collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

How Shaka Can Save This Season by Shooter McGavin
[Today at 10:00:41 AM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 09:47:47 AM]


Alumni by wadesworld
[Today at 09:41:19 AM]


Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by Pakuni
[Today at 09:14:12 AM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by tower912
[Today at 08:59:54 AM]


6th Year Players - Career Games Played by #UnleashMalik
[Today at 08:14:54 AM]


Marquette NBA Thread by MU82
[Today at 01:08:39 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

MUMountin

For those that follow Nate Silver--the statistician/pollster/sabermatrician savant over at NYT--he has done a nice little analysis of the basketball strength of the new conference based on Sagarin ratings from the last ten years. 

Based on those numbers (and assuming that schools and conferences maintain similar levels of competitiveness--a big assumption), he argues that the new conference will be at least as competitive as any of the major conferences. 

Interesting read from a guy who takes numbers and projections pretty seriously: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/14/a-smart-breakaway-for-big-east-basketball-schools/

boyonthedock

I like it when nate silver says things are a good idea, but this may be a tad bit too surface level for my tastes.

Avenue Commons

Nate Silver is a bad motherunnatural carnal knowledgeer.
We Are Marquette

avid1010

i'd be more interested to see him use value-added data to project the future of the conference, but maybe that's not possible with so many variables.  i do like the data that he did provide...an announcement can't come soon enough.

Ari Gold

I loved nate silver until he said a bunch of stuff I didnt agree with 2 months ago.

PJDunn


Tugg Speedman

#6
Quote from: PJDunn on December 14, 2012, 06:38:06 PM
He pretty much always gets it right...

Most that do what Silver does got it as right as him.  He just did it on a bigger stage.

MarquetteDano

#7
From a pure quality of team perspetive (i.e. not talking money) the only thing the conference will lack is a consistent national champion threat. All of the other major conferences have that.

Not saying the new conference could not have a title but there is no team that will be a consistent threat ala Duke, Kansas, Michigan State, etc.

muwarrior69

#8
Wow! 3-time National Champion out in the cold.

Sorry wrong thread.

reinko

Quote from: Ari Gold on December 14, 2012, 06:06:23 PM
I loved nate silver until he said a bunch of stuff I didnt agree with 2 months ago.

i.e. facts and sound analysis?

Cooby Snacks

Quote from: Ari Gold on December 14, 2012, 06:06:23 PM
I loved nate silver until he said a bunch of stuff I didnt agree with 2 months ago.

That Entourage is pandering garbage and the male equivalent to Sex and the City?

boyonthedock

Quote from: Cooby Snacks on December 14, 2012, 08:36:17 PM
That Entourage is pandering garbage and the male equivalent to Sex and the City?

No, he nailed that one too...

Previous topic - Next topic