collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by Aircraftcarrier
[Today at 06:49:48 PM]


What is the actual gap between Marquette and the top of the Big East by DoctorV
[Today at 04:47:25 PM]


Scouting Report: Ian Miletic by MU82
[Today at 02:36:17 PM]


2026 Bracketology by MU82
[Today at 02:32:12 PM]


Pearson to MU by MuMark
[Today at 11:11:57 AM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by The Sultan
[Today at 08:41:12 AM]


NM by mu_hilltopper
[May 17, 2025, 03:51:26 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Howdy ya'll.

Just out of curiosity, I decided to rank last year's conferences by their average KenPom ratings. Even though the tournament committee uses RPI (as CBB will be quick to remind us of) I have found KP to be a more accurate judge of a team's strength. I found some interesting numbers, ranked if you are curious,

B1G: 49.25
B12: 58.4
ACC: 66
PAC 12: 71.75
BEast: 75
SEC: 81.5
A10: 85.46
AAC: 89.9
WCC: 115.4
MWC: 130.27
MVC: 153.7
CUSA: 171.29

This is only one perspective but it tells me a couple of things. 1. There is a big divide between the top 8 conferences and the rest. 2. The BEast is safe inside that top 8, coming in 5th. 3. The B1G is ridiculously good. 4. The AAC is the most top heavy conference in the history of sports.

And again, just out of curiosity I re-ranked the conferences but factored in next year's realignment. Here's how the spread will look.

B1G: 56.93 (Rutgers is that bad)
B12: 58.4
ACC: 63.4
PAC 12: 71.75
BEast: 75
SEC: 81.5
A10: 85.46
WCC: 115.4
AAC: 120.82
MWC: 130.27
MVC: 153.7
CUSA: 180.07

With the trade of Louisville/Rutgers for ECU/Tulsa/Tulane, the AAC's average KP drops down to mid major levels. They will be actually worse than the WCC and only slightly ahead of the MWC. Granted, some of their programs such as Temple and South Florida should be better next season, but the AAC may be heading for mid-major status. Are the trio of UConn, Cincy, and Memphis now the Gonzaga, St. Mary's, and BYU of the east?
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


77ncaachamps

UConn
Memphis
Cincy
Temple

Those are the top four teams in the 2014-15 AAC, in my opinion.
The Big East's?

Georgetown
Villanova
Marquette
Xavier

Not that much of a difference, but it's the core that matters: Creighton, Providence, Seton Hall, and St. John's compared to Houston, South Florida, Central Florida, and SMU.
SS Marquette

Galway Eagle

Quote from: 77ncaachamps on April 24, 2014, 04:34:38 PM
UConn
Memphis
Cincy
Temple

Those are the top four teams in the 2014-15 AAC, in my opinion.
The Big East's?

Georgetown
Villanova
Marquette
Xavier

Not that much of a difference, but it's the core that matters: Creighton, Providence, Seton Hall, and St. John's compared to Houston, South Florida, Central Florida, and SMU.

SMU will be awesome next year in the AAC. Providence will probs be better than us next year.  If you're talking about the best four programs in each conference then yes you're probably right.
Retire Terry Rand's jersey!

ChicosBailBonds

RPI  Big East 4th
Sagarin  Big East 5th
Team Rankings Big East 5th
Warren Nolan (NPI)  Big East 4th


MU82

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on April 24, 2014, 04:26:49 PM
Howdy ya'll.

Just out of curiosity, I decided to rank last year's conferences by their average KenPom ratings. Even though the tournament committee uses RPI (as CBB will be quick to remind us of) I have found KP to be a more accurate judge of a team's strength. I found some interesting numbers, ranked if you are curious,

B1G: 49.25
B12: 58.4
ACC: 66
PAC 12: 71.75
BEast: 75
SEC: 81.5
A10: 85.46
AAC: 89.9
WCC: 115.4
MWC: 130.27
MVC: 153.7
CUSA: 171.29

This is only one perspective but it tells me a couple of things. 1. There is a big divide between the top 8 conferences and the rest. 2. The BEast is safe inside that top 8, coming in 5th. 3. The B1G is ridiculously good. 4. The AAC is the most top heavy conference in the history of sports.

