.   There was absolutely no reason to add Rutgers to the conference other than football, and they were dubious there.  Seton Hall had already taken the New Jersey market. 

When the Catholic 7 split from the Big East, of course it was sad to lose Louisville and UConn, and West Virginia and Pitt were pretty good, even if their fans were jerks, but we also left behind Rutgers and USF, not to mention whichever schools got added on in the interest of football.  The current conference has ten good, pretty good, or potentially good basketball programs, and they are all committed to men's basketball.  No need to accommodate bad fitting schools because they have a football team.  Rutgers is no doubt making a bunch of money being in the Big ??, but athletically, they have taken a dive, and they were not good to begin with.  Meanwhile, they are an anchor on the Big ??.  An outlier with no natural rivalries, little athletic history, and nothing to offer except lots of people with TV sets. 

Buzz Williams' Spillproof Chiclets Cup

Quote from: Goatherder on February 24, 2016, 12:23:35 PM
A strength of the new Big East alignment, and an argument IMO of sticking to private non-football schools.  Although Rutgers was offered a chance to be a charter member of the Big East, they turned it down.  When the Big East got big and good and prominent, Rutgers went nowhere.   There was absolutely no reason to add Rutgers to the conference other than football, and they were dubious there.  Seton Hall had already taken the New Jersey market. 

When the Catholic 7 split from the Big East, of course it was sad to lose Louisville and UConn, and West Virginia and Pitt were pretty good, even if their fans were jerks, but we also left behind Rutgers and USF, not to mention whichever schools got added on in the interest of football.  The current conference has ten good, pretty good, or potentially good basketball programs, and they are all committed to men's basketball.  No need to accommodate bad fitting schools because they have a football team.  Rutgers is no doubt making a bunch of money being in the Big ??, but athletically, they have taken a dive, and they were not good to begin with.  Meanwhile, they are an anchor on the Big ??.  An outlier with no natural rivalries, little athletic history, and nothing to offer except lots of people with TV sets.

Last Four Off The Boat



Rutgers is of their ilk, but at least they got a BTN payday.
“These guys in this locker room are all warriors -- every one of them. We ought to change our name back from the Golden Eagles because Warriors are what we really are." ~Wesley Matthews

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


Herman Cain

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on February 24, 2016, 09:35:40 AM
http://www.crimsonquarry.com/2016/2/23/11098924/rutgers-basketball-has-a-chance-to-be-the-first-sub-300-kenpom-power

If you ever need to feel good about yourself, just think about Rutgers basketball.
One of the problems Rutgers has is it has a screwy campus. It is 4 separate campuses connected by buses. Makes for a lousy student experience. I suppose at the end of the day, all you need to do is recruit 4 good guys a year, but when kids have other options it is easy to see why they go elsewhere. So they get the bottom tier of recruits.

Their football program can semi compete, because as a public school they historically have been able to get a lot of instate NJ walk on talent to fill out the program. They come close to selling out their stadium etc and can offer a kid a big time football experience. Basketball is a doormat there.
"It was a Great Day until it wasn't"
    ——Rory McIlroy on Final Round at Pinehurst

Coleman

This is what really got me:

Not only is rutgers by far the worst P5 school, their Ken Pom ranking would be last in the following conferences
Sun Belt
West Coast (Gonzaga's conference)
MAC
Ivy League
The Summit (by 57 spots!)

Windyplayer

Maybe they get John Groce in the offseason. Interpret "get" how you may.

GooooMarquette

Ought to make that season-ending MN @ Rutgers game quite a draw.

Previous topic - Next topic