Main Menu
collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 7/15/25 by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[Today at 05:10:09 PM]


NM by MU82
[Today at 01:10:45 PM]


Open practice by jfp61
[Today at 10:03:37 AM]


TBT by #UnleashSean
[July 18, 2025, 07:01:47 PM]


Pearson to MU by Jay Bee
[July 18, 2025, 05:17:54 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by JakeBarnes
[July 17, 2025, 10:06:35 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

tower912

No one is going to argue that Duane or JJJ don't deserve it.   My argument is that Luke deserved it more.   Efficiency, rebounds, blocks.   Looked winded at the end, but that is expected.   
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

jsglow

I agree that both Duane and JjJ played very solid SOG games.  But Luke absolutely changed the game and perhaps the entire outlook for our team this year.  That was simply the best center play at both ends of the court for the Warriors since Jimmy Mac.  He was the best player on the floor by a good margin and made everyone around him better.

Spotcheck Billy


Lighthouse 84

Quote from: RushmoreAcademy on December 17, 2014, 05:17:52 AM
I agree with you that Luke changed the game last night more than anyone else.... but..... I really question your math skills.
Uh, 1-2=50%
      9-17=52.94%

Therefore, Rocky's math skill's > Rushmore's.

But c'mon Rock, Luke altered shots, blocked shots, opened the lane for Du and JjJ and otherwise changed the Warrior's game as we know it!  Give it to the big fella!
HILLTOP SENIOR SURVEY from 1984 Yearbook: 
Favorite Drinking Establishment:

1. The Avalanche.              7. Major Goolsby's.
2. The Gym.                      8. Park Avenue.
3. The Ardmore.                 9. Mugrack.
4. O'Donohues.                 10. Lighthouse.
5. O'Pagets.
6. Hagerty's.

jsglow

I'd personally argue that last night can't be examined by box score numbers alone.  Luke owned the floor.  ASU shot poorly because of Luke.  We rebounded as a team better because of Luke.  Our guards drove the rim more effectively because of Luke.  We had important players who had 'off' nights (Carlino and Derrick).  It didn't matter one hill of beans because we're a MUCH better team than last week BECAUSE of Luke.

chapman

Luke.  Christmas came early.  Did not expect a game changer like that in his first game.

Lighthouse 84

Quote from: jsglow on December 17, 2014, 07:45:25 AM
I'd personally argue that last night can't be examined by box score numbers alone.  Luke owned the floor.  ASU shot poorly because of Luke.  We rebounded as a team better because of Luke.  Our guards drove the rim more effectively because of Luke.  We had important players who had 'off' nights (Carlino and Derrick).  It didn't matter one hill of beans because we're a MUCH better team than last week BECAUSE of Luke.
I'd argue that the defense by Luke provided many of the fast break opportunities for JjJ and Du.
HILLTOP SENIOR SURVEY from 1984 Yearbook: 
Favorite Drinking Establishment:

1. The Avalanche.              7. Major Goolsby's.
2. The Gym.                      8. Park Avenue.
3. The Ardmore.                 9. Mugrack.
4. O'Donohues.                 10. Lighthouse.
5. O'Pagets.
6. Hagerty's.

RubyWiscy

Gotta be Luke. His presence on the court changed how MU played. Only times I got a bit concerned about AS making a run was when he was out. Hopefully he is a catalyst for JJJ's game as well. Guards seemed much more confident and relaxed when Luke was on the floor. Almost too relaxed as they seemed to forget about him a bit on Offense in the 2nd half.

jsglow

Quote from: Lighthouse 84 on December 17, 2014, 08:00:38 AM
I'd argue that the defense by Luke provided many of the fast break opportunities for JjJ and Du.

Absolutely agree.  Great point.

DoggyDaddy


CTWarrior

Luke over JjJ and Duane, but special props to Juan Anderson for the quintessential floor game.  He was in the middle of everything when we took control of the game. 
Calvin:  I'm a genius.  But I'm a misunderstood genius. 
Hobbes:  What's misunderstood about you?
Calvin:  Nobody thinks I'm a genius.

leever

Have to go with Luke, but might have changed my vote if the team would just practice shooting free throws

AZWarrior

I really love it when we can have a spirited discussion over which deserving player is most deserving.

That said, Luke gets my vote.

Feed the Fisch.
All this talk of rights.  So little talk of responsibilities.

wyoMUfan

Quote from: LA on December 16, 2014, 10:06:11 PM
1. Luke (5 blocks is HUGE)
2. JJ (Shot the ball well, great in transition, 3 steals)
3. Duane (Would be #2 if not for the bad day at the line)
4. Juan (love the effort and assists)


1. Luke (5 blocks is HUGE)
AGREE

buckchuckler

Quote from: tower912 on December 17, 2014, 06:14:18 AM
No one is going to argue that Duane or JJJ don't deserve it.   My argument is that Luke deserved it more.   Efficiency, rebounds, blocks.   Looked winded at the end, but that is expected.   

C'mon, let's just do cerberus and go three headed monster. 

