collapse

Resources

Stud of Detroit Mercy Game

Sananda Fru

8 points, 8 rebounds,
3 assists, 1 block,
1 steal, 22 minutes

2026-27 Season SoG Tally
Clark1
Fru1

'25-26
'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

26-27 Miscellaneous college hoops thread by Newsdreams
[Today at 10:33:22 PM]


Big East Non-Con Talk by K1 Lover
[Today at 10:23:15 PM]


The Problem With NJ by Markusquette
[Today at 08:48:10 PM]


Marquette vs. Missouri by wadesworld
[Today at 07:46:07 PM]


Length, Depth, Finishing by Scoop Snoop
[Today at 07:10:20 PM]


Welp! by MU82
[Today at 06:34:29 PM]


Four Questions by Viper
[Today at 05:43:40 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  Missouri (@ United Center)

Marquette
70
Marquette vs
Missouri
Date/Time: Nov 15, 2026 / 1:30pm
TV: Peacock/NBCSN
Schedule for 2026-27
Michigan
84

barfolomew

I see that ESPN currently has us 346th in rebounds per game in the nation (is that dead last these days, or second to last?) at 28.0 per game.
I think that the numbers will improve a bit by the end of the season as there are some teams in the BE that we match up ok with, now that Luke's in the fold.
Plus, I look forward to next year's numbers looking very different indeed.

Relationes Incrementum Victoria

PGsHeroes32

Things should start to look a lot different with Luke I would hope.

But I am far less worried about our total number as I am the margin.

We can keep snagging 28 as long as the other team is getting 24-32ish each game as well.

Although the more rebounds obviously increases the odds that the other team is shooting like crap as well.
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

bamamarquettefan

Quote from: barfolomew on December 22, 2014, 03:27:00 PM
I see that ESPN currently has us 346th in rebounds per game in the nation (is that dead last these days, or second to last?) at 28.0 per game.
I think that the numbers will improve a bit by the end of the season as there are some teams in the BE that we match up ok with, now that Luke's in the fold.
Plus, I look forward to next year's numbers looking very different indeed.
We play at a slow pace tempo wise, which is funny with all the steals we have, so there are fewer chances. We are a little better than that at 309th best in allowing 36.5% of opponents shots to be grabbed by them for offensive rebounds - still bad but up several spots at 309th.

Since Fischer joined, MU has allowed just 25.3% offensive rebounding by opponents, meaning MU would be the 16th best defensive rebounding team in the country if that were the whole season.

So he takes MU from one of the bottom 25 defensive rebounding teams to one of the top 16 defensive rebounding teams. That won't hold up, but to answer your question it should get much, much better.
The www.valueaddsports.com analysis of basketball, football and baseball players are intended to neither be too hot or too cold - hundreds immerse themselves in studies of stats not of interest to broader fan bases (too hot), while others still insist on pure observation (too cold).

brandx

Quote from: barfolomew on December 22, 2014, 03:27:00 PM
I see that ESPN currently has us 346th in rebounds per game in the nation (is that dead last these days, or second to last?) at 28.0 per game.
I think that the numbers will improve a bit by the end of the season as there are some teams in the BE that we match up ok with, now that Luke's in the fold.
Plus, I look forward to next year's numbers looking very different indeed.



2 things:

1. We were giving up horrendous shooting percentages pre-Luke meaning fewer total rebounds.

2. We had no big man pre-Luke. We are averaging 32.0 since Luke is on the floor.

Previous topic - Next topic