collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?  (Read 2827 times)

PuertoRicanNightmare

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3243
Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« on: March 28, 2014, 11:04:10 AM »


The Love House

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2014, 11:09:04 AM »
In his defense, he does have a purdy mouth.

JakeBarnes

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5595
Re: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« Reply #2 on: March 28, 2014, 11:09:10 AM »
OMG NO. I CAN'T BELIEVE IT. HE IS SO DUMB. WHY ARE WE LETTING PEOPLE RUN THE UNIVERSITY THAT CAN'T DO THINGS LIKE MAKE INTERNET MESSAGE BOARDS HAPPY. I HATE HIM. I WISH HE WOULD JUST GO. HE'S NOT MY REAL DAD. CLEARLY HE DIDN'T OFFER ENOUGH HANDYS UNDER THE TABLE TO SHAKA. IF HE REALLY WANTS TO SHOW COMMITMENT TO THE UNIVERSITY HE'D HAVE OUR NEW COACH ENTER THE PRESS CONFERENCE IN A ROCKET PACK.

Seriously though, he got put in a tough place to start out. We advocate a 5 year judgment for coaches. Let's give the new President more than 5 days before we judge him.
Assume what I say should be in teal if it doesn't pass the smell test for you.


Groin_pull

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1861
Re: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« Reply #3 on: March 28, 2014, 11:10:05 AM »
On a slightly related topic, is anyone else a bit disturbed that it appears MU hustled through the announcement of its new president to accommodate a coaching candidate?

Have to admit, I raised my eyebrows a bit.

Now of course, I would never confuse MU with Harvard or Stanford, but c'mon. Education is what MU is supposed to be about. I hope Lovell was the guy they really wanted all along, but it feels like raced him through his unveiling and immediately stuck him on a place to Richmond to kiss Smart's as*.

Not the end of the world, just a bit off in my eyes.

ChitownSpaceForRent

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6315
Re: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« Reply #4 on: March 28, 2014, 11:10:53 AM »
Posted this in the superbar. Appropriate to post it here for the naysayers...

Had a chance to meet him today. I will try to alleviate any concerns people had about him not being a people person. I was walking around campus saw him and said welcome to MU and he asked me if I would walk for him for a bit. Awesome guy. Super charismatic, super genuine and interacted with me more in 5 minutes then Pilarz did in his whole tenure. Asked me what I liked about MU, what I didnt like etc. I was ready to rip out a check for him if I had money. From a students perspective an A+ hire based on first impression. Pilarz didnt impress me much when I first heard him during freshman orientation.

NavinRJohnson

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4209
Re: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« Reply #5 on: March 28, 2014, 11:12:28 AM »

Aughnanure

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2860
Re: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« Reply #6 on: March 28, 2014, 11:13:13 AM »
On a slightly related topic, is anyone else a bit disturbed that it appears MU hustled through the announcement of its new president to accommodate a coaching candidate?

Have to admit, I raised my eyebrows a bit.

Now of course, I would never confuse MU with Harvard or Stanford, but c'mon. Education is what MU is supposed to be about. I hope Lovell was the guy they really wanted all along, but it feels like raced him through his unveiling and immediately stuck him on a place to Richmond to kiss Smart's as*.

Not the end of the world, just a bit off in my eyes.

Obviously he was and they pushed up the announcement. And I think pushing up the announcement and getting a permanent president on board is going to be important for all potential coaching candidates, not just Shaka.
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.” - T.E. Lawrence

chapman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5746
Re: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2014, 11:14:58 AM »
Not something Dr. Lovell can be judged by.  Completely unfair to him.

Groin_pull

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1861
Re: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2014, 11:19:38 AM »
Obviously he was and they pushed up the announcement. And I think pushing up the announcement and getting a permanent president on board is going to be important for all potential coaching candidates, not just Shaka.

Can someone explain why, if Lovell was always the guy, MU was content to wait until the end of April? Why the delay?

And by the way, Lovell seems like a talented guy. Solid hire. The only good thing that came out of this week.

JakeBarnes

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5595
Re: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« Reply #9 on: March 28, 2014, 11:23:24 AM »
Can someone explain why, if Lovell was always the guy, MU was content to wait until the end of April? Why the delay?

And by the way, Lovell seems like a talented guy. Solid hire. The only good thing that came out of this week.

Because that's when the next meeting was and they planned to do the formal voting approval then.
Assume what I say should be in teal if it doesn't pass the smell test for you.


MUMac

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2498
Re: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« Reply #10 on: March 28, 2014, 11:23:44 AM »
Can someone explain why, if Lovell was always the guy, MU was content to wait until the end of April? Why the delay?

And by the way, Lovell seems like a talented guy. Solid hire. The only good thing that came out of this week.

Out of respect for Lovell and his current employer UWM.  It was a timed announced decision to allow for the end of the school year and graduation.

Bo Ryan's Massage Therapist

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Re: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« Reply #11 on: March 28, 2014, 11:34:10 AM »
Awesome awesome hire. Heard his interview on 620 WMTJ. Charlie Sykes asked some difficult questions and he was very polished, well spoken, good sense of humor.  Did not falter when pressured with difficult questions. This is a homerun hire. 
“If a player leaves Marquette and doesn’t have some of my blood in him, then I don’t think I’ve done a good job.”  Al McGuire

MikeDeanesDarkGlasses

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1512
  • "Seat belts On! We're Going For A Ride!"
Re: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« Reply #12 on: March 28, 2014, 11:36:41 AM »
Hey Boneheads!!!

Good Start???  If you had read the article about him on jsonline, you'd realize his tenure doesn't start until August 1st.  There are these things called .... orientation and job training.  He just doesn't walk in the office and know who his administration is going to be, what needs to be done, etc.  The next several weeks will be dedicated to meetings where he will get a pulse of what's going on at MU and meet all of the big players involved with the university.  

*Shakes Head*

ChitownSpaceForRent

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6315
Re: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« Reply #13 on: March 28, 2014, 11:37:58 AM »
Hey Boneheads!!!

Good Start???  If you had read the article about him on jsonline, you'd realize his tenure doesn't start until August 1st.  There are these things called .... orientation and job training.  He just doesn't walk in the office and know who his administration is going to be, what needs to be done, etc.  The next several weeks will be dedicated to meetings where he will get a pulse of what's going on at MU and meet all of the big players involved with the university.  

*Shakes Head*

Ya true. He was walking with someone who looked higher up before he talked to me.

Milwarriorkee

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
Re: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« Reply #14 on: March 28, 2014, 11:39:35 AM »
Posted this in the superbar. Appropriate to post it here for the naysayers...

Had a chance to meet him today. I will try to alleviate any concerns people had about him not being a people person. I was walking around campus saw him and said welcome to MU and he asked me if I would walk for him for a bit. Awesome guy. Super charismatic, super genuine and interacted with me more in 5 minutes then Pilarz did in his whole tenure. Asked me what I liked about MU, what I didnt like etc. I was ready to rip out a check for him if I had money. From a students perspective an A+ hire based on first impression. Pilarz didnt impress me much when I first heard him during freshman orientation.

Did you ask him what exactly went down on his trip to Virginia?  Not sure if that should be in teal or not.

chapman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5746
Re: Was this a good start for our new president's tenure?
« Reply #15 on: March 28, 2014, 11:41:09 AM »
Good Start???  If you had read the article about him on jsonline, you'd realize his tenure doesn't start until August 1st.

First impression would be the better term.  And still unfair to him. 

 

feedback