collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by Viper
[Today at 04:14:04 PM]


The Altercation by panda
[Today at 03:55:34 PM]


How Shaka Can Save This Season by 21Jumpstreet
[Today at 03:18:47 PM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by WhiteTrash
[Today at 02:28:37 PM]


NM by MU82
[Today at 01:01:04 PM]


[Paint Touches] Marquette Minutes Projections for 2026 by Jay Bee
[Today at 09:25:42 AM]


2026 Transfer Portal Wishlist by GoldenEagles03
[Today at 01:19:26 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

brewcity77

Quote from: bilsu on March 11, 2012, 03:45:18 PMIt was common belief that if Duke/NC played in the ACC championship game the winner would get a one seed. They are still talking on bracketology that NC gets a one seed. To me the process is a complete joke. Not only did Florida St beat both in the ACC tournament they also beat both of them during the regular season. I know they talk about whole body of work, but you can easily make the argument that in the last two months of the season Florida St was better than both Duke and North Carolina, North Carolina a one, Duke a two and Florida St a 3 just doe not make sense.

But in the past 2 months, neither UNC nor Duke have a single sub-100 loss, much less the two that Florida State has. And I don't think anyone in the top three seed lines has a loss as bad as Boston College. Gotta remember that body of work includes not just your high points, but also your lows. Sure, FSU has some great highs, but they also have some pretty woeful lows.

Benny B

Quote from: dwaderoy2004 on March 11, 2012, 03:48:44 PM
Good performances in conference tournaments improves your body of work, no?  Sometimes immensely.

Yes... but there are diminishing returns on how "immensely" you can improve as you move up the S-curve.  FSU is not going to jump from a low 4 seed to a high 3 seed because of what happened today.  MU is not going to drop from 9-10 on the s-curve to a 4 seed.  If anything, FSU usurps Michigan's 3 seed.  The other 3's are still MU, G-Town, and Baylor.
Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

brewcity77

Quote from: Benny B on March 11, 2012, 04:03:10 PMYes... but there are diminishing returns on how "immensely" you can improve as you move up the S-curve.  FSU is not going to jump from a low 4 seed to a high 3 seed because of what happened today.  MU is not going to drop from 9-10 on the s-curve to a 4 seed.  If anything, FSU usurps Michigan's 3 seed.  The other 3's are still MU, G-Town, and Baylor.

I'd take Louisville over Georgetown right now, but otherwise, I agree.

Previous topic - Next topic