And again, just out of curiosity I re-ranked the conferences but factored in next year's realignment. Here's how the spread will look.

B1G: 56.93 (Rutgers is that bad)
B12: 58.4
ACC: 63.4
PAC 12: 71.75
BEast: 75
SEC: 81.5
A10: 85.46
WCC: 115.4
AAC: 120.82
MWC: 130.27
MVC: 153.7
CUSA: 180.07

With the trade of Louisville/Rutgers for ECU/Tulsa/Tulane, the ACC's average KP drops down to mid major levels. They will be actually worse than the WCC and only slightly ahead of the MWC. Granted, some of their programs such as Temple and South Florida should be better next season, but the AAC may be heading for mid-major status. Are the trio of UConn, Cincy, and Memphis now the Gonzaga, St. Mary's, and BYU of the east?

I'm not sure I'm right about this, but isn't Ken Pom the guy who had Bucky ranked No. 1 for like 4 straight years and he had to admit that there was something funky about Bucky's style that made them a statistical outlier in his system?
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: MU82 on April 24, 2014, 05:14:02 PM
I'm not sure I'm right about this, but isn't Ken Pom the guy who had Bucky ranked No. 1 for like 4 straight years and he had to admit that there was something funky about Bucky's style that made them a statistical outlier in his system?

Funny enough, in this their best year, they were only ranked 5th
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


Tums Festival

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on April 24, 2014, 04:26:49 PM
Howdy ya'll.

Just out of curiosity, I decided to rank last year's conferences by their average KenPom ratings. Even though the tournament committee uses RPI (as CBB will be quick to remind us of) I have found KP to be a more accurate judge of a team's strength. I found some interesting numbers, ranked if you are curious,

B1G: 49.25
B12: 58.4
ACC: 66
PAC 12: 71.75
BEast: 75
SEC: 81.5
A10: 85.46
AAC: 89.9
WCC: 115.4
MWC: 130.27
MVC: 153.7
CUSA: 171.29

This is only one perspective but it tells me a couple of things. 1. There is a big divide between the top 8 conferences and the rest. 2. The BEast is safe inside that top 8, coming in 5th. 3. The B1G is ridiculously good. 4. The AAC ACC is the most top heavy conference in the history of sports.

And again, just out of curiosity I re-ranked the conferences but factored in next year's realignment. Here's how the spread will look.

B1G: 56.93 (Rutgers is that bad)
B12: 58.4
ACC: 63.4
PAC 12: 71.75
BEast: 75
SEC: 81.5
A10: 85.46
WCC: 115.4
AAC: 120.82
MWC: 130.27
MVC: 153.7
CUSA: 180.07

With the trade of Louisville/Rutgers for ECU/Tulsa/Tulane, the ACC's AAC's average KP drops down to mid major levels. They will be actually worse than the WCC and only slightly ahead of the MWC. Granted, some of their programs such as Temple and South Florida should be better next season, but the AAC may be heading for mid-major status. Are the trio of UConn, Cincy, and Memphis now the Gonzaga, St. Mary's, and BYU of the east?

Did the ACC and AAC get swapped in these two spots?
"Every day ends with a Tums festival!"

Dawson Rental

Quote from: BagpipingBoxer on April 24, 2014, 04:37:59 PM

SMU will be awesome next year in the AAC. Providence will probs be better than us next year.  If you're talking about the best four programs in each conference then yes you're probably right.