MU82

#65
Quote from: Lighthouse 84 on December 17, 2014, 07:37:07 AM
Uh, 1-2=50%
     9-17=52.94%

Therefore, Rocky's math skill's > Rushmore's.

But c'mon Rock, Luke altered shots, blocked shots, opened the lane for Du and JjJ and otherwise changed the Warrior's game as we know it!  Give it to the big fella!

I believe it was my math skills that were being questioned. And I will admit that I became a writer because it didn't involve much math. But I knew when I wrote my post that 9-for-17 was better than 1-2 percentage-wise. That's not what I was questioning.

I was questioning whether the stat was significant enough to be included as a reason to pick one stud over another. One could make a pretty decent argument that missing 8 FTs would be a negative factor.

I was stunned every time one of those FTs clanked, too, because the kid is an amazing shooter and I think he was at around 90% going into the game.

Otherwise, I loved Duane's game and have confidence in his FT shooting going forward.

Luke impacted this particular game more, however. Aside from Carlino's 38-point game, I believe this was the biggest game-changing performance we've had all season. The numbers were superb and the intangibles were off the chart.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

jsglow

Quote from: MU82 on December 17, 2014, 12:16:35 PM
I believe it was my math skills that were being questioned. And I will admit that I became a writer because it didn't involve much math. But I knew when I wrote my post that 9-for-17 was better than 1-2 percentage-wise. That's not what I was questioning.

I was questioning whether it was the stat was significant enough to be included as a reason to pick one stud over another. One could make a pretty decent argument that missing 8 FTs would be a negative factor.

I was stunned every time one of those FTs clanked, too, because the kid is an amazing shooter and I think he was at around 90% going into the game.

Otherwise, I loved Duane's game and have confidence in his FT shooting going forward.

Luke impacted this particular game more, however. Aside from Carlino's 38-point game, I believe this was the biggest game-changing performance we've had all season. The numbers were superb and the intangibles were off the chart.

I think it just got into Duane's head after he missed those first three.  He's a very good free throw shooter.  He'll bounce back.  All's good.

BM1090

Is there a reason that I can't see the SOTG graphic? It hasn't been showing up on my screen on desktop or mobile all year. And it's not a "picture won't load" problem. It just is never there, like I accidentally hid it or something.

RushmoreAcademy

Quote from: Lighthouse 84 on December 17, 2014, 07:37:07 AM
Uh, 1-2=50%
      9-17=52.94%

Therefore, Rocky's math skill's > Rushmore's.



In the original post he said that 1-2 was a better percentage than 9-17.
Rushmore's math skills > Rocky's math skills > Lighthouse reading comp

Seriously though, I get what you're saying about the significance of the stat.  It's a good point.  But I think 9-17 is a pretty good line..... the free throws, I'll give that to you.

bamamarquettefan

I agree completely on your order. Watching last night, all I could think about was Al McGuire saying it took 3 1/2 stars to win a championship.  Your top 3 were all unstoppable stars most of the night, and for two years I've had Juan as one of the most underrated players who does so many things. I also do like that Carlino saw others had the hot hand and didn't insist on being "the man." The wrap by BYU friends had on him was that he was always going to take 20 shots a game even if he was cold and others were hot, but his ability to go out and score 38 when we had to have it but be content to go to the others on an offnight was great for me

Quote from: Lighthouse 84 on December 16, 2014, 10:02:10 PM
Props to Real Chili 83!

1.  Luke
2.  Du. But 9-17 from the line?
3.  JjJ
4.  Juan

Any other game, it could have been any of them. JjJ and Juan could be flip flopped. But tonight, it's the traditional from Germantown. He was very good and made others better.

Go Warriors!
The www.valueaddsports.com analysis of basketball, football and baseball players are intended to neither be too hot or too cold - hundreds immerse themselves in studies of stats not of interest to broader fan bases (too hot), while others still insist on pure observation (too cold).

rocky_warrior

Quote from: RushmoreAcademy on December 17, 2014, 12:37:30 PM
In the original post he said that 1-2 was a better percentage than 9-17.

No I didn't...

Quote from: rocky_warrior on December 16, 2014, 11:33:01 PM
Sure 9-17ft, but that's a better percentage than Luke's 1-2

Anyhow, sorry for the delay, busy day.  Luke is the Stud...I I'll post it, but will have to look up a picture later.

chapman

Quote from: rocky_warrior on December 17, 2014, 12:57:04 PM
Anyhow, sorry for the delay, busy day.  Luke is the Stud...I I'll post it, but will have to look up a picture later.

Seems Like Fischer pulled a last minute upset   :P






Though an IU shorts pic might be just what we all need...



real chili 83

Quote from: rocky_warrior on December 17, 2014, 12:57:04 PM
No I didn't...

Anyhow, sorry for the delay, busy day.  Luke is the Stud...I I'll post it, but will have to look up a picture later.

Use this for a picture....


rocky_warrior

Quote from: chapman on December 17, 2014, 01:05:15 PM
Seems Like Fischer pulled a last minute upset   :P

He was just more Likeable

jsglow

Nice action shot rocky.  I believe that was the nice pass by Juan for the rim rocker throw down.

Previous topic - Next topic