Let us not forget the backsliding that will happen at Houston in light of their two best players transferring due to the coaching change.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

THRILLHO

Just because I'm wary of average, and there is no single defined way to measure conference strength, I thought I'd throw in conference rankings by median team, just to see what pops out. When there was an even number of teams there is no single median so I averaged the ranking of the two median teams.


ConferenceMedian Ranking (kpom)Team
B1236Average of Texas and Oklahoma
ACC41FSU
B1G48.5Average of Minnesota and Illinois
P1254.5Average of ASU and Cal
BEast63Average of St. Johns and Georgetown
SEC81Average of Missou and Mississippi
AAC81Average of Memphis and Houston
A1085St. Bonaventure

The most interesting thing to me was how good the Big 12 was. Only TCU's horribleness made them look worse than the Big 10. On the other hand, the ACC and Big 10 are still very impressive considering how many teams they have. The Big East doesn't move positions

ChitownSpaceForRent

But wait, what about the Big East being a dying mid-major conference? We cant let the facts get in the way of that.

keefe

Quote from: MU82 on April 24, 2014, 05:14:02 PM
I'm not sure I'm right about this, but isn't Ken Pom the guy who had Bucky ranked No. 1 for like 4 straight years and he had to admit that there was something funky about Bucky's style that made them a statistical outlier in his system?

There is nothing funky about Wisconsin's style of play. Don't people know Ken Pom's true identity?



Death on call

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: Heavy Gear on April 24, 2014, 05:44:16 PM
Did the ACC and AAC get swapped in these two spots?

The second one yes. It is now fixed. But the AAC is the most the most top heavy conference IMHO.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


MaymonsPops

Quote from: BagpipingBoxer on April 24, 2014, 04:37:59 PM

SMU will be awesome next year in the AAC. Providence will probs be better than us next year.  If you're talking about the best four programs in each conference then yes you're probably right.

I don't see it. Bryce Cotton was perhaps the most important player to his team in the entire NCAA. Couple that in with losing Batts, I'm not sure they sniff the tourney this year and I have hope for Marquette to at least be a bubble team. I don't think their recruiting class comes in and dominates off the bat.

The Equalizer

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on April 24, 2014, 04:26:49 PM
Are the trio of UConn, Cincy, and Memphis now the Gonzaga, St. Mary's, and BYU of the east?

We're supposed to overlook the fact that UConn just won its 2nd national championship in four years (and 4th overall), and lump them with three teams who each can claim an Elite Eight as their biggest-ever school achievement (with one of them not having been there in 33 years, and one 55 years removed from the achievement?)

To answer your question: No, I don't think UConn, Cincy or Memphis are now the Gonzaga, St. Mary's and BYU of the east.

Ask again in 30 years.  If UConn, Cincy and Memphis have one elite eight in that time between the three of them, then the question warrants a serious discussion.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: The Equalizer on April 25, 2014, 01:27:50 PM
We're supposed to overlook the fact that UConn just won its 2nd national championship in four years (and 4th overall), and lump them with three teams who each can claim an Elite Eight as their biggest-ever school achievement (with one of them not having been there in 33 years, and one 55 years removed from the achievement?)

To answer your question: No, I don't think UConn, Cincy or Memphis are now the Gonzaga, St. Mary's and BYU of the east.

Ask again in 30 years.  If UConn, Cincy and Memphis have one elite eight in that time between the three of them, then the question warrants a serious discussion.

It obviously isn't a perfect comparison. I was more drawing the connection of a trio of talented teams who year after year dominate in a sub par conference. But I see your point
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


MUDPT

Pomeroy ranks conferences for everyone so we don't have to.

1. Big 10
2. Big 12
3. ACC
4. PAC 12
5. Big East
6. SEC
7. AAC
8. A-10
9. West Coast
10. Mountain West

Pomeroy mentioned in his post-season wrap-up that maybe the Big East should have more teams to differentiate the good and the bad.  Specifically from an RPI perspective, two more wins over a bad team will look better than two losses from a better team.

Previous topic - Next